Educating Missouri Patients About Preemptive Living Donor Transplantation

September 13, 2011 updated by: Amy Waterman, PhD, Washington University School of Medicine

Educating Missouri Patients About Preemptive Living Donor Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study is a group-randomized controlled trial to explore whether improved community transplant education for renal patients not yet on dialysis could increase patients' willingness to pursue preemptive living donor transplant (PLDT) and PLDT rates.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Preemptive living donor transplant (PLDT), where renal patients get a living donor transplant before their kidneys fail, has better graft survival and lower mortality rates than living donor transplant following dialysis. However, not all renal patients and their living donors know about or consider living donation before a patient starts dialysis; To date, patients and donors presenting for PLDT are more likely to be Caucasian, of higher socioeconomic status, and more knowledgeable about transplant. To reach all patients newly diagnosed with kidney disease, the Missouri Kidney Program conducts a community Patient Education Program (PEP) outlining patients' transplant and dialysis options. Since 1994, approximately 2000 Missouri patients newly diagnosed with kidney disease and their family members have attended 2-day PEP classes. However, the current PEP transplant module does not significantly increase patients' willingness to pursue PLDT. Through a previous HRSA grant, Dr. Waterman designed the "Explore Transplant" education program based on Prochaska's Transtheoretical Model of Behavioral Change and her previous research to address key gaps in patients' living donation knowledge and to motivate patients to consider living donation. If funded, this study would conduct a group-randomized controlled trial to explore whether improved community transplant education for renal patients not yet on dialysis could increase patients' willingness to pursue PLDT and PLDT rates. Secondary objectives of the study are: (2) to increase rural and minority patients' access to transplant education, and (3) to describe racial, social, economic, and other influences affecting patients' PLDT willingness. The study design is a group-randomized controlled trial of 300 patients in 30 PEP classes in St. Louis, Springfield, and Kansas City, MO; patients and their family members in 15 classes will be randomized to receive the "Explore Transplant" education module, while 15 control classes will receive the traditional PEP transplant education. Across the education and control PEP classes we will compare: (1) increased willingness to pursue PLDT using baseline and follow-up attitudinal patient surveys, and (2) rates of living donation by tracking whether patients and their living donors present to any Missouri transplant center. At the conclusion of the study, we will have learned important information about how to reach and educate patients who have not yet begun dialysis and have developed a PLDT program that could be utilized in physicians' offices and by other organizations serving renal patients to increase living donation rates.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
370

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Kansas
      • Overland Park, Kansas, United States, 66212
        • Missouri Kidney Program
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63122
        • Missouri Kidney Program
      • Springfield, Missouri, United States, 65807
        • Missouri Kidney Program
      • Warrensburg, Missouri, United States, 64093
        • Missouri Kidney Program

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Attend all 6 education modules
  • 18+ years of age
  • Have given consent by signing informed consent
  • Speak and understand English
  • Can read and understand questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not speak and understand English (material is presented orally)
  • Patients who cannot read and understand the questionnaires
  • Patients who are 17 years of age or younger

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Standard transplant education
Missouri Kidney Program's standard Patient Education Program (PEP) transplant module.
Experimental: Transplant education with video
Explore Transplant transplant module featuring video
Behavioral: Transplant education with video
1 hour standard transplant module is replaced with the Explore Transplant presentation and 20 minute video featuring transplant patients and donors
Experimental: Transplant education with speakers
Explore Transplant transplant module featuring live guest speakers.
Behavioral: Transplant education with speakers
1 hour standard transplant module is replaced with the Explore Transplant presentation and 3 live speakers: 1 deceased donor recipient, 1 living donor recipient and 1 living donor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Willingness to pursue preemptive living donor transplant
Time Frame: pre and post-class
pre and post-class

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Preemptive living donor transplant rates
Time Frame: 1-2 years
1-2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Washington University School of Medicine

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Missouri Kidney Program

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Amy D Waterman, PhD, Washington University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 20, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 13, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 15, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 13, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 080726

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings