Comparison Between Main Branch and Side Branch Vessels
Comparison of Clinical, Electrical and Physiologic Significance Between Main Branch and Side Branch Vessels
The purpose of this trial is
- to compare the clinical significance of the main vessel and the side branch vessel using EKG, pain score and coronary wedge pressure
- to develop a new scoring system to predict the clinical significance of a side branch
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
- Clinical significance EKG change, pain score during 1 min balloon occlusion
- Different characteristics between ST segment elevation vs non-elevation side branches
- Comparison of coronary wedge pressure
- Establishing a new scoring system to predict the ST elevation during 1min balloon occlusion
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
- Seoul National University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18
- Able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits of receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for true bifurcation lesions, and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure
- Significant stenosis at bifurcation lesion (>50% by visual estimate) which always includes stenosis of side branch (true bifurcation)
- Target main branch lesion(s) located in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 4.5 mm. Target side branch lesion(s) in a native coronary artery with diameter of ≥ 2.25 mm
- Target lesion(s) amenable for PCI with final kissing balloon angioplasty for the side branch
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment)
- Patients refuse to give informed consent
- Patients with left main coronary artery stenosis
- Patients with total occlusion of the bifurcation lesion
- Patients with infarct-related artery at the lesion of interest
- Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction<40%
- Patients with primary cardiomyopathy
- Patients with chronic kidney disease defined as serum Cr>2.0
- Patients who have severe side effects or contraindication to adenosine
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Main vessel, side branch vessel
|
Measuring collateral flow using pressure and/or velocity coronary wire
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
ST elevation during 1min balloon occlusion
Time Frame: Day 1 after PCI
|
Day 1 after PCI
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain score during 1min balloon occlusion
Time Frame: Day 1 after PCI
|
Day 1 after PCI
|
|
|
coronary wedge pressure
Time Frame: during the procedure
|
during the procedure
|
|
|
Usefulness of new scoring system
Time Frame: During the procedure
|
New scoring system includes the vessel size, myocardial territory and relationship with neighboring branches
|
During the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Kim HS, Sohn DW, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB, Choi YS, Tahk SJ. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 16;46(4):633-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.054.
- Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993 Apr;87(4):1354-67. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.4.1354.
- Pijls NH, Bech GJ, el Gamal MI, Bonnier HJ, De Bruyne B, Van Gelder B, Michels HR, Koolen JJ. Quantification of recruitable coronary collateral blood flow in conscious humans and its potential to predict future ischemic events. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jun;25(7):1522-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00111-g.
- Billinger M, Kloos P, Eberli FR, Windecker S, Meier B, Seiler C. Physiologically assessed coronary collateral flow and adverse cardiac ischemic events: a follow-up study in 403 patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov 6;40(9):1545-50. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02378-1.
- Koo BK, Lee SP, Lee JH, Park KW, Suh JW, Cho YS, Chung WY, Doh JH, Nam CW, Yu CW, Lee BK, Vassilev D, Gil R, Lim HS, Tahk SJ, Kim HS. Assessment of clinical, electrocardiographic, and physiological relevance of diagonal branch in left anterior descending coronary artery bifurcation lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov;5(11):1126-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.05.018.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- H-0910-003-062
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.