Daily Wear Corneal Infiltrative Event Study (DWCIE)

January 27, 2014 updated by: Loretta Szczotka-Flynn, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Infiltrative Events During Silicone Hydrogel Daily Contact Lens (Daily Wear Corneal Infiltrative Event (DWCIE) Study)

This DWCIE Study is a prospective cohort study of patients fit to the FDA approved and marketed lotrafilcon A (Ciba Vision, Air Optix Night & Day Aqua) soft contact lenses for daily wear (DW) with monthly disposal. 218 healthy myopic (nearsighted) or hyperopic (farsighted) patients with minimal or no astigmatism and no contraindications to DW lens use will be followed for 1 year. The primary outcome is the risk of development of a corneal inflammatory event (CIE) as defined by slit lamp findings and patient symptoms. The main exposure of interest is microbial contamination of study lenses.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
218

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Department of Ophthalmology University Hospitals Case Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient must be at least 15 years old.
  2. The patient must be free of any anterior segment disorders.
  3. The patient must have a spectacle corrected spherical refractive error between +5.50 D and -11.00 D with less than or equal to 1.00 D refractive cylinder.
  4. The patient must be correctable to 20/25 or better with spectacles.
  5. Flat and steep corneal curvatures from Simulated Keratometry readings must be between 39.00 and 48.00 D.
  6. Can be successfully fit with lotrafilcon A lenses at the enrollment visit.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. The patient has worn rigid gas permeable lenses within the last 30 days or polymethylmethacrylate lenses within the last 3 months.
  2. The patient must not be a current successful daily wear user of lotrafilcon A lenses. They may have tried lotrafilcon A lenses in the past, but must not have successfully worn these lenses for daily wear within the last 12 months.
  3. The patient has an autoimmune disease (except for Hashimoto's Thyroiditis), immunocompromising disease, connective tissue disease, atopic dermatitis, insulin dependent diabetes, or any other systemic disease that in the investigator's opinion will affect ocular health.
  4. The patient is taking chronic systemic medications such as corticosteroids, antimetabolites, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents or any other medication that in the investigator's opinion will affect ocular physiology or study participation.
  5. The patient has any ocular disease or condition such as aphakia, corneal dystrophies, corneal edema, external ocular infection, iritis, or had any anterior segment surgery.
  6. The patient is taking any ocular medications. If a patient was previously taking any ocular medications, the medications must have been discontinued at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment.
  7. The patient must have less than or equal to grade 2 on any of the slit lamp observations of: upper tarsal papilla, corneal staining, corneal neovascularization, conjunctival injection, and lid erythema or scales. Slit lamp findings higher than grade 2 bias the patient toward an adverse event and it may be difficult to detect true change related to contact lens use.
  8. The patient is pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: ReNu Multiplus and lotrafilcon A lenses
ReNu Multiplus contact lens care solution
Device: lotrafilcon A contact lenses
FDA approved soft contact lenses
Other Names:
  • Air Optix Night & Day Aqua contact lenses
Device: Renu Multiplus
Active Comparator: Clear Care solution and lotrafilcon A lenses
Clear Care Contact Lens Care Solution
Device: lotrafilcon A contact lenses
FDA approved soft contact lenses
Other Names:
  • Air Optix Night & Day Aqua contact lenses
Device: Clear Care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Developing a Corneal Inflammatory Event (CIE)
Time Frame: up to 1 year
Raw number of participants in each solution arm developing CIE over 12 month follow-up period
up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With CIE Stratified by Microbial Bioburden on Lenses
Time Frame: up to 1 year
Microbial bioburden on lenses was determined with predetermined cutoffs to identify substantial bioburden as high levels of normal flora or presence of pathogenic abnormal flora on lenses
up to 1 year
Number of Participants With CIE Based Stratified by Presence or Absence of Corneal Staining Induced by Solution Use.
Time Frame: up to 1 year
Presumed solution induced corneal staining was defined as diffuse punctate fluorescein staining of at least 15% surface area in at least 4 of 5 zones
up to 1 year
Number of Participants With CIE Stratified by Microbial Bioburden on Lens Cases
Time Frame: up to 1 year
Microbial bioburden within lens storage cases was determined with predetermined cutoffs to identify substantial bioburden as high levels of normal flora or presence of pathogenic abnormal flora
up to 1 year
Number of Participants With CIE Stratified by Overall Microbial Bioburden on Lid Margins
Time Frame: up to 1 year
Microbial bioburden on lid margins was determined with predetermined cutoffs to identify substantial bioburden as high levels of normal flora or presence of pathogenic abnormal flora on lids
up to 1 year
Number of Participants With CIE Stratified by CNS Microbial Bioburden on Lid Margins
Time Frame: up to 1 year
Microbial bioburden with coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) on lid margins was determined with predetermined cutoffs to identify substantial bioburden as high levels of normal CNS flora on lids
up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Alcon Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Loretta Szczotka-Flynn, OD, PhD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 9, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 9, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 10, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 10, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 27, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 001 (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings