The Registry to Study Safety and Performance of the CORDIS Vascular Reconstruction Device and Delivery System (SUNRISE)

December 10, 2018 updated by: Codman & Shurtleff

The SUNRISE Registry - A Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance With the CORDIS ENTERPRISE™ Vascular Reconstruction Device and Delivery System

The objective of the registry is to evaluate the real world safety and performance of the CORDIS ENTERPRISE™ Vascular Reconstruction Device and Delivery System (VRD) to facilitate endovascular coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The data will be collected in consecutive subjects treated with the commercially available product and following standard clinical practice. This registry will be limited to subjects who have received only the CORDIS ENTERPRISE™ VRD during the index procedure. While only limited inclusion or exclusion criteria are specified, uniform, complete and accurate data will be collected peri-procedurally, during the index hospitalization, and during follow-up up to 6 months. All subjects should be treated according to the Instruction For Use (IFU) including conduct of the VRD placement, coiling procedure, application of antiplatelet medication and any other medical therapy to be provided according to local usual practice.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
105

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1070
        • Université Libre de Bruxelles

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients suffering of an intracranial aneurysm and necessitating an endovascular treatment.

Patients who meet all of the general inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria and who agree to voluntarily sign a informed consent form will be enrolled into the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject must be >= 18 years of age and less than 80 years.
  • Diagnosis of a ruptured (Hunt and Hess Grade I - III) or unruptured intracranial aneurysm at the time of the treatment
  • Subject (or his/her legal representative) provides written informed consent for the use of his/her peri-procedural and follow-up data

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Hunt and Hess Grade IV or V subarachnoid hemorrhage at the time of the treatment
  • Severe co-morbidity associated with a life-expectancy of less than six months
  • Poor neurological status at baseline
  • Known allergies to Nitinol metal
  • Known allergies to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine, or clopidogrel or unable or unwilling to tolerate therapy
  • Participation in an investigational drug or another device study is only allowed after written approval of the coordinating investigator or Cordis Medical Monitor.
  • Implantation of an intracranial stent associated with the symptomatic distribution within 12 weeks prior to the index procedure
  • Implantation of carotid stent associated with the symptomatic distribution within 12 weeks prior to the index procedure
  • Atrial fibrillation or known cardiac disorders likely to be associated with cardioembolic symptoms.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
1 Endovascular
All patients implanted with an CORDIS ENTERPRISE Vascular Reconstruction Device.
Device: Vascular Reconstruction Device
CORDIS ENTERPRISE™ VRD
Other Names:
  • ENTERPRISE
  • Codman ENTERPRISE
  • Codman VRD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Successful Intracranial VRD Placement With Satisfactory Coil Mass Position Without the Occurrence of Any Device and/or Procedure Related Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time Frame: Intra-procedure
Successful intracranial VRD placement is defined as stable VRD placement with complete coverage of the aneurysm neck and parent artery patency. Satisfactory coil mass position is defined as VRD maintains coil position within the sac with parent artery patency as defined angiographically
Intra-procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device or Procedure Related Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: index procedure to discharge; an average of 3.8 days
Incidence of device or procedure related adverse events during the index procedure and till discharge
index procedure to discharge; an average of 3.8 days
Satisfactory Coil Mass Position
Time Frame: 6 months
Satisfactory coil mass position is defined as VRD maintains coil position within the sac with parent artery patency as defined angiographically
6 months
Aneurysm Occlusion
Time Frame: post procedure to 6 months
Aneurysm occlusion was assessed using the Raymond Scale (Class 1 - Complete Obliteration / Class 2 - Residual Neck / Class 3 - Residual Aneurysm)
post procedure to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Codman & Shurtleff

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bendszus Martin, MD, Wuerzburg University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Boris Lubicz, MD, Université Libre de Bruxelles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 13, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 13, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 14, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 10, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EN07-01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings