NIS to Observe Improvement in Global Assessment of Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia

October 13, 2011 updated by: AstraZeneca

Non-interventional Clinical Study to Observe Improvement in Global Assessment of Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia, Treated With Atypical Antipsychotics

The purpose of the study is to monitor the general functional changes among patients with schizophrenia, treated with atypical antipsychotics dosed once daily for a period of 6 months.The primary study objective is to compare general functioning of patients with schizophrenia treated with Seroquel SR between baseline and the last study visit. The secondary study objectives are to compare general functioning of patients with schizophrenia treated with other atypical antipsychotic medicinal products administered once daily between baseline and the last study visit, monitoring of other indicators of clinical improvement, evaluation of patient compliance and assessment of occurrence of adverse effects

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
106

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Slovenia
      • Begunje, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Brezice, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Brezovica pri Ljubljani, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Idrija, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Koper, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Ljubljana, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Maribor, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Nova Gorica, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Novo Mesto, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Ormoz, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Postojna, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Radenci, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Sezana, Slovenia
        • Research Site
      • Vojnik, Slovenia
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients visiting psychiatrist's practice

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients have a diagnosis of schizophrenia, as defined by DSM-IV-TR
  • patients' symptoms are controlled with Seroquel SR started up to 1 month before the inclusion
  • or patients' symptoms are controlled with other atypical antipsychotic in once daily formulation started up to 1 month before the inclusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who are treated with Seroquel SR or other antipsychotic more than 1 month
  • patients with prescribed antipsychotic combinations
  • pregnant women or women who are breast-feeding
  • patients who have been treated with antipsychotics in depot formulations for the last two months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
1
Seroquel SR: Patients whose symptoms are controlled with Seroquel SR and started with the therapy up to 1 month before the inclusion
2
Atypical antipsychotics: Patients whose symptoms are controlled with atypical antipsychotic in once daily formulation (excluding Seroquel SR) and started with the therapy up to 1 month before the inclusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To compare improvement in global assessment of functioning (using the GAF scale) between the baseline and the final study visit in the Seroquel SR-treated group.
Time Frame: three times: 0, 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion
three times: 0, 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To assess improvement in global assessment of functioning (using the GAF scale) between the baseline and the final study visit in the group of patients treated with other atypical antipsychotics
Time Frame: three times: 0, 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion
three times: 0, 12 and 24 weeks after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Pregelj, MD, PhD, Psihiatricna klinika Ljubljana, Studenec 48, 1260 Ljubljana

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 29, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 2, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 14, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NIS-NSI-SER-2008/1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings