Efficacy and Safety Study of Fostamatinib Disodium Tablets to Treat T-Cell Lymphoma

August 9, 2016 updated by: Rigel Pharmaceuticals

Phase II, Multicenter, Simon Two-Stage Study of Fostamatinib Disodium in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma

Patients meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in two stages, 19 patients in Stage 1 and 36 patients in Stage 2. Stage 2 will enroll if 4 or more patients exhibit a response at Week 8 or later in the study. All enrolled patients will be treated with Fostamatinib Disodium until disease progression. Efficacy will be assessed by tumor measurements using CT and PET (when indicated) scans and physical exam at baseline, and scans and physical exam of all disease-involved areas every 8 weeks until progression. Safety will be assessed by periodic physical exams, clinical laboratory studies, and adverse events. All patients will have a follow-up visit 30 days following last study drug treatment. Blood samples for PK assessment will be obtained from all patients enrolled in Stage 1 at protocol defined intervals.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Up to 61 patients (male and female) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled into this trial in two stages. All enrolled patients will be treated with R788 at 200 mg PO bid until disease progression. In the initial stage of the study, a total of 19 patients will be enrolled and treated with Fostamatinib Disodium. Should at least 4 patients exhibit a response at Week 8 or later of the study, the second stage of 36 patients will open to enrollment. Efficacy will be assessed by CT and PET scans (when indicated) and physical exam at baseline, and CT scans and physical exam of all disease-involved areas every 8 weeks until progression. Safety will be assessed by periodic physical exams, clinical laboratory studies, and adverse events. All patients will have a follow-up visit 30 days following last study drug treatment. Blood samples for PK assessment will be obtained from all patients enrolled in Stage 1 at protocol-defined intervals. Patients with accessible tumor tissue will be asked to undergo a biopsy for a fresh tissue sample for assessment of Syk activity in tumor tissue. Archived tissue samples from the initial diagnostic biopsy and the most recent biopsy for lymphoma will be obtained in the event a fresh tumor biopsy cannot be obtained. Patients who have accessible tumor tissue will be asked to consent to a second tumor biopsy at Week 8, to assess the impact of Fostamatinib Disodium treatment on the activity of Syk and its downstream markers. All baseline fresh or archived tumor tissue samples will undergo central pathology review to confirm the diagnosis of TCL.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
18

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E6
        • Research Site
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2M9
        • Research Site
  • United States
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • Research Site
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Research Site
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Research Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Research Site
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Research Site
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
        • Research Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Research Site
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must give written informed consent to participate in this study by signing an IRB/EC-approved Informed Consent Form (ICF) prior to admission to this study.
  • Males and females, 18 years of age or older.
  • Patients must have histologically proven T-cell lymphoma (TCL).
  • Patients must have documented disease progression after receiving at least one prior therapeutic regimen and must be patients for whom no known curative therapy exists.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a history of, or a concurrent, clinically significant illness, medical condition or laboratory abnormality that, in the investigator's opinion, could affect the conduct of the study.
  • Has a B-cell lymphoma, primary CNS lymphoma, or known lymphomatous involvement of the CNS, or any other NK/T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.
  • Has uncontrolled or poorly controlled hypertension.
  • Has had recent (within 1 month prior to Day 1) serious surgery or uncontrolled infectious disease.
  • Has any concurrent malignancy requiring treatment.
  • Has a known positive test for Hepatitis B surface Ag, Hepatitis C, or HIV.
  • Has laboratory abnormalities.
  • Has difficulty swallowing or malabsorption.
  • Has an ECOG performance status > 2.
  • Has not recovered from adverse effects related to last prior therapy for lymphoma.
  • Has had an allotransplantation within 90 days prior to Day 1 of treatment.
  • Has been treated with a CYP3A4 inducer/inhibitor within 3 days prior to Day 1 of treatment or is expected to require treatment with CYP3A4 inducer/inhibitor during the course of the study.
  • Has received systemic steroids at a dose greater than the equivalent of 10 mg/day of prednisone within 7 days prior to Day 1 of treatment.
  • Has received any other investigational therapy within 5 half-lives of the agent or 2 weeks of Day 1 of treatment, whichever is longer.
  • Is a female of childbearing potential unless menopausal, surgically sterile, or willing to use an effective method of birth control, (oral contraceptive, mechanical barrier, long-acting hormonal agent), during the study and for 30 days thereafter.
  • Is pregnant or lactating.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 1
Drug: Fostamatinib Disodium
200 mg PO BID
Other Names:
  • Code Designation: R935788 Sodium Hexahydrate
  • USAN Name: Fostamatinib Disodium
  • CAS No.: 914295-16-2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Primary Efficacy Endpoint for This Study is Overall Regressive Response Rate (ORRR): Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Regressive Stable Disease (RSD).
Time Frame: Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Overall regressive response rate (ORRR) is the proportion of patients with a best response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) (per Cheson 2007), or Regressive Stable Disease (RSD) defined as regressive disease that does not meet the criteria for partial response.
Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Benefit Rate is the Proportion of Patients With Best Response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD).
Time Frame: Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Clinical benefit rate is the proportion of patients with best response of Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), or Stable Disease (SD).
Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Overall Response Rate (ORR) is the Proportion of Patients With a Best Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).
Time Frame: Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Overall response rate (ORR) is the proportion of patients with a best response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR).
Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Duration of Overall Response is the Time From First Documentation of Complete or Partial Response, Whichever Occurs Earlier, to Discontinuation of Study Drug.
Time Frame: Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)
Duration of Overall Response is the time from first documentation of Complete or Partial Response (Cheson 2007), whichever occurs earlier, to discontinuation of study drug.
Serial tumor assessments were taken at baseline (within 28 days of the start of treatment), and re-evaluated at Day 57, and every 8weeks therafter or to confirm response . (Maximum duration of treatment 182 days, Maximum duration of follow-up 217 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rigel Pharmaceuticals

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Jeffrey Skolnik, MD, AstraZeneca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 21, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 24, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 25, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 9, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D4300C00024
  • C-935788-017 (Other Identifier: Rigel Pharmaceuticals)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings