REASSURE AV Registry (REASSURE)

July 5, 2017 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

Clinical Research Evaluation of the ASSURE Device Atrial and Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Therapies Registry

Long term follow-up to monitor safety for patients implanted with a B301 ASSURE device.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The Guidant ASSURE device is a fully featured pacemaker with additional atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia therapy features. The REASSURE AV study is a clinical evaluation to support approval of these features. This clinical study is intended to provide adequate performance data on two atrial tachyarrhythmia management features, namely the ATS and atrial ATP. In addition data will be collected to verify that the ventricular tachyarrhythmia rescue shock feature performs as intended in the clinical setting in combination with other pacemaker functions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
211

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alaska
      • Anchorage, Alaska, United States
        • Alaska Heart Institute
    • California
      • Larkspur, California, United States
        • Northern California Heart Care
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States
        • Orlando Regional Hospital
      • Saint Petersburg, Florida, United States
        • Heart and Vascular Institute
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
        • Piedmont Hospital
      • Savannah, Georgia, United States
        • St. Joseph Hospital
    • Illinois
      • Downers Grove, Illinois, United States
        • Good Samaritan Hospital
      • Merrionette Park, Illinois, United States
        • Heart Care Research Foundation
    • Indiana
      • Hobart, Indiana, United States
        • St. Mary Medical Center
    • Iowa
      • Des Moines, Iowa, United States
        • Mercy Hospital Medical Center
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States
        • Central Baptist Hospital
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
        • Louisville Cardiology Medical Group
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
        • Medical Center Cardiologist Research
      • Owensboro, Kentucky, United States
        • Owensboro Mercy Health System
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
        • Ochsner Foundation Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States
        • Boston Medical Center
      • Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
        • Lahey Clinic Medical Center
      • Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
        • Baystate Medical Center
      • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
        • University of Massachusetts
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States
        • Henry Ford Hospital
    • Minnesota
      • Duluth, Minnesota, United States
        • Saint Mary's Duluth Clinic
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
        • St. Anthony's Medical Center
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
        • Sunrise Hospital & Medical Center
    • New Jersey
      • Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States
        • Deborah Heart and Lung Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
        • Mount Sinai Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
        • Christ Hospital - Cincinnati
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
        • The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
        • Ohio State University Medical Center
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
        • Hillcrest Medical Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Abington, Pennsylvania, United States
        • Abington Memorial Hospital
      • West Reading, Pennsylvania, United States
        • Reading Hospital and Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
        • Baylor University Medical Center
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • Center for Cardiac Arrhythmias
    • Virginia
      • Fairfax, Virginia, United States
        • Inova Fairfax Hospital
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States
        • Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States
        • Chippenham Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient is willing and capable of providing informed consent at an approved clinical investigational center, and able to attend the investigational center as required by the protocol
  • Patient is implanted with an investigational B301 device as part of the REASSURE AV study

Exclusion Criteria:

* None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: AV Therapy Assessment group
appropriate system performance of the atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia therapies in the ASSURE device
Device: AV Therapy Assessment-B301 investigational device
Atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia therapy delivered by the B301 investigational device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inappropriate Shock Free Rate
Time Frame: Three months post-implant
Incidences of ventricular shock therapy up to three months post implant. Rescue shocks are intended for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias detected in the ventricle at rates greater than 220 bpm, including arrhythmias that originate in the atria if they are conducted at rates greater than 220 bpm as this can be life threatening if persistent. Shocks delivered for other reasons will be considered inappropriate shocks.
Three months post-implant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Conversion Success Rate up to Three Months Post-implant
Time Frame: Three months post-implant
For a pacemaker patient who experiences a spontaneous high rate ventricular arrhythmia, the ASSURE device may provide rescue shocks, a faster and more effective response than external methods of rescue. Successful conversion of an episode is defined by conversion to either; sinus rhythm, sinus tachycardia or atrial pacing by one minute post therapy delivery.
Three months post-implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Scientific Corporation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 5, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • G040067

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings