Vertos Mild - Post Market Patient Outcomes
Single - Center, Prospective, Patient Outcomes Assessment of Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression With the Mild Devices in Patients With Symptomatic Central Canal Stenosis.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
West Virginia
-
Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25301
- The Center for Pain Relief, Inc
-
Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25301
- The Center for Pain Relief, Inc.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic and lumbar spinal stenosis caused by dorsal element hypertrophy
- Prior failure of conservative therapy and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) >20%
- Radiologic evidence of lumbar spinal stenosis, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy (typically >2.5mm),confirmed by pre-op MRI/CT report
- Central canal cross sectional area clearly reduced per MRI/CT report
- If present, anterior listhesis < or = to 5.0mm (preferred) and deemed stable by the Investigator
- Able to walk at least 10 feet unaided before being limited by pain
- Available to complete 26 weeks of follow up
- A signed Consent Form is obtained from the patient
- Adults 18 years of age or older
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior surgery at the intended treatment level
- Compound fracture with intraspinal retropulsion contributing to spinal stenosis
- Disabling back or leg pain from causes other than lumbar spinal stenosis
- Disc protrusion or osteophyte formation severe enough to confound study outcome
- Facet hypertrophy severe enough to confound study outcome
- Bleeding disorders and/or current use of anti-coagulants
- Use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) within 5 days of treatment
- Epidural steroids with 3 weeks prior to procedure
- Inability of patient to lie prone for any reason with anesthesia support
- Metabolic wound healing pathologies that may be deemed by the Investigator to compromise the study outcomes
- Dementia and/or inability to give informed consent
- Pregnant and/or breastfeeding
- On workman's Compensation or considering litigation associated with back pain
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Minimally invasive lumbar decompression
|
This minimally invasive procedure is performed under fluoroscopic image guidance through a dorsal approach to the spine.
The patient is given local anesthesia and a sedative but needs to be responsive to the surgeon's questions for neurological monitoring.
Under image guidance, the mild tools are inserted and positioned on the posterior spinal lamina, to the left or right of the spinous process.
The tools are used to cut and remove tissue and bone from the posterior side of the lumbar spine to create a space inside the spine that can help decompress some of the spinal nerves.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain as Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Time Frame: Baseline and six months
|
A validated ten point scale was used where ten is the worst possible pain and zero represents complete lack of pain.
The change from baseline to six months is presented below, where a positive value represents the baseline value minus the 6 month value.
|
Baseline and six months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Improvement in Functional Mobility
Time Frame: baseline and month 6
|
Measured subjectively by the Oswestry Disability Index.
Extent of disturbance in activities of daily living is subjectively reported using this validated instrument.Higher score indicate greater limitations in activity.
The questionnaire is divided into 10 topics including pain intensity, personal care, lifting walking standing sitting, sleeping social life, traveling, employment/homemaking.
Each topic is rated zero (no pain or no limitation) to 5 (high pain or very limited physically) based on typical pain and/or physical limitations.
The worst possible score is 50 (100% disability) and the best score is zero (0% disability).Change from baseline to month 6 is reported below, where a positive value represents the baseline value minus the month 6 value.
|
baseline and month 6
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured by the Symptom Severity Scale of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ).
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6
|
As a validated patient outcome tool specific to lumbar spinal stenosis, Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) captures symptom severity as a quality of life indicator.
A mean score of 1 is the best possible outcome representing 'no pain' in symptom severity, whereas higher mean scores up to a maximum of 5 indicate worse patient symptoms.
The symptom severity outcomes are presented below as change from baseline to month 6 where a positive value represents the baseline value minus the 6 month value.
Treatment is considered 'successful' or 'clinically relevant' if the patient population has at least a 0.5 improvement in symptom severity.
|
Baseline and month 6
|
|
Quality of Life as Measured by Physical Function Scale of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ).
Time Frame: Baseline and month 6
|
For this ZCQ domain, a mean score of 1 is the best possible outcome representing 'no limitation' in physical function, whereas a mean score of 4 indicates worst physical function.
Zurich Claudication physical function scale from this validated lumbar spine-specific measurement questionnaire are reported below as change from baseline to month 6.
A positive value represents the baseline value minus the 6 month value.
Treatment is considered clinically relevant when at least a 0.5 improvement is achieved.
|
Baseline and month 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Timothy R Deer, MD, Center for Pain Relief, Inc
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- #D1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.