Left Atrial Ablation With Permanent Pacemaker or ImplanTable Loop Recorder Follow-UP (LAAPITUP)

March 29, 2010 updated by: Eastbourne General Hospital

The purpose of this study is 3 fold:-

  1. To compare the efficacy and complication rates of 2 widely used methods, conventional irrigation tip ablation catheter (LASSO) and Ablation Frontiers ablation technology, of AF ablation for PAF.
  2. To evaluate the Reveal XT ILR as a long term accurate AF monitoring device as compared to the 'gold standard' DDD pacemaker Holter.
  3. To accurately evaluate, by continuous rhythm monitoring for 1 year, the efficacy of AF ablation therapy for PAF.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • East Sussex
      • Eastbourne, East Sussex, United Kingdom, BN21 2UD
        • Eastbourne District General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 16-80 years old.
  • Symptomatic PAF with AF episodes self terminating after at least 30 seconds but not longer than 24 hours. Preference is given to patients with AF episodes lasting no longer than 4 hours.
  • PAF should have failed at least one drug therapy medical therapy.
  • Patients must give written informed consent form prior to participating in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is suffering with unstable angina in last 1 week.
  • Patient has had a myocardial infarction within last 2 months.
  • Patient is expecting or has had major cardiac surgery within last 2 months.
  • Patient is participating in a conflicting study.
  • Patient is mentally incapacitated and cannot consent or comply with follow-up.
  • Patient has NYHA class III/ IV heart failure.
  • Patients with severe valvular or ventricular dysfunction.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Patient suffers with other cardiac rhythm disorders.
  • Recent coronary artery intervention or other factors suggesting clinical instability (ECG, clinical or laboratory findings)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Ablation Frontiers Ablation
This group will undergo AF ablation using Ablation Frontiers Technology.
Procedure: AF Ablation with Ablation Frontiers Technology
AF Ablation with Ablation Frontiers Technology - PVAC, TVAC and MASC.
Active Comparator: LASSO ablation
This group will undergo atrial fibrillation ablation with traditional LASSO technology
Procedure: AF Ablation with LASSO catheter
AF Ablation with traditional LASSO catheter
Active Comparator: Reveal XT monitoring
This group will be monitored pre and post ablation using a Reveal XT implantable loop recorder.
Device: Reveal XT
Reveal XT implantable loop recorder monitored group
Active Comparator: Permanent Pacemaker - dual chamber
This group will be monitored pre and post ablation with a dual chamber permanent pacemaker
Device: Permanent Dual Chamber Pacemaker
This group will be monitored with a dual chamber pacemaker with advanced AF monitoring capabilities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AF Burden
Time Frame: 12 Months
AF Burden post left atrial ablation is defined as the sum of the duration of all atrial tachyarrhythmias expressed as a percentage of the total observation period as assessed by PM Holters.
12 Months
AF Burden
Time Frame: 12 months
Comparison of AF burden post PVI ablation using a conventional irrigation tip catheter with LASSO guidance (or equivalent) versus Ablation Frontiers Technology using the PVAC, MASC and TVAC catheters via standard trans-septal techniques.
12 months
AF Burden detected
Time Frame: 12 months
To evaluate the Reveal XT ILR as a long term accurate AF monitoring device as compared to the 'gold standard' DDD pacemaker Holter.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Arrhythmia frequency - symptomatic or asymptomatic.
Time Frame: 12 months
Arrhythmia Frequency is defined as the total number of atrial tachyarrhythmic episodes divided by the observation period, expressed as episodes per day as assessed by PM Holters.
12 months
Time to first episode of AF
Time Frame: 12 months
Time to persistent AF is defined as the time from ablation to the first recorded episode of AF
12 months
Average AF duration
Time Frame: 12 months
Average arrhythmia duration is defined as the total duration of atrial arrhythmia divided by the total number of atrial arrhythmia episodes.
12 months
Time to persistent AF.
Time Frame: 12 months
Time to persistent AF (atrial fibrillation episode lasting for 7 days)
12 months
Average SR duration.
Time Frame: 12 months
Average sinus rhythm duration is defined as the total duration of sinus rhythm from first atrial arrhythmic episode until last atrial arrhythmic episode divided by the number of atrial arrhythmic episodes minus 1.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Eastbourne General Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stephen S Furniss, FRCP, MD, East Sussex NHS Trust
  • Principal Investigator: AN Sulke, FRCP, MD, East Sussex NHS Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 29, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 30, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 30, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 29, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LAAPITUP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings