Routine Fetal RhD Genotyping for RhD- Pregnant Women (GENIFERH)

March 25, 2015 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Effectiveness of Routine Fetal RhD Genotyping for RhD- Pregnant Women

The study is divided in two sub-studies. The first one is an economical and performance comparison between two antenatal management strategies of RhD negative pregnant women: the first one will comprise non invasive RhD fetal typing during the second trimester of pregnancy (GENIFERH 1 RhD typing group), and the second will be a conventional management, i.e. without RHD fetal typing (GENIFERH 1 control group). The two groups will consist of 13 maternity wards spread over French territory. The second study (GENIFERH 2) is an evaluation of RhD fetal typing diagnostic performance and biological feasibility in routine antenatal practice with development of knew technical support; it will be based on more than 3500 fetal genotypings performed during one year by the five laboratories participating at the two studies.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Alloimmunisation against the RhD (RH) red cell surface antigen is the commonest cause of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. It can be avoided by anti D immunoglobulin administration (RhIg). At the end of year 2005, new recommendations about anti-D prophylaxis in France proposed that all RhD negative pregnant women should be given anti-D immunoglobulin at 28 weeks' gestation. However, about one third of these women would be carrying an RhD negative fetus and would receive the treatment unnecessarily. A non-invasive fetal RHD typing kit, CE labelled since June 2007, is available and could be proposed to all RhD negative pregnant women. Applicable from the end of the first trimester of pregnancy on fetal DNA isolated from maternal plasma, this assay allows RhIg to be specifically injected to unsensitized pregnancies with RhD positive fetus only, and to promote the use of antenatal RhIg prophylaxis in a rational approach with economical and ethical impact.The study is divided in two sub-studies. The first one is an economical and performance comparison between two antenatal management strategies of RhD negative pregnant women: the first one will comprise non invasive RhD fetal typing during the second trimester of pregnancy (GENIFERH 1 RhD typing group), and the second will be a conventional management, i.e. without RHD fetal typing (GENIFERH 1 control group). The two groups will consist of 13 maternity wards spread over French territory. The second study (GENIFERH 2) is an evaluation of RhD fetal typing diagnostic performance and biological feasibility in routine antenatal practice with development of knew technical support; it will be based on more than 3500 fetal genotypings performed during one year by the five laboratories participating at the two studies.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2532

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Hopital Saint Antoine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult Rh negative pregnant women followed in the participating centers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult Rh negative pregnant patients ( ≥ 18 years)
  • Valid and confirmed result of Rh D negative status.(one copy saved into the obstetrical records)
  • Absence of actively produced anti-D antibody as shown on laboratory examination of a blood sample taken within the first trimester of pregnancy.
  • Evolving pregnancy at the time of inclusion in the study ( between 8 and 26 gestation weeks as confirmed by early sonography).
  • Absence of a previous invasive fetal RHD genotyping ( chorionic villous sampling, amniocentesis).
  • Patient having signed an informed consent for the study.
  • Inclusion and delivery expected in the same maternity ward
  • Patient affiliated to a social security regimen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evolving pregnancy seen for the first time after 26 gestation weeks.
  • Poor understanding of the objectives of the study ( language barrier, ...)
  • Delivery expected in a maternity ward not participating at the study.
  • Fetal RHD invasive genotyping performed during early pregnancy on amniotic fluid or chorionic villus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
1
Adult Rh negative pregnant patients from 7 selected centers (SAINT ANTOINE hospital, CHU Marseille, CHU Nantes, CHU Lille, LOUIS MOURIER Hospital, SAINT VINCENT-PAUL Hospital, CH POISSY)
Genetic: Genotyping
Whole blood sample
2
Adult Rh negative pregnant patients from 6 selected centers (Tenon hospital, Jean VERDIER Hospital, La Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Cochin Hospital, Robert Debre Hospital, BICHAT Hospital)
Other: Usual prophylaxis
Prophylactic anti-RhD
Other Names:
  • Prophylactic anti-RhD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
cost-effectiveness of the two strategies of antenatal management by comparing the rate of RhD negative women eligible for receiving RHIG that would have not receive prophylactic anti-RhD in the two populations, the one with fetal RHD typing and the other
Time Frame: At the end of the study
At the end of the study

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of the applicability of non invasive fetal RHD typing in the antenatal management of unimmunized Rh-negative pregnant patients in different settings.
Time Frame: At the end of the study
At the end of the study
performance assessment of high throughput fetal RHD genotyping in hospital laboratories.
Time Frame: At the end of the study
At the end of the study
Evaluation of the technical support needed to realize high throughput fetal RHD genotyping by authorized laboratories.
Time Frame: At the end of the study
At the end of the study
Development and diffusion of external quality controls for non invasive fetal RHD genotyping.
Time Frame: At the end of the study
At the end of the study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yves BROSSARD, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 13, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 28, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 30, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 26, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P 060410
  • IC 0606

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings