Single Balloon Catheter Compared With Double Balloon Catheter for Ripening of the Unfavorable Cervix
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Afula, Israel
- Department of Ob/Gyn, Ha'Emek Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Induction of labor is indicated
- Gestational age between 24 - 42 weeks
- Singleton pregnancy
- Bishop score less than 7
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any contraindication for vaginal delivery
- Previous cesarean delivery
- Low lying placenta
- Rupture of membranes
- Fetal malformations incompatible with life
- intrauterine fetal death
- Amnionitis
Genital viral infection (HIV, hepatitis C virus
, hepatitis B virus)
- Allergy to latex
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
Ripening of the unfavorable cervix is done with Single balloon catheter (Foley catheter)
|
Single balloon catheter
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Ripening of the unfavorable cervix is done with double balloon catheter (Atad catheter)
|
Double balloon catheter
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Average Time in Hours From Insertion of the Catheter Until Delivery
Time Frame: At the end of the study
|
At the end of the study
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
To Compare Mode of Delivery, Catheter's Side Effects and Woman's Satisfaction Between the Groups
Time Frame: At the end of the study
|
At the end of the study
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Raed Salim, MD, Department of Ob/Gyn, Ha'Emek Medical Center, Afula, and Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sciscione AC, McCullough H, Manley JS, Shlossman PA, Pollock M, Colmorgen GH. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jan;180(1 Pt 1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70149-3.
- Lyndrup J, Nickelsen C, Weber T, Molnitz E, Guldbaek E. Induction of labour by balloon catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion (BCEAS): a randomised comparison with PGE2 vaginal pessaries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994 Mar 15;53(3):189-97. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(94)90118-x.
- Manabe Y, Manabe A, Takahashi A. F prostaglandin levels in amniotic fluid during balloon-induced cervical softening and labor at term. Prostaglandins. 1982 Feb;23(2):247-56. doi: 10.1016/0090-6980(82)90052-1.
- James C, Peedicayil A, Seshadri L. Use of the Foley catheter as a cervical ripening agent prior to induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1994 Dec;47(3):229-32. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(94)90566-5.
- St Onge RD, Connors GT. Preinduction cervical ripening: a comparison of intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel versus the Foley catheter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Feb;172(2 Pt 1):687-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90594-4.
- Dalui R, Suri V, Ray P, Gupta I. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Apr;84(4):362-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00662.x.
- Atad J, Bornstein J, Calderon I, Petrikovsky BM, Sorokin Y, Abramovici H. Nonpharmaceutical ripening of the unfavorable cervix and induction of labor by a novel double balloon device. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan;77(1):146-52.
- Salim R, Zafran N, Nachum Z, Garmi G, Kraiem N, Shalev E. Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):79-86. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318220e4b7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0007-08-EMC
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.