Self Administered Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Self Administered CBT for IBS: A Multisite Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
-
-
New York
-
Buffalo, New York, United States, 14215
- University at Buffalo School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or female patients aged 18 to 70 years (inclusive);
- All ethnic groups;
- Meet Rome III criteria for IBS with symptoms of at least moderate severity (at least 2 days per week);
- Ability to understand and provide informed consent;
- With the exception of antibiotics, participant is willing to remain on a stable dose only through the 4-week pretreatment baseline period prior to randomization;
- Participant either not taking medications or if taking medications willing to suspend starting any new medications only during the initial 4-week pretreatment baseline period;
- Participant demonstrates an ability to speak understand and read, English a the sixth grade level or higher;
- Willingness to be randomized to CBT or Support/Education to which s/he has been assigned to to adhere to protocol requirements;
- Participant is willing to attend regularly scheduled therapy session during active phase of the trial;
- Participant is willing to be contacted and scheduled for follow-up assessment at week 12 and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the conclusion of acute treatment phase;
- Participant is willing and able to enter symptom information into an assigned portable computer and complete questionnaires through treatment and at regularly scheduled follow ups
- Participant has access to a telephone; and
- Participant is willing and able to provide adequate information for locator purposes.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of current structural or biochemical abnormalities or medication use that better explain the participant's IBS symptoms (e.g. IBD);
- Evidence of a current infection or infection of any type within the 2 weeks prior to the study gastroenterologists' evaluation which would obscure the presentation of IBS symptoms. In such cases the baseline can be delayed until 2 weeks after complete recovery.
- Participant has received antibiotics (e.g. rifaximin and or neomycin) specifically targeted to treat IBS symptoms within the past 3 months. In this instance eligibility will be suspended for 12 weeks from the initial date the antibiotic was consumed.
- Participant has undergone previous abdominal surgery that would have caused significant alternation of the anatomy/physiology of the digestive/GI tract, which adequately explains GI symptoms;
- Participant has been diagnosed and/or treated for malignancy in the past 5 years with the exception of localized basal or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin;
- Participant has an unstable extraintestinal medical condition whose immediate or foreseeable treatment needs (e.g., hospitalization, conflicting physician visits) would realistically interfere with study demands (e.g., consistent attendance at treatment sessions and/or ability to participate in telephone interventions) or may affect the interpretation of clinical efficacy data;
- Participant has a major psychiatric disorder, which in the opinion of the senior clinical staff may impede conduct of the clinical trial. These disorders include but are not limited to major depression diagnosis with a high risk of suicidal behavior (i.e. intent or plan), alcohol or substance abuse/dependence within the past year, a lifetime history of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder or gross cognitive impairments;
- Participant has other conditions which in the opinion of the senior clinical staff would influence negatively the conduct of the clinical trial;
- Participant is currently receiving targeted psychotherapy for IBS and is unwilling or unable to discontinue his/her treatment for the acute treatment phase of this study;
- Participant is unable to complete all scheduled screening visits; and participant is inaccessible for interventions and/or follow-up evaluations.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: MC-CBT
Self Administered Cognitive Behavior Therapy
|
This 4 session treatment is aimed at controlling symptoms by changing specific behaviors found to aggravate IBS
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard-CBT
Therapist Administered Cognitive Behavior Therapy
|
This 10 session treatment is aimed at controlling symptoms by changing specific behaviors found to aggravate IBS
|
|
Active Comparator: Education/Support
Behavioral Patient Education/Counseling
|
This 4 session treatment aims at controlling symptoms through support and the provision of information about IBS symptoms, how it is diagnosed, its causes, and treatment options and a collaborative, relationship between the patient and doctor
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement Scale (CGI-I; Patient Version)
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-Up, 3-Month Follow-Up, 6-Month Follow-Up, 9-Month Follow-Up and 12-Month Follow-Up
|
The CGI-I is a single-item, 7-point centered scale that integrates symptom severity and improvement since the start of treatment.
Specific IBS-based anchor points were used, as is the convention for multi-symptom disease states.
Response range from 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved), with higher scores indicating greater symptom improvement.
Participants who respond 6 (much improved) or 7 (very much improved) are classified as treatment responders.
|
2-Week Follow-Up, 3-Month Follow-Up, 6-Month Follow-Up, 9-Month Follow-Up and 12-Month Follow-Up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline on the IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2-Week Follow-Up, 3-Month Follow-Up, 6-Month Follow-Up, 9-Month Follow-Up and 12-Month Follow-Up
|
The IBS-SSS is a 5-item instrument used to measure severity of abdominal pain, frequency of abdominal pain, severity of abdominal distention, dissatisfaction with bowel habits, and interference with QOL.
For four of the items, respondents mark a point on a 101 mm visual analogue scale to indicate their response to that item.
The proportional distance from zero is the score (ranging from 0 to 100) assigned for that scale.
The other item asks the number of days out of 10 the patient experiences abdominal pain and the answer is multiplied by 10 to create a 0 to 100 metric.
The five items are summed and the total scores range from 0-500, with higher scores signifying more severe symptoms [mild (<175), moderate (175-300), severe (>300)].
A decrease of 50 points on the IBS-SSS is considered clinically significant.
|
Baseline, 2-Week Follow-Up, 3-Month Follow-Up, 6-Month Follow-Up, 9-Month Follow-Up and 12-Month Follow-Up
|
|
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ)
Time Frame: 2-Week Follow-Up
|
The CSQ is an 8-item questionnaire that measures patient satisfaction with treatment.
Scores range from 8 to 32 with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with treatment.
|
2-Week Follow-Up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Lackner, PsyD, State University of New York at Buffalo
- Principal Investigator: Laurie Keefer, Ph.D., Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Study Chair: Jeffrey Lackner, Psy.D., State University of New York at Buffalo
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Jacobs JP, Gupta A, Bhatt RR, Brawer J, Gao K, Tillisch K, Lagishetty V, Firth R, Gudleski GD, Ellingson BM, Labus JS, Naliboff BD, Lackner JM, Mayer EA. Cognitive behavioral therapy for irritable bowel syndrome induces bidirectional alterations in the brain-gut-microbiome axis associated with gastrointestinal symptom improvement. Microbiome. 2021 Nov 30;9(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01188-6.
- Lackner JM, Jaccard J, Keefer L, Brenner DM, Firth RS, Gudleski GD, Hamilton FA, Katz LA, Krasner SS, Ma CX, Radziwon CD, Sitrin MD. Improvement in Gastrointestinal Symptoms After Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2018 Jul;155(1):47-57. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.063. Epub 2018 Apr 25. Erratum In: Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):1281.
- Lackner JM, Keefer L, Jaccard J, Firth R, Brenner D, Bratten J, Dunlap LJ, Ma C, Byroads M; IBSOS Research Group. The Irritable Bowel Syndrome Outcome Study (IBSOS): rationale and design of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with 12 month follow up of self- versus clinician-administered CBT for moderate to severe irritable bowel syndrome. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Nov;33(6):1293-310. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- DK77738
- U01DK077738 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Study Protocol
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
- Clinical Study Report (CSR)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.