Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) As A Single Oral Agent In Selected Patients With Adenocarcinoma Of The Lung

December 19, 2018 updated by: Pfizer

A PHASE 2, OPEN-LABEL TRIAL OF DACOMITINIB (PF-00299804) IN SELECTED PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE LUNG

This study will explore the safety and efficacy of the oral PanHER inhibitor PF-00299804 in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung who are either non-smokers (<100 cigarette, cigar or pipe lifetime) or former light smokers ( less than 10 pack-years and stopped at least 15 years) or have known EGFR activating mutation; or patients with HER 2 amplification or mutation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
119

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • New Territories, Hong Kong
        • Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital
      • Shatin, NT, Hong Kong
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
    • NEW Territories
      • Tuen Mun, NEW Territories, Hong Kong
        • Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital
      • Tuen Mun, NEW Territories, Hong Kong
        • Department of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital
  • Japan
      • Aichi, Japan, 464-8681
        • Aichi cancer center central hospital Thoracic Oncology
    • Tokyo
      • Koto-Ku, Tokyo, Japan, 135-8550
        • The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR
  • Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Seoul National University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 120-752
        • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 135-710
        • SamsungMedicalCenter, Sungkyunkwan Univ School of Medicine
  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
  • United States
    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868-3298
        • University of California, Irvine
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center UC Irvine Medical Center
      • Pleasant Hill, California, United States, 94523
        • Bay Area Cancer Research Group, LLC
      • Salinas, California, United States, 93901
        • Pacific Cancer Care
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94110
        • San Francisco General Hospital
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Hospital
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Clinical Trials Office (CTO)
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33919
        • Florida Cancer Specialists
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham & Women's Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02210
        • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02210
        • Dana-Farber Cancer lnstitute
    • Missouri
      • Springfield, Missouri, United States, 65804
        • St. John's Hospital,
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10022
        • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794-9446
        • Stony Brook University Medical Center - Cancer Center
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • Investigational Drug Service, Pharmacy Department, UNC Hospitals
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-7600
        • UNC Hospitals, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599-2008
        • Division of Hemotology/Oncology
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Morris Cancer Center
    • North Dakota
      • Bismarck, North Dakota, United States, 58501
        • Legacy Pharma Research
      • Bismarck, North Dakota, United States, 58501
        • Mid Dakota Clinic, P.C
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37404
        • Chattanooga Oncology & Hematology Associates, P.C.
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203 (Administration)
        • Sarah Cannon Research Institute
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203(Pharmacy)
        • Sarah Cannon Research Institute
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23230
        • Virginia Cancer Institute
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
        • University of Washington Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Advanced adenocarcinoma of lung, measurable disease
  • Non-smoker, or former light (less than 10 pack years and stopped at least 15 years); OR
  • patients with known EGFR activating mutation regardless of smoking status
  • ECOG(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) 0-1.

Cohort B (select sites only): patients with HER2 amplified or HER2 mutation-positive NSCLC; may have had prior therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active brain metastases
  • Prior systemic therapy for advanced disease in Cohort A only. Cohort B can have had any number of prior lines of systemic therapy.
  • known EGFR wild type NSCLC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cohort A
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) in patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC or clinical characteristics defined above to enhance for EGFR mutated NSCLC
Drug: Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) at 45 mg daily or 30 mg daily by continuous oral dosing, to be escalated in tolerating patients to 45mg after at least 8 weeks of therapy (30 patients in Cohort A started at the lower dose).
Drug: Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)
In Cohort B, patients getting Dacomitinib for first line therapy started at 30 mg, but those who had prior anti-cancer therapy started at 45 mg.
Experimental: Cohort B
Dacomitinib in patients with HER2 mutated or amplified NSCLC
Drug: Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)
Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) at 45 mg daily or 30 mg daily by continuous oral dosing, to be escalated in tolerating patients to 45mg after at least 8 weeks of therapy (30 patients in Cohort A started at the lower dose).
Drug: Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)
In Cohort B, patients getting Dacomitinib for first line therapy started at 30 mg, but those who had prior anti-cancer therapy started at 45 mg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at Month 4: Cohort A
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 4
PFS at Month 4 was defined as percentage of participants who were alive and event free (event defined as progressive disease [PD] or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first) at 4 months after the first dose of study treatment. Documentation of progression was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0 (RECIST v1.0) criteria. PD = greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions.
Baseline up to Month 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) at Month 4: Cohort B
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 4
PFS at Month 4 was defined as percentage of patients who were alive and event free (event defined as PD or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first) at 4 months after the first dose of study treatment. Documentation of progression was based on RECIST v1.0 criteria. PD: >=20% increase in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions, or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions.
Baseline up to Month 4
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Baseline until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death, assessed at baseline, at the end of Cycle 1, Cycle 2, and then every other cycle.
PFS was defined as the time in months from the first dosing date to the date of first documentation of progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS was calculated as (first event date [if not reached, censored date as the last known event-free date] minus first dosing date plus 1) divided by 30.44. PD: >= 20% increase in the sum of the longest dimensions of the target lesions taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest dimensions recorded since the start of treatment, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Documentation of progression was determined from objective disease assessment based on RECIST v1.0 criteria.
Baseline until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death, assessed at baseline, at the end of Cycle 1, Cycle 2, and then every other cycle.
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time Frame: Baseline until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death, assessed at baseline, at the end of Cycle 1, Cycle 2, and then every other cycle.
BOR: best response recorded from treatment start until disease progression/recurrence based on RECIST v1.0. Complete Response (CR): disappearance of all lesions. Partial Response (PR): >=30% decrease in sum of longest diameters of target lesions taking as reference baseline sum of longest diameters, associated to non-progressive disease response for non target lesions. PD: >=20% increase in sum of longest diameters of target lesions taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters since treatment start, or appearance of >=1 new lesion, or unequivocal progression in non-target lesions. Stable disease (SD): neither shrinkage for CR/PR nor increase for PD taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters since treatment start. CR and PR had to be confirmed on a follow up imaging assessment >=4 weeks after the initial objective documentation of the response. SD must have met the SD criteria at least once after start of treatment in a minimum interval of 6 weeks.
Baseline until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death, assessed at baseline, at the end of Cycle 1, Cycle 2, and then every other cycle.
Duration of Response (DR)
Time Frame: Baseline until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death, assessed at baseline, at the end of Cycle 1, Cycle 2, and then every other cycle.
Time in months from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Duration of tumor response was calculated as (the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause [if not reached, censored date] minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1) divided by 30.44. DR was calculated for a subgroup of participants with a confirmed objective tumor response.
Baseline until progression or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy or death, assessed at baseline, at the end of Cycle 1, Cycle 2, and then every other cycle.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Randomization until death or last date known to be alive.
Time in months from the start of study treatment to date of death due to any cause. OS was calculated as (the death date or last alive date minus the date of first dose of study medication plus 1) divided by 30.44. Death was determined from adverse event data (where outcome was death) or from follow-up contact data (where the participant current status was death).
Randomization until death or last date known to be alive.
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Cycle [C]1 Day 1), up to C75
EORTC QLQ-C30: included functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), global health status (GHS), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used 4- point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). For GHS, functional scales, symptom scales and single items, scores were averaged, transformed to 0-100 scale; higher score=better level of functioning/health or greater degree of symptoms. Improvement was defined as a mean increase from baseline of ≥10 for GHS and functional scales or a mean decrease from baseline of ≤10 for symptom scales. Worsened was defined as a mean decrease from baseline of ≤10 for GHS and functional scales or a mean increase from baseline of ≥10 for symptom scales. Stable was a mean change from baseline of <10.
Baseline (Cycle [C]1 Day 1), up to C75
European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (C1D1) up to C75
QLQ-LC13 consisted of 13 questions relating to disease symptoms specific to lung cancer and treatment side effects typical of treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy experienced during past 1 week. The 13 questions comprised 1 multi-item scale for dyspnea and 10 single-item symptoms and side effects (coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, chest pain, arm pain, other pain, and medicine for pain ). Response range: (1) not at all to (4) very much. Scores for each item were transformed to 0 to 100, where higher symptom score = greater degree of symptoms. Results are reported for coughing, hemoptysis, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, chest pain, arm pain, and other pain. Improvement was defined as a mean decrease from baseline of ≤10. Worsened was defined as a mean increase from baseline of ≥10. Stable was a mean change from baseline of <10.
Baseline (C1D1) up to C75
Trough Plasma Concentrations (Ctrough) of Dacomitinib
Time Frame: Predose on C1D14, C2D1, C3D1, C4D1
Results for Ctrough were summarized as per the dose received during given cycle: no dose (treatment interruption at any cycle due to treatment-related toxicity), dacomitinib 15 mg (dacomitinib 15 mg at any cycle due to treatment-related toxicity at higher doses), 30 mg (dacomitinib 30 mg at any cycle as starting dose or dose reduction due to treatment-related toxicity at higher doses), 45 mg (dacomitinib 45 mg at any cycle as starting dose or dose escalation due to satisfactory toleration of dacomitinib 30 mg treatment).
Predose on C1D14, C2D1, C3D1, C4D1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 11, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 27, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 5, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 7, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • A7471017
  • 2011-002794-39 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Non-small Cell

Clinical Trials on Dacomitinib (PF-00299804)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings