Safety and Efficacy of a Violet Visible Light Blocking Intraocular Lens (IOL)
Clinical Evaluation of a Modified Light Transmission IOL
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Arizona
-
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85054
- Patrick Aiello, M.D.
-
-
Arkansas
-
Rogers, Arkansas, United States, 72756
- Randall E. Cole, M.D.
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
- Aron Rose, M.D.
-
-
Minnesota
-
Bloomington, Minnesota, United States, 55420
- Y. Ralph Chu, M.D.
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64133
- Steven Silverstein, M.D.
-
-
Oregon
-
Roseburg, Oregon, United States, 97470
- Jon-Marc Weston, M.D.
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, United States, 16066
- William Christie, M.D.
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19148
- Mark Blecher, M.D.
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
- Robert L. Bahr, M.D.
-
-
South Dakota
-
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57105
- Vance Thompson, M.D.
-
-
Washington
-
Lacey, Washington, United States, 98503
- Jay Rudd, M.D.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years of age or older
- Bilateral cataracts for which phacoemulsification extraction and posterior IOL implantation has been planned
- Visual potential in both eyes of 20/30 Snellen or better after cataract removal and IOL implantation
- Preoperative corneal astigmatism of 1.5 diopters or less
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of systemic or ocular medications that may affect vision
- Uncontrolled systemic or recurrent ocular disease
- Requiring an intraocular lens <15.0 or >26.0 diopters
- Abnormal results with the Farnsworth-Munsell D-15 and/or Ishihara color plates
- History of ocular trauma or prior ocular surgery
- Known pathology that may affect visual acuity or visual field
- Corneal abnormalities
- Pupil abnormalities
- Capsule or zonular abnormalities
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ZV9003
modified light transmission intraocular lens
|
violet visible light blocking acrylic intraocular lens
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: ZA9003
monofocal acrylic intraocular lens
|
conventional hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity
Time Frame: One year
|
Snellen Equivalent visual acuity of 20/40 or better
|
One year
|
|
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity
Time Frame: One Year
|
Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or better at one year
|
One Year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Contrast Sensitivity
Time Frame: 4-6 months
|
Contrast sensitivity is the measurement of how faded an image may become before it can clearly be seen.
Contrast sensitivity was measured in photopic and mesopic conditions at the following spatial frequencies: 3.0, 6.0, 12.0, and 18 cpd (cycles per degree).
Contrast sensitivity is measured in log units.
A higher value for the logarithmic units translates to better contrast sensitivity.
|
4-6 months
|
|
Subject Satisfaction - Subjects Satisfied With Overall Eyesight Rated as "Good" or "Excellent".
Time Frame: One Year
|
Subjects indicating a subjective response to a multiple choice question, "At the present time, would you say your eyesight using both eyes (with glasses or contact lenses, if you wear them) is excellent, good, fair, poor, or very poor or are you completely blind?", on a multi-item questionnaire administered by interviewer to determine subject satisfaction with their overall visual outcome at the one year visit.
|
One Year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Roger F. Steinert, M.D., University of California, Irvine, Dept. of Ophthalmology
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- BBLK-102-PRSM
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.