Exercise After an ICD

November 7, 2014 updated by: Cindy Dougherty, University of Washington

Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Exercise After an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)

An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a small device that is surgically implanted in the chest or abdomen and uses electrical pulses or shocks to help control life-threatening, irregular heartbeats. Increasing aerobic exercise may provide health benefits to people with ICDs. This study will examine the effects of an exercise program on heart and lung function in people who have an ICD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

An ICD is a device designed to quickly detect a life-threatening, rapid heartbeat. Through a process called defibrillation, the ICD tries to convert an abnormal heart rhythm back to normal by delivering an electrical shock to the heart. The ICD continuously monitors heartbeats to ensure that they are normal, and it only delivers a shock to the heart when it senses a life-threatening rhythm. People who have experienced ventricular fibrillation, which is a severely abnormal heart rhythm, or ventricular tachycardia, which is a rapid heart beat that begins in the bottom chambers of the heart, are common recipients of an ICD. Other potential ICD recipients include people who have survived a heart attack, but have weak hearts; people with heart muscle problems; and people with reduced pumping function in their heart. People who have ICDs may benefit from aerobic exercise to improve their physical fitness and overall health. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an exercise program at improving heart and lung function in people who have an ICD.

In this 6-month study, participants will be randomly assigned to either take part in the exercise program or receive usual care. At a baseline study visit, all participants will complete an exercise treadmill test, wear a Holter monitor to record heart activity for 24 hours, undergo blood collection, and complete questionnaires to assess quality of life, anxiety, and depression. Participants taking part in the exercise program will receive 1 hour of exercise education over the telephone. During Weeks 1 through 8, participants will stretch for 10 minutes and walk 1 hour daily for 5 days a week; during Weeks 9 through 24, participants will walk 30 minutes daily for 5 days a week. Participants will wear a Polar Heart Rate monitor to record their heart rate and a pedometer to keep track of the number of steps walked. They will also record details of their exercise in a daily activity log. Throughout the entire study, a study nurse will call participants on a weekly basis to check on their progress and to help resolve any exercise-related problems. At Weeks 8 and 24, all participants including those receiving usual care, will attend a study visit for repeat baseline evaluations. Study researchers will review medical records to collect various information, including the reason for needing an ICD, the type and settings of the ICD, medication use, medical history, current health problems, lab test results, echocardiogram images of the heart, and electrocardiogram (EKG) results.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
160

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ICD implanted in the 12 months prior to study entry
  • Currently taking beta blocker medication
  • Speaks and reads English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable angina, heart attack, or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the 3 months prior to study entry
  • Experienced an ICD shock in the 3 months prior to study entry
  • Currently exercises 3 times a week for 20 minutes a day
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) score for alcohol consumption greater than 4
  • Shore Blessed score for cognitive dysfunction greater than 6

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Experimental: Aerobic Exercise Program
Behavioral: Aerobic Exercise Program
Home walking 1 hour a day for 5 days/week for 8 weeks. Then 30 minutes a day on all or most days of the week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cardiopulmonary function
Time Frame: Measured at Week 8
Measured at Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: Measured at Week 8
Measured at Week 8
Quality of life
Time Frame: Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Anxiety
Time Frame: Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Depression
Time Frame: Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)
Time Frame: Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
ICD shocks
Time Frame: Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Tissue necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha)
Time Frame: Measured at Weeks 8 and 24
Measured at Weeks 8 and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Washington

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 29, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 31202-B
  • R01HL084550-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure, Congestive

Clinical Trials on Aerobic Exercise Program

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings