Short Transverse Versus Conventional Hockey Stick Incision in Kidney Transplantation
"Short Transverse" Versus Conventional "Hockey Stick" Incision in Kidney Transplantation
Today the minimal invasive access is used for a lot of different operations. This technique takes the advantage of less postoperative pain, better cosmetic results, and a lower surgical complication rate (e.g. hernia, wound infection).
Especially patients under immunosuppressive therapy could benefit from this technique. First results in minimally invasive kidney transplantation indicate that it may be performed quickly and safely. Benefits are expectable on postoperative pain, recovery, and surgical complications. Another retrospective study showed lower rates of hernia, abdominal wall relaxations, and a better postoperative cosmetic.
The aim of this study is to compare the classic hockey stick incision with a minimal invasive incision in a randomized clinical trial.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Berne, Switzerland, 3010
- University Hospital Inselspital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age equal or over 18 years
- Sole kidney transplantation
- Consent form
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
Short Transverse Incision
|
Short Transverse Incision for kidney transplantation
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Hockey Stick Incision
|
Hockey Stick Incision for kidney transplantation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
QoR (Quality of Recovery) - Score
Time Frame: preoperative, day 1/3/5/7 postoperative
|
preoperative, day 1/3/5/7 postoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Operation time
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
intraoperative
|
|
Quality of Life by SF (Short Form) 36
Time Frame: preoperative, day 7, week 4, month 6 postoperative
|
preoperative, day 7, week 4, month 6 postoperative
|
|
Warm ischemic time
Time Frame: intraoperative
|
intraoperative
|
|
Postoperative pain measured by VAS (visual analog scale) and amount of analgesia
Time Frame: day 1/2/3/4/5/6/7 postoperative
|
day 1/2/3/4/5/6/7 postoperative
|
|
Surgical complications
Time Frame: day 7, week 4, month 6, month 12 postoperative
|
day 7, week 4, month 6, month 12 postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Uta Herden, MD, University Hospital Inselspital, Berne
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 220/07
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.