Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic HSCT From HLA Matched Related or Unrelated Donors for the Treatment of Low Grade B Cell Malignancies

June 22, 2017 updated by: Racquel Innis-Shelton, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

UAB 0775 Phase II Trial of Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Protocol From HLA Matched Related Donors for The Treatment of Patients With Low Grade B Cell Malignancies

A non-myeloablative treatment strategy and uniform selection criteria will enable patients with a variety of low grade B-Cell malignancies to attain long term disease control without unacceptably high treatment related mortality.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Non myeloablative transplant aims to achieve the immunological advantage of graft versus tumor effect as conventional myeloablative therapy without causing high treatment related toxicities. Non myeloablative transplant has been gaining wider acceptance as a way to achieve longer disease free and over all survival in patients with low grade B-cell malignancies, which otherwise is an incurable disease. Recent studies of non-myeloablative HSCT have demonstrated the powerful effect of graft versus leukemia alone against myeloma and other malignant B-cell malignancies if the transplant is performed for low grade, low volume disease.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
5

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35249-6979
        • University of Alabama in Birmingham BMT/CT Program Outpatient Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stage II or III non-progressive disease Multiple Myeloma.
  • CLL/SLL, and low grade Hodgkin Lymphomas that are in a very good partial response or complete response with non-progressive disease.
  • ≤ 70 years old.
  • Eligible and willing HLA matched related donor.
  • Bilirubin <2xULN.
  • ALT and AST <3xULN.
  • LVEF > 40%.
  • Creatinine Clearance >40mL/min.
  • Pulmonary function DLCO corrected to ≥ 70%.
  • Minimum performance score of 70%.
  • Platelet count >130 x103 micro L.
  • LDH ≤1.5xULN.
  • No proceeding co-morbid condition that significantly increases the risk of severe regimen related toxicity.
  • No uncontrolled infections.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age >70 years old.
  • Performance status <70%.
  • Uncontrolled infections or is HIV positive
  • Prior malignancies that are felt to have a <80% probability of being cured.
  • Pregnant, breastfeeding, or refuse to use contraceptive techniques during and for 12 months following transplant.
  • Prior Allograft
  • History of rapidly growing disease at diagnosis or at any progression or have MDS.
  • No eligible and willing HLA matched donor.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Non Myeloablative Treatment

Non-myeloablative Transplant Conditioning Chemotherapy :

Fludarabine - 30 mg/m2/day x 3 days Total Body Irradiation - 200cGy x1 dose Infusion of Stem Cells - On Day 0 pts will received an infusion of HLA matched sibling donor stem cells. Dose is determined by the volume of cells obtained from donor. Minimum dose is 2x10*6 CD34+ cells per kilogram of recipient weight.
Drug: Fludarabine
Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day x 3 days
Radiation: Total Body Irradiation
TBI 200cGy x1 dose on transplant day
Other: Infusion of Stem Cells
On Day 0 pts will received an infusion of HLA matched sibling donor stem cells. Dose is determined by the volume of cells obtained from donor. Minimum dose is 2x10*6 CD34+ cells per kilogram of recipient weight.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progressive Free Survival Post Transplant
Time Frame: 100 days post transplant
subjects surviving without disease progression at 100 days after transplant as evidenced by decreased disease and no new disease showing on radiologic scans and / or bone marrow pathology.
100 days post transplant
Progressive Free Survival Post Transplant
Time Frame: 180 days post transplant
Subjects surviving without disease progression 180 days after transplant as evidenced by decreased disease and no new disease showing on radiologic scans and / or bone marrow pathology.
180 days post transplant
Progressive Free Survival Post Transplant
Time Frame: 365 days post transplant
Subjects surviving without disease progression 365 days after transplant as evidenced by decreased disease and no new disease showing on radiologic scans and / or bone marrow pathology.
365 days post transplant
Progression Free Survival Post Transplant
Time Frame: 2 years post transplant
Subjects surviving without disease progression 2 years after transplant as evidenced by no new disease showing on radiologic scans and / or bone marrow pathology.
2 years post transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-relapse Treatment Related Mortality
Time Frame: Within 100 days post transplant
Death related to treatment without relapse within 100 days after transplant
Within 100 days post transplant
Number of Participants With Detectable Donor Chimerism at up to 100 Days Post Transplant
Time Frame: Post transplant up to 100 days post transplant
Measured by number of participants that have chimerism study results that show the number of donor cells and the number of recipient cells present in the blood after post-transplant lymphocyte infusions continue to be predominately either donor or recipient.
Post transplant up to 100 days post transplant
Composite Incidence of Acute and Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Time Frame: Up to 100 days post transplant.
Up to 100 days post transplant.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: William P. Vaughan, MD, University of Alabama in Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 10, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 14, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 24, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 22, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • F080429003
  • UAB-0775 (Other Identifier: UAB Cancer Center study number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings