Epidemiological Study to Describe Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Clinical Management Patterns in Central Eastern Europe and Russia (Lung-EPICLIN) (EPICLIN)

May 18, 2015 updated by: AstraZeneca

Epidemiological Study to Describe NSCLC Clinical Management Patterns in Central Eastern Europe and Russia. Lung-EPICLIN

The overall aim of the study is:

To provide accurate and reliable information regarding NSCLC clinical management across Central Eastern European countries and Russia in order to detect unmet medical needs of this disease in terms of:

  • Patient and hospital characteristics.
  • Diagnostic and treatment approaches: initial and subsequent.
  • Follow-up patterns in clinical management.
  • Outcomes: symptoms, death, functionality, quality of life.
  • Use of resources and burden on patients and health care systems. Addendum objective is to collect epidemiological data on EGFR mutation status (M+, M-) in the Russian population

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
840

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Belgorod, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Blagoveschensk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Chita, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Engels, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Irkutsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Khimki, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Obninsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Omsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Orel, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Perm, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Pyatigorsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Samara, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Tomsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Tula, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Volgograd, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Yuzno-Sakhalinsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Zhukovsky, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • Altaiskiy Krai
      • Barnaul, Altaiskiy Krai, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • EAO
      • Birobidzhan, EAO, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • Khabarovskiy Krai
      • Khabarovsk, Khabarovskiy Krai, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • Khanty-Mansyiskyi AO
      • Khanty-Mansyisk, Khanty-Mansyiskyi AO, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • Krasnodarskiy Krai
      • Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy Krai, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • Primorskiy Krai
      • Vladivostok, Primorskiy Krai, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • Republic of Sakha
      • Yakutsk, Republic of Sakha, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
    • Resp. of Tatarstan
      • Kazan, Resp. of Tatarstan, Russian Federation
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cancer patients from Oncological Dispensaries and Cancer Research Institutes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed NSCLC diagnosis (e.g.bronchoscopic biopsy or FNAB), all stages, men and women, attending the responsible department of treating this type of patients for the first time between January 1st, 2010 and March 31st, 2010
  • For Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) sub-sample: ability to read and write since they will be asked to participate in the PRO part of the study. Selection will not be based on the disease stage of each patient, in order to avoid a selection bias.
  • Tumour tissue samples (in paraffin-embedded blocks) suitable for EGFR mutation testing available.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mixed histology of small cell and non-small cell lung cancer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
1
Non-small cell lung cancer patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To assess the differences in patient characteristics, disease stage (differentiating between non-advanced disease, locally advanced disease, metastatic disease), and in clinical management across Central Eastern European countries and Russia
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To detect differences in clinical outcomes and related factors among countries
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
To identify factors associated with clinical outcomes (patient, disease stage -see above- and clinical management related factors): predictive modelling for improved patient outcome
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
To identify factors associated with the different levels of functional status and quality of life
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
To compare the use of health care resources among countries
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 17, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 19, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NIS-ORU-IRE-2009/1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings