Neuragen for Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy

March 10, 2015 updated by: Kieran Cooley, The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine

The Safety and Efficacy of Neuragen in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Double-blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of Neuragen (a natural health product oil rubbed into the skin) is effective at reducing pain and improving the quality of life in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Incidence of diabetic neuropathy and development of diabetic ulcers varies based on the severity (lack of blood sugar control) and duration of diabetes. Estimates of rates of occurrence vary although one prospective study showed 7.2% of newly diagnosed ulcer-free diabetics developed ulcers within one year of being diagnosed. Current treatment initiatives aimed at educating diabetic patients on how to prevent diabetic ulcers and mange peripheral neuropathy have had varied success. Chronic pain is the number one reason that this population seeks help from medical professionals. Diabetics are particularly predisposed to a potentially disabling form of chronic pain known as peripheral neuropathy. In fact, over 50% of diabetics have painful neuropathy, or will develop this condition. Other than the primary goal of addressing blood sugar levels, conventional treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy involves prescription gabapentanoids or opiod analgesics, both of which have considerable cost and may be associated with side effects from long-term use and overall limited success rates. Neuragen is an over-the-counter natural health product that may be a safe and effective treatment option for this disease. Using a randomized double-blind placebo control clinical trial the effects of Neuragen on pain, function and quality of life will be assessed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H1V7
        • Pain Management Unit
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M2K 1E2
        • Robert Schad Naturopathic Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women of at least 18 years of age
  • Established diagnosis of neuropathic pain for at least the past 3 months duration, and type 1 or type 2 diabetes, confirmed by primary care physician and/or neurologist. By signing the informed consent, participants agree to have the study coordinator contact their physician for confirmation of diagnosis.
  • Pain of at least level 4 on a 0-10 scale, and not over 9, despite other treatments on intake.
  • Presence of dynamic tactile allodynia or pinprick hyperalgesia
  • Normal cognitive and communication skills (as judged by investigator) and ability to complete self-report questionnaires.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Previous or continuing use of Neuragen®
  • Evidence of other types of pain as, or more severe, than the pain under study
  • Major psychological conditions requiring treatment
  • History of eczema/atopy/anaphylaxis or unusual skin reactions. This will be assessed using a subjective question (Have you ever suffered from eczema? Or experienced a skin reaction to a substance? Or experienced an anaphylactic reaction?)
  • Self reported sensitivity to perfumes, essential oils, odors.
  • Changes to current pain management regime within the previous month prior to start of study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Neuragen
Ad lib use of Neuragen (a natural health product) applied topically 2-3 times per day in 2-3 drops per application
Other: Neuragen
2-3 drops applied topically 2-3 times per day as needed over a 3 month period
Sham Comparator: Mineral oil
Mineral oil, scent and color matched to intervention
Other: Mineral oil
Ad lib use of mineral (scent and color matched to Neuragen) applied topically 2-3 times per day in 2-3 drops per application

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Brief Pain Inventory for sustained relief
Time Frame: Baseline to month 3
Baseline to month 3
Numeric pain scale (0-10) for immediate relief
Time Frame: Baseline compared to average daily measure over 3 months
Baseline compared to average daily measure over 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
NeuroQol-97 quality of life measurement questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Baseline to 3 months
Liver enzyme - AST
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Baseline to 3 months
Liver enzyme - ALT
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Baseline to 3 months
Liver enzyme - GGT
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Baseline to 3 months
Neurologic impairment scale LL +7
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Baseline to 3 months
Amount of medication used
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Baseline to 3 months
Adverse event reports
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Baseline to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Mary Lynch, MD, Dalhousie University
  • Principal Investigator: Kieran Cooley, ND, The Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 13, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 13, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 16, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 17, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 10, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CCNM-0901

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings