The Activity Intervention for Chemobrain (TACTIC)

March 30, 2017 updated by: Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Exercise Intervention for Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Dysfunction

Cognitive dysfunction following chemotherapy is an adverse treatment effect that impacts the quality of life for many cancer survivors receiving this adjuvant therapy. A strong body of evidence now indicates that that the initiation of a regular exercise program, at levels that are readily achievable by most adults (3-5 d/wk, 30-45 min/session), can improve cognitive function. Importantly, the domains of cognitive function that are enhanced by exercise participation are the same domains that are negatively affected by chemotherapy. Accordingly, we propose a 2 year research program that seeks to develop and test a safe, simple, and effective exercise intervention to optimize cognitive function following chemotherapy. To begin this research, we will: 1) conduct a randomized exercise intervention trial among cancer survivors that report persistent cognitive problems following chemotherapy (n=60), 2) explore possible mediators and moderators of the intervention on cognition in order to begin to understand how the intervention may work and for whom it may be most effective, and 3), conduct a cross-sectional study comparing cancer survivors enrolled in the trial (n=60) and matched controls (n=40) to evaluate the cognitive status among survivors in the intervention. We hypothesize that six-months of regular exercise will enhance cognitive function among cancer survivors, and that cancer survivors reporting cognitive dysfunction will have lower objectively measured cognitive performance than adults who have not received chemotherapy. To our knowledge this study would be the first to examine the influence of regular exercise participation on cognitive function among cancer survivors that experienced cognitive difficulties following chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A substantial number of cancer survivors who receive chemotherapy report mild to moderate cognitive impairment following treatment. These impairments have been reported across a range of cancer types and chemotherapy agents. Adjuvant treatment has been reported to affect multiple cognitive domains, but three domains appear to be most strongly affected (i.e., executive functioning, declarative memory, motor function). Exercise participation, at levels that are readily achievable by most adults (3-5 d/wk, 30-45 min/d), preserves and enhances cognitive function. Importantly, domains that are enhanced by exercise overlap substantially with the domains adversely affected by chemotherapy. Accordingly, we propose a 2 year research program that seeks to develop and test a safe, simple, and effective exercise intervention to optimize cognitive function following chemotherapy. To begin this research, we will: 1) conduct a randomized exercise intervention trial among cancer survivors that report persistent cognitive problems following chemotherapy (exercise, n=30 vs. standard of care, n=30); 2) explore possible mediators and moderators of the intervention effect on cognition; and 3), conduct a cross-sectional study comparing cancer survivors enrolled in the trial (n=60) and matched controls (n=40) to evaluate the cognitive status among survivors in the intervention. We will employ a proven home-based exercise intervention and state of the art cognitive testing of relevant cognitive domains (e.g., Randt Memory Test, Trail Making B, Stroop task, T ask switching, Response compatibility) that we have used in preliminary studies. We hypothesize that six-months of regular exercise will enhance cognitive function among cancer survivors, and that cancer survivors reporting cognitive dysfunction will have lower objectively measured cognitive performance than adults who have not received chemotherapy. To our knowledge this study would be the first to examine the influence of regular exercise participation on cognitive function among cancer survivors that experienced cognitive difficulties following chemotherapy. Completion of this project will provide our research team with the necessary experience and intervention effectiveness information that will be used to conduct future more definitive trials.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
64

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Non-metastatic cancer and received at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy, and report the onset of persistent cognitive difficulties following treatment Age 18+ yrs

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have no prior diagnosis of cancer of the central nervous system,
  2. Not have engaged in regular exercise in the past year (i.e., 5+ days/wk, 20+ min/d, 3+ months),
  3. No cardiovascular disease or orthopedic problems that could be worsened by exercise as reported on the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
  4. No major systemic diseases (e.g., liver, kidney or adrenal diseases).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 2
Usual Care
Behavioral: Usual Care
6-months of behavioral strategies to aid memory/cognition
Experimental: 1
Exercise
Behavioral: Exercise
6-months of regular aerobic exercise

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Objective measures of cognitive function (a test battery)
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Exploratory analyses of psychological status, cardiorespiratory fitness, and inflammatory markers in blood.
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Lance Armstrong Foundation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Charles E. Matthews, PhD, Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 2, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 2, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 3, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TACTIC

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings