LUX Lung 2 Phase II Single Arm BIBW 2992 "Afatinib" in NSCLC With EGFR Activating Mutations

July 28, 2016 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

LUX Lung 2 A Phase II Single-arm Trial of BIBW 2992 in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With EGFR Activating Mutations

The primary objective of this open-label, single arm Phase II trial is to explore the efficacy of BIBW 2992 defined by the objective response rate (CR, PR) as determined by RECIST criteria in patients with advanced NSCLC Stage IIIB or IV whose tumors harbor activating mutations within exon 18 to exon 21 of the EGFR receptor. Patients progressing or relapsing after one prior cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen as well as chemotherapy naïve patients (only in stage 2) will be allowed to enter into the trial.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
129

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • 1200.22.88604 Taichung Veterans General Hospital
      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • 1200.22.88605 China Medical University Hospital
      • Tainan, Taiwan
        • 1200.22.88606 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • 1200.22.88601 National Taiwan University Hospital
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • 1200.22.88602 Veterans General Hospital
      • Taipei City, Taiwan
        • 1200.22.88607 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Taoyuan, Taiwan
        • 1200.22.88603 Chang Gung Memorial Hosp-Linkou
  • United States
    • California
      • Bakersfield, California, United States
        • 1200.22.28 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States
        • 1200.22.32 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Mission Hills, California, United States
        • 1200.22.4 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Orange, California, United States
        • 1200.22.16 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
        • 1200.22.19 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • North Miami Beach, Florida, United States
        • 1200.22.29 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
        • 1200.22.10 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • 1200.22.18 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States
        • 1200.22.3 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
        • 1200.22.14 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Michigan
      • Flint, Michigan, United States
        • 1200.22.24 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
        • 1200.22.5 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
        • 1200.22.15 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • New York, New York, United States
        • 1200.22.26 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Rochester, New York, United States
        • 1200.22.1 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Syracuse, New York, United States
        • 1200.22.27 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Valhalla, New York, United States
        • 1200.22.25 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Ohio
      • Canton, Ohio, United States
        • 1200.22.6 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
        • 1200.22.7 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • South Carolina
      • Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
        • 1200.22.22 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States
        • 1200.22.31 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    • Washington
      • Renton, Washington, United States
        • 1200.22.40 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Seattle, Washington, United States
        • 1200.22.33 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC Stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) adenocarcinoma or Stage IV adenocarcinoma.
  2. Presence of activating mutation(s) in exon 18 to exon 21 of the EGFR-receptor confirmed by direct DNA sequencing of NSCLC tumor tissue.
  3. Progressive disease following a first line cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen or have recurrent disease after prior neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients who have not received first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy can be enrolled in stage 2 of the trial, if the criteria for entering stage 2 are met.
  4. Patients with at least one tumor lesion that can accurately be measured by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in at least one dimension with longest diameter to be recorded as 20 mm using conventional techniques or 10 mm with spiral CT scan.
  5. Male or female patient aged 18 years.
  6. Life expectancy of at least three (3) months.
  7. Written informed consents that is consistent with ICH-GCP guidelines.
  8. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0, 1 or 2.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. More than one (1) prior cytotoxic chemotherapy treatment regimen for relapsed or metastatic NSCLC.
  2. Chemo-, hormone- (other than Megace®) or immunotherapy within the past 4 weeks or within less than four half-lives of the previous drug prior to treatment with the trial drug and/or persistence of toxicities of prior anticancer therapies which are deemed to be clinically relevant.
  3. Previous treatment with erlotinib (Tarceva®), gefitinib (Iressa®) or any other EGFR inhibiting small molecule or antibody.
  4. Brain metastases, which are symptomatic; patients with treated, asymptomatic brain metastases are eligible with stable brain disease for at least four (4) weeks without the requirement for steroids or anti-epileptic therapy.
  5. Significant or recent acute gastrointestinal disorders with diarrhea as a major symptom e.g., Crohns disease, malabsorption, or CTCAE Grade >2 diarrhea of any etiology at baseline.
  6. Patients who have any other life-threatening illness or organ system dysfunction, which in the opinion of the investigator, would either compromise patient safety or interfere with the evaluation of the safety of the test drug.
  7. Other malignancies diagnosed within the past five (5) years (other than non-melanomatous skin cancer and in situ cervical cancer).
  8. Radiotherapy within the past 2 weeks prior to treatment with the trial drug.
  9. Patients with any serious active infection (i.e., requiring an IV antibiotic, antifungal, or antiviral agents).
  10. Patients with known HIV, active hepatitis B or active hepatitis C.
  11. Known or suspected active drug or alcohol abuse.
  12. Women of child-bearing potential or men who are able to father a child unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception during the trial.
  13. Pregnancy or breast feeding.
  14. Patient unable to comply with the protocol.
  15. History of clinically significant or uncontrolled cardiac disease, including congestive heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, including New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification of 3.
  16. Cardiac left ventricular function with resting ejection fraction of less than 50% measured by multigated blood pool imaging of the heart (MUGA scan) or echocardiogram.
  17. QTc interval greater than 0.47 second.
  18. Prior treatment with anthracyclines with a cumulative dose of doxorubicin (or equivalent) greater than 400 mg/m2.
  19. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 1500/mm3.
  20. Platelet count less than 100 000 /mm3.
  21. Bilirubin greater than 1.5 mg / dl (greater than 26 micromol / L, SI unit equivalent).
  22. Aspartate amino transferase (AST) or alanine amino transferase (ALT) greater than three times the upper limit of normal (if related to liver metastases greater than five times the upper limit of normal).
  23. Serum creatinine greater than 1.5 times of the upper normal limit or calculated/measured creatinine clearance equal or less than 45 ml / min.
  24. Patients with known pre-existing interstitial lung disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: BIBW 2992
Patients start continuous once daily oral treatment of BIBW 2992 at high dose, until progression or undue Adverse Events (AEs) develop. Patients can be dose-reduced up to two times if needed after temporary discontinuation of treatment due to drug-related AEs. After protocol amendment 2 (17 Dec 2008), the starting dose of BIBW 2992 was reduced to a medium dose, with 2 possible dose reductions if needed after discontinuation due to drug-related AEs.
Drug: BIBW 2992
This is an open label study. Patients are treated with BIBW 2992 until disease progression or undue AEs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Response (OR) as Determined by RECIST 1.0
Time Frame: Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Objective response (OR) was assessed for all treated patients by independent review as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0. OR included complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), where CR or PR must have been confirmed by a subsequent response in ≥28 days.
Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Benefit as Determined by RECIST 1.0
Time Frame: Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Clinical benefit was evaluated according to RECIST 1.0 by independent review assessment. Patients whose best RECIST 1.0 assessment was stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), or complete response (CR) were considered to have derived a clinical benefit from treatment.
Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Duration of Clinical Benefit
Time Frame: Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Duration of clinical benefit (disease control) as per independent review was defined as the time from the start of treatment to the time of progression or death (whichever occurred first), among patients with evidence of SD, PR or CR.
Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Duration of Objective Response
Time Frame: Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Duration of objective response (OR) was measured from the time the criteria for CR or PR (whichever was documented first) were first met until the first date that progressive disease or death (or date of censoring for PFS) was objectively documented as per independent review.
Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Time to Objective Response
Time Frame: Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.

Time to objective response was defined as the number of days from the start of treatment to the first recorded objective response. Patients who did not experience objective response during the study were censored at the time of treatment discontinuation.

The results are provided as the percentage of participants for this Outcome Measure.
Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Progression-free Survival
Time Frame: Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Progression-free survival (PFS) as per independent review was defined as the duration of time from the start of treatment until the day of objective tumor progression was confirmed by tumor imaging (Progressive Disease according to RECIST 1.0) or death, whichever came first. Patients with unknown progression status or unknown date of progression were reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Patients known to be alive without progression at the end of the trial or the last follow-up visit were censored at the date of the last imaging when the patient was known to be alive and progression-free. Medians are calculated from the Kaplan-Meier estimates and 95% confidence intervals, using Greenwood's standard error estimate.
Response assessment is done at end of Week 4 (after Course 1), Week 8 (after Course 2), Week 12 (after Course 3) and at 8-week intervals thereafter, up to 93 months.
Overall Survival Time
Time Frame: Start of treatment to time to all death, up to 93 months
Overall survival time (OS) was also evaluated and was defined as the duration of time from start of treatment to time of death up to 93 months, regardless of the cause of death. Medians are calculated from the Kaplan-Meier estimates and 95% confidence intervals, using Greenwood's standard error estimate.
Start of treatment to time to all death, up to 93 months
Cpre,ss,29
Time Frame: -0:05h (pre-dose) on Day 29
Predose concentration of the analyte in plasma at steady state immediately before administration of the 29th dose (Cpre,ss,29).
-0:05h (pre-dose) on Day 29
Safety of BIBW 2992 as Indicated by Incidence of Specified Adverse Events.
Time Frame: First administration of trial medication until 28 days after last administration of trial medication, up to 93 months.
Safety of afatinib as indicated by incidence of specified adverse events: skin reactions (a preferred term of the system organ class: Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders) and gastrointestinal (GI) (a system organ class).
First administration of trial medication until 28 days after last administration of trial medication, up to 93 months.
Safety of BIBW 2992 as Indicated by Intensity and Incidence of Worst Adverse Events Graded According to NCI CTCAE Version 3.0
Time Frame: First administration of trial medication until 28 days after last administration of trial medication, up to 93 months.
Safety of afatinib as indicated by intensity and incidence of worst adverse events graded according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) Version 3.0 (R04-0474).
First administration of trial medication until 28 days after last administration of trial medication, up to 93 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boehringer Ingelheim

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 3, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 3, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 5, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1200.22

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Clinical Trials on BIBW 2992

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings