Dissection of Differentially Expressed Genes and Pathways in Patients With OSAS Before and After CPAP Treatment

November 30, 2010 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Dissection of Differentially Expressed Genes and Pathways in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Before and After CPAP Treatment

Specific Aim

  1. To verify the differentially expressed genes and pathways between normal and OSA patients, and OSA patients before and after CPAP treatment.

    Genes with changes in expression of more than two-fold between normal and OSA patients as well as OSA patients before and after CPAP treatment were thought as confirmed and were selected for further validation study.

  2. To correlate the confirmed genes with the clinical presentations and CPAP effects in another 50 OSAS subjects to validate the altered gene expressions and pathways involved.

    To investigate the correlation of genes confirmed from RT-PCR (identified gene), another 50 OSAS subjects are included in the study. We analyze the correlation between identified gene and the clinical manifestations and CPAP effect in these 50 OSAS patients.

  3. To establish a cell model to investigate the differentially expressed genes and the putative biological pathways involved in OSA syndrome.

To investigate the functions of genes identified in the first and second year (gene of interest), we establish a cell model with human monocyte cell line U937. We investigate the function of gene of interest through overexpress or knockdown.

Objectives The objectives of this project are to confirm the gene profiled from comparing normal and OSA patients as well as OSA patients before and after CPAP treatment, to investigate the correlation between altered gene expression and clinical presentations and CPAP effects of the OSAS and to identify and confirm corresponding pathway. This study will enhance our understanding of the individual constitution on widely different clinical characteristics and therapeutic variations. All these efforts will also help us to interpret its molecular mechanisms and develop prediction and diagnosis strategies of OSAS. The long-term objectives are to develop therapeutic strategy other than CPAP of OSAS.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is characterized with recurrent collapse of upper airway during sleep and resulted in hypoxia and sleep fragmentation, which resulted in cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders and neurocognitive dysfunctions. The cardiovascular complications attributed to OSAS included hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure and stroke. The mechanisms responsible for developments of cardiovascular sequelae included repeated episodes of hypoxia and hypercapnia, exaggerated negative intrathoracic pressure and bursts of sympathetic activity provoking surges in blood pressure and heart rate. Increase of inflammatory mediators, which included C-reactive protein, oxidative stress, adhesion molecules, vascular endothelial growth factor and proinflammatory cytokines, were thought to involve in the developments of cardiovascular diseases in patients with OSAS.

To clarify the exact mechanisms of OSAS and the linkage to cardiovascular complications, in our previous study, we used oligo microarray to genome-wide profile the gene expression patterns in OSAS patients and the changes of gene expressions before and after four-week CPAP treatment. The oligo-microarray data were processed with CRSD database and two-way hierarchical clustering method. The results showed the gene expression patterns were different between control subjects and OSA patients and CPAP treatment also altered the gene expression patterns. Totally 27 genes and four pathways were identified as target genes and pathways from comparing the gene pattern changes before and after CPAP treatment, which included apoptosis, oxidative phosphorylation, cell adhesion and activation and metabolism. To continue analyzing the gene pattern changes before and after CPAP treatment, we propose this three-year project to achieve the following goals: (1) To verify the differentially expressed genes and pathways between normal and OSA patients, and OSA patients before and after CPAP treatment. (2) To correlate the confirmed genes with the clinical presentations and CPAP effects in another 50 OSAS subjects to validate the altered gene expressions and pathways involved. (3) To establish a cell model to investigate the differentially expressed genes and the putative biological pathways involved in OSA syndrome. The information obtained by this approach is very useful to understand the pathogenic mechanism of OSA that leads to systemic complications and further therapeutic intervention may therefore be possible.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

From patients who were referred to sleep lab for suspect sleep apnea, we selected 50 male patients with age> 18 y/o. with severe OSAS, which were confirmed with by overnight PSG. All were free from neurologic events, chronic pulmonary disease, active infection and substance abuse. Female patients and patients under 18 y/o were excluded. All 50 subjects were treated with 4-week CPAP. All study subjects were admitted, on the day of baseline measurement and four weeks after CPAP use, for clinical evaluation, blood sampling and PSG. And all anti-hypertensive therapy was remained unchanged during the 4-week follow-up period. Changes of parameters, before and after CPAP treatment, were compared between two groups.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe obstructive sleep apnea (AHI>=30/hr) age, sex, BMI match control subject

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refused to participate in this study
  • Had severe obstructive pulmonary disease or active neurological events
  • Enrolled in other studies at the same time

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Taiwan University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Peilin Lee, M.D., National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 8, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 1, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 30, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 200701064R

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings