Open-Label, Sequential Step, Safety and Efficacy Study to Determine the Optimal Single Dose of Ambisome for Patients With VL

January 20, 2016 updated by: Drugs for Neglected Diseases

Open-Label, Sequential Step, Safety and Efficacy Study to Determine the Optimal Single Dose of Ambisome for Patients With Visceral Leishmaniasis

This is a phase II/III open, comparative dose trial to find the lowest single dose of AmBisome for the treatment of primary, symptomatic visceral leishmaniasis(VL), in HIV negative patients. In this trial, the minimum effective dose will be determined in a sequential step, dose escalation design, which minimises the number of patients exposed to low, potentially inadequate doses and provides contemporaneous comparative data against the manufacturer's recommended dose schedule in this indication.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
124

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Ethiopia
      • Arba Minch, Ethiopia
        • Arba Minch LRTC
      • Gondar, Ethiopia
        • Gondar
  • Sudan
    • Gedarif
      • Kassab, Gedarif, Sudan
        • Kassab Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female adults and children aged 4 years or older with no upper age limit (in accordance with manufacturer's instructions)
  • Acute, symptomatic, VL proven by parasitological examination of splenic aspirate (or bone marrow aspirate) with initial parasite index of at least 2+
  • Haemoglobin >4g/dL
  • Fever for more than 2 weeks
  • Living within reachable distance of the trial site to enable attendance for follow-up visits
  • Written informed consent to participate (for children, by parent or guardian)
  • HIV negative status

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients 'in extremis' with signs/symptoms indicative of severe VL
  • Patients who have received any anti-leishmanial treatment within the last 6 months
  • Patients who have received any investigational (unlicensed) drugs during 6 months before recruitment
  • Known underlying chronic disease, such as severe cardiac, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic impairment.
  • Renal function tests (serum creatinine) outside the normal range
  • Liver function tests more than 3 times the normal range at study entry
  • Platelet count less than 40,000/ mm3
  • Known alcohol abuse
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Concomitant acute drug usage for malaria and bacterial infection, pneumonia within last 7 days
  • Known hypersensitivity to AmBisome or amphotericin B
  • Any other condition which may invalidate the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Ambisome control:
Ambisome, Total dose 21.0 mg given as 7 x 3mg on days 1,2,3,4,5, and 14 and 21
Drug: Liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome)
21.0 mg/kg total dose. Given iv as 3mg/kg/day on days 1,2,3,4,5, and 14 and 21
Other Names:
  • Ambisome
Drug: Liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome)
liposomal amphotericin b given intravenously as single dose at 7.5 mg/kg increasing to 10, 12.5 and 15.0mg/kg depending on results of interim analyses.
Other Names:
  • Ambisome
Experimental: Ambisome test
Single dose Ambisome in sequence(7.5 / 10.0/ 12.5 / 15.0mg)
Drug: Liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome)
21.0 mg/kg total dose. Given iv as 3mg/kg/day on days 1,2,3,4,5, and 14 and 21
Other Names:
  • Ambisome
Drug: Liposomal amphotericin B (Ambisome)
liposomal amphotericin b given intravenously as single dose at 7.5 mg/kg increasing to 10, 12.5 and 15.0mg/kg depending on results of interim analyses.
Other Names:
  • Ambisome

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary efficacy variable is parasitological clearance with no relapse at 6 months post treatment (ie definitive cure) assessed by clinical status and confirmed by splenic or bone marrow aspiration.
Time Frame: at 6 months post treatment
at 6 months post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Parasitological clearance at day 30.
Time Frame: Day 30
Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Drugs for Neglected Diseases

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Addis Ababa University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sisay Yifru, MD, Gondar University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 30, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 21, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 20, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AMBI 0106

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings