Study of Lenvatinib (E7080) in Participants With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

August 27, 2018 updated by: Eisai Co., Ltd.

Phase I/II Study of E7080 in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

The purpose of this study is to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy, safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and anti-tumor effect of E7080 when is administered continually once daily in participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
    • Chiba
      • Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, Japan
    • Fukuoka
      • Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
    • Hokkaido
      • Sapporo-shi, Hokkaido, Japan
    • Kanagawa
      • Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, Japan
    • Osaka
      • Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan
      • Osakasayama-shi, Osaka, Japan
    • Saga
      • Saga-shi, Saga, Japan
    • Tokyo
      • Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan
      • Musashino-shi, Tokyo, Japan
  • Korea, Republic of
    • Seoul
      • Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Songpa-gu, Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Histologically or clinically confirmed diagnosis of advanced HCC.
  2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status (ECOG-PS): 0-1.
  3. Adequate laboratory values/organ function tests.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Simultaneous or metachronous cancers.
  2. Pericardial, ascites, or pleural effusion requiring drainage.
  3. Brain metastasis/meningeal carcinomatosis presenting clinical symptoms or requiring treatment.
  4. Malabsorption syndrome.
  5. Artery-portal vein shunt or artery-vein shunt preventing proper diagnosis of tumor.
  6. Use of drugs known to inhibit cytochrome P3A4.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Lenvatinib
Drug: Lenvatinib
In the Dose-Escalation Component of the study, lenvatinib will be administered as continuous once-daily oral dosing. Dose-escalation will occur based on safety information obtained during Cycle 1. The recommended dose for the Expansion Component of the study will use the MTD in Cycle 1.
Other Names:
  • E7080

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Lenvatinib
Time Frame: Up to 28 days (Cycle1)
The MTD was defined as the highest dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 participants had a dose limiting toxicities (DLT). DLT was defined as any of the following events: grade 4 or higher hematologic toxicity or grade 3 thrombocytopenia that required blood transfusion, grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity, grade 4 hypertension uncontrolled by antihypertensive drug(s), aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) greater than (>) 10.0*upper limit of normal (ULN), proteinuria 4+ by urine dipstick, proteinuria 3+ by urine dipstick was to be monitored by 24-hour urine collection, proteinuria >3.5 gram (g) for 24 hours, diarrhea/vomiting/nausea of grade 3 or higher that was uncontrollable despite maximal supportive therapies and abnormal clinical laboratory values that required no treatment, grade 3 proteinuria by dipstick, diarrhea/vomiting/nausea that was managed with supportive therapies were not considered as DLT.
Up to 28 days (Cycle1)
Phase 2: Time to Progression (TTP) by Independent Review Assessment
Time Frame: From day of registration to the day when PD was first confirmed (approximately up to 6.1 years)
TTP was defined as the time from the date of registration to the date when progressive disease (PD) was first confirmed. PD was evaluated according to modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) by an independent imaging review. PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of long diameter (LD) of target lesions as compared with the smallest sum of LD and the increase of LD was at least 5 millimeter (mm) (including new lesions).
From day of registration to the day when PD was first confirmed (approximately up to 6.1 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase 1: Best Overall Response (BOR) of Lenvatinib by Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks (approximately up to 18.4 months)
BOR was performed using RECIST1.1 and was measured as complete response (CR) defined as when an overall response of CR was obtained 2 or more consecutive times at intervals of at least 28 days (the date when the second overall response of CR was confirmed and the BOR established as CR was regarded as the "CR confirmed date), partial response (PR) defined as when the overall response of PR or better (CR or PR) was obtained 2 or more consecutive times at intervals of at least 28 days (the date when the second overall response of PR was confirmed and the BOR established as PR will be regarded as the "PR confirmed date), PD defined as when the BOR was neither CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), and the overall response was PD, SD defined as when the BOR obtained was neither CR nor PR, but no PD from the initial administration to the end of Cycle 2 and the overall response of SD or better occurred at least once and not evaluable (NE) was when the overall response was NE in all cases.
Every 8 weeks (approximately up to 18.4 months)
Phase 1: Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: From day of registration to the day when PD was first confirmed or death (approximately 6.1 years)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a tumor response measured by RECIST 1.1 of CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions (a short diameter is less than (<)10 mm if it exists in a lymph node) plus PR defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the long diameter LD (hereafter referred to as sum of LD) of all target lesions, as compared with Baseline summed LD.
From day of registration to the day when PD was first confirmed or death (approximately 6.1 years)
Phase 1: Disease Control Rate (DCR) by Investigator Assessment
Time Frame: Up to Week 16
DCR was measured by RECIST 1.1 and defined as CR which was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (a short diameter was <10 mm if it exists in a lymph node) plus PR which was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the long diameter (hereafter referred to as sum of LD) of all target lesions, as compared with baseline summed LD plus SD which was reduction in tumor volume of less than 50% or an increase in the volume of 1 or more measurable lesions of less than 25% without the appearance of any new lesions which was neither tumor shrinkage corresponding to PR nor tumor expansion corresponding to PD.
Up to Week 16
Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Assessment
Time Frame: From day of registration to the day when PD was first confirmed or death (approximately 6.1 years)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of registration until the date when PD was first confirmed or death (whichever occurred first) as determined by mRECIST and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of long diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters of target lesions.
From day of registration to the day when PD was first confirmed or death (approximately 6.1 years)
Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR) by Independent Review Assessment
Time Frame: From day of registration to the day when PD was first confirmed or death (approximately 6.1 years)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a tumor response measured by mRECIST of CR defined as disappearance of all target lesions (a short diameter is <10 mm if it exists in a lymph node) plus PR defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the long diameter LD (hereafter referred to as sum of LD) of all target lesions, as compared with Baseline summed LD.
From day of registration to the day when PD was first confirmed or death (approximately 6.1 years)
Phase 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) by Independent Review Assessment
Time Frame: Weeks 8 and 16
DCR was measured by mRECIST and defined as CR which was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (a short diameter is <10 mm if it exists in a lymph node) plus PR which was defined as at least 30% decrease in the sum of the long diameter (hereafter referred to as sum of LD) of all target lesions, as compared with baseline summed LD plus SD which was reduction in tumor volume of less than 50% or an increase in the volume of 1 or more measurable lesions of less than 25% without the appearance of any new lesions which was neither tumor shrinkage corresponding to PR nor tumor expansion corresponding to PD.
Weeks 8 and 16
Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From day of registration to the day of death (approximately 6.1 years)
OS was defined as the time from the date of registration until the date of death.
From day of registration to the day of death (approximately 6.1 years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Eisai Co., Ltd.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 24, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 15, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 13, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 23, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 23, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 24, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • E7080-J081-202

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Lenvatinib

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings