Dose-ranging Study of Two Doses of Tranexamic Acid During Cardiac Surgery (Exacylcardio)

September 22, 2016 updated by: Hopital Foch

Comparison of Two Tranexamic Acid Dose Regimens on Transfusion Needs During Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Cardiac surgery with CardioPulmonary Bypass (CPB) exposes to per and postoperative bleeding, and may lead to allogenic blood transfusion re-intervention and many adverse outcomes. Prophylactic use of tranexamic Acid (TA) has been shown to decrease blood loss and blood transfusion during cardiac surgery.There currently are multiple dosing regimens for TA for cardiac surgery.Preliminary dose-response study has shown that low prophylactic dose of TA would be as accurate for haemostatic efficacy as higher dose.

The primary objective of this tri-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomised trial is to compare two administrations and dosing regimens of TA during cardiac surgery with CPB on the perioperative blood loss.

In addition to the clinical study, a pharmacokinétic/pharmacodynamic study will be conducted.

Patients are divided in two groups: low and high risk surgery. Methods: After written informed consent, patients are randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. The low dose TA group is: 10 mg/kg TA given over 15 min, followed by an infusion of 1 mg/kg/h throughout the operation, and 1 mg/kg into the CPB prime volume. The high dose group is :30 mg/kg TA given over 15 min, followed by an infusion of 16 mg/kg/h throughout the operation, and 2 mg/kg into the CPB prime volume. Hemodynamic and anaesthesia care will be as usual. A blood salvage device will be systematically used. The triggers for transfusion will be: red blood cells: haemoglobin less than 8 g/dl or 6 g/dl during CBP; Plasma: PT less than 50% or INR more than 1.5; platelets: platelets count less than 50/70 G/mm3; fibrinogen: fibrinogen less than 1g/l . All patients will receive standard anaesthesia and perioperative care.

In 60 consecutive patients in the principal investigator center, 5 blood samples will allow to assess the plasmatic concentration of tranexamic acid at different time of the surgery procedure:

  1. Baseline
  2. 5 min after the loading dose
  3. 10 min after the beginning of bypass
  4. at the discontinuation of the infusion
  5. 1 hour after the discontinuation Plasmatic dosage will be assessed using a high performance liquid chromatography technique.

Patients will be stratified in two groups for the statistical analysis; low and high risk surgery. Analysis will be in intention to treat. 300 patients should be recruited in each group to detect an absolute difference of respectively 10% (low risk cardiac surgery) and 20% (high risk cardiac surgery) in the number of patients exposed to allogenic blood transfusion between patients receiving high dose TA regimen and those receiving low dose TA regimen, assuming a power of 80% and a two-tailed value less than 0.05.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
600

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Besancon, France, 25030
        • department of anaesthesiology, CHU Jean Minjoz
      • Bordeaux, France
        • department of anesthesiology, Haut Leveque Hospital
      • Paris, France, 75018
        • department of anesthesiology, Bichat Hospital
      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Hôpital Foch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any type of cardiac surgical procedure requiring CPB (including coronary artery bypass grafting, valve repair or replacement, aortic surgery, endocarditis).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency surgery, age < 18 years old, pregnancy, history of allergy to TA, history of seizure or thromboembolism event, history of previous antifibrinolytic or thrombolytic therapy within 5 days of surgery, coagulation disorder, liver disease, renal failure (clearance < 30 ml/min), Jehovah witness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: high dose
Drug: tranexamic acid
10 mg/kg
Drug: tranexamic acid
30 mg/kg
Active Comparator: low dose
low dose tranexamic acid
Drug: tranexamic acid
10 mg/kg
Drug: tranexamic acid
30 mg/kg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary study outcome is the number of patients in each group exposed to allogenic blood transfusion during the first 7 days after surgery.
Time Frame: 7th day
7th day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of fresh plasma frozen units, platelets units needed for the 7 days , post operative blood loss in the 24 hours, needed or repeat surgery due to haemorrhage for the 24 hours following surgery, in-hospital death at 7 and 28 days.
Time Frame: 28th day
28th day
Relationship between blood loss during the first 24 hours following the surgery and plasmatic concentration of acid tranexamic
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hopital Foch

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Marc Fischler, MD, Hôpital Foch

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 15, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 23, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2008/27

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings