Phase II Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) vs. Globus Pallidus (GPi) Trial

June 27, 2014 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

CSP #468 Phase II - A Comparison of Best Medical Therapy and Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus for the Treatment of Parkinson's Disease, Phase II

The goal of the second phase of the study is to determine if simultaneous bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation or simultaneous bilateral globus pallidus stimulation is more effective in reducing symptoms of Parkinson's Disease.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD) Whether DBS is superior to comprehensive best medical therapy or whether some patients or symptoms respond better to DBS in one area of the brain or the other is currently not known. The goals of this project are to compare the effectiveness of DBS and comprehensive medical therapy as treatments for PD (Phase I) and to compare bilateral DBS at 2 areas of the brain-the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus (GPi) -to determine the most effective brain site for surgical intervention (Phase II) In this prospective, randomized, multi-center trial, 316 patients will be enrolled at 13 centers over four and a half years. Patients will initially be randomized to immediate surgery (DBS) or to 6 months of "best medical therapy". BMT arm patients will then be randomized to proceed into the DBS surgical phase of the trial. The DBS site (STN pr GPi) will be assigned on a random basis at the time the patient enters the surgical phase of the trial. Patients will be followed for two years post surgery (24 months for DBS only patients and 30 months for BMT-DBS patients) Effective 8/5/05 randomization to the BMT arm has been discontinued since the study has sufficient information to compare the outcomes of DBS and BMT patients at 6 months. The findings will be critically important in establishing the optimal surgical treatment of the disabling symptoms of PD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
299

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • University of California at Los Angeles
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • VA Medical Center, San Francisco
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94121
        • University of California at San Francisco
      • West Los Angeles, California, United States, 90073
        • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West LA
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52246-2208
        • VA Medical Center, Iowa City
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201
        • VA Medical Center, Portland
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97207
        • Oregon Health Sciences University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania Hospital
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19106
        • Philadelphia, OPC
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (152)
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249
        • Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249
        • Medical College of Virginia
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98108
        • VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage 2 or worse when off medications
  • L-dopa responsive with clearly defined "on" periods (i.e. symptoms improve at least partially with L-dopa administration, a characteristic that helps distinguish idiopathic PD from "Parkinson's Plus" and atypical Parkinson's syndromes-see below)
  • persistent disabling symptoms (e.g. on troubling dyskinesias, or disabling "off" periods at least 3 hours/day) despite medication therapy. Patients will have been treated with variable doses of levodopa and dopamine agonists (at a minimum) and will have had an adequate trial of other adjunctive medications)
  • stable on medical therapy for at least one month prior to study enrollment
  • age >21
  • available and willing to be followed-up according to study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • "Parkinson's plus" syndromes, secondary, or atypical Parkinson's syndromes (e.g. progressive supranuclear palsy, striato-nigral degeneration, multiple system atrophy, post-stroke, post-traumatic, or post-encephalitic Parkinson's. These patients have cardinal symptoms characteristic of PD but with additional symptoms indicating other organic brain dysfunction, such as gaze palsies, autonomic dysfunction, lack of response to L-dopa, these individuals tend not to improve with standard treatments for PD)
  • previous Parkinson's Disease surgery
  • medical contraindications to surgery or stimulation (e.g. uncontrolled hypertension, advanced coronary artery disease, other implanted stimulation or electronically-controlled devices including cardiac demand pacemaker, aneurysm clips, cochlear implants, or a spinal cord stimulator) (Note: for the subject who receives either a pacemaker and/or defibrillator after this study enrollment, he/she will be allowed to continue the study if the neurostimulator system can be adequately programmed to permit system compatibility)
  • contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging (e.g. indwelling metal fragments or implants that might be affected by MRI)
  • active alcohol or drug abuse
  • score on Mini-Mental Status examination of 24 or lower, or other neuropsychological dysfunction 9e.g. dementia) that would contraindicate surgery
  • intracranial abnormalities that would contraindicate surgery (e.g. stroke, tumor, vascular abnormality affecting the target area)
  • pregnancy
  • concurrent participation in another research protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: STN
Participants were randomized to receive deep brain stimulation on STN (Subthalamic Nucleus) target.
Device: Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation
The DBS site (STN or GPi) was assigned on a random basis at the time the patient enters the surgical phase of the trial.
Active Comparator: GPi
Participants were randomized to receive deep brain stimulation on GPi (Globus Pallidus) target.
Device: Bilateral Deep Brain Stimulation
The DBS site (STN or GPi) was assigned on a random basis at the time the patient enters the surgical phase of the trial.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Change From Baseline in the UPDRS-III Score at 24 Months With Deep-brain Stimulation and Without Medication.
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months
The primary outcome measure for the comparison of GPi deep brain stimulation (DBS) to STN DBS is the motor function score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS Part III) measured while the patient is off medications and on stimulation at follow-up visits post surgery. UPDRS Part III has 14 items assessing motor skills including facial expression and speech, tremors, rigidity, posture, gait, and bradykinesia. Left and right sides (arms, legs, and hands) are assessed separately for seven of the functions. The motor function (UPDRS part III) assessments are done by turning on the stimulation with and without taking PD medications (on/off) at each in-person visit. A summary score ranging from 0 to 108 is generated by adding the 14 specific motor function responses. The higher score indicates the worse motor function.
Baseline and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Change From Baseline in the UPDRS Scores Part I (Mentation) at 24 Months.
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months
The UPDRS has four parts (Parts I-IV) in which a total of 42 disease characteristics are assessed. Most characteristics are assessed according to their severity on a 0-4 scale (0 = normal, 4 = most substantial impairment), and some are assessed only for absence (score = 0) or presence (score = 1). Part I has four items assessing intellectual impairment, thought disorder, depression and motivation. A summary score ranging from 0 to16 is generated by adding the four items. The higher score indicates worse condition.
Baseline and 24 months
The Change From Baseline in the UPDRS Scores Part II (Activity of Daily Living) at 24 Months.
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months
The UPDRS has four parts (Parts I-IV) in which a total of 42 disease characteristics are assessed. Most characteristics are assessed according to their severity on a 0-4 scale (0 = normal, 4 = most substantial impairment), and some are assessed only for absence (score = 0) or presence (score = 1). Part II has 13 items focusing on activities of daily living including walking, writing, dressing and speech. A summary score ranging from 0 to 52 is generated by adding the 13 items. The higher score indicates worse condition.
Baseline and 24 months
The Change From Baseline in the UPDRS Scores Part IV (Complication of Therapy) at 24 Months.
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 months
The UPDRS has four parts (Parts I-IV) in which a total of 42 disease characteristics are assessed. Most characteristics are assessed according to their severity on a 0-4 scale (0 = normal, 4 = most substantial impairment), and some are assessed only for absence (score = 0) or presence (score = 1). Part IV includes four categories (11 items) related to dyskinesias, clinical fluctuations of symptoms, and other complications. A summary score ranging from 0 to 23 is generated by adding the four items. The higher score indicates worse condition.
Baseline and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
US Department of Veterans Affairs

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Medtronic

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Kenneth Follett, VA Medical Center, Iowa City

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 24, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 26, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 14, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 468 Phase II
  • VA-NINDS-01 (Other Identifier: NIH-NINDS)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings