Hepatic Safety of Raltegravir Versus Efavirenz as HIV Therapy for Patients With HIV and HCV Coinfection

July 21, 2021 updated by: University of Hawaii

Hepatic Safety of Raltegravir-based and Efavirenz-based Antiretroviral Regimens in Antiretroviral-Naïve HIV-infected Subjects Co-Infected With Hepatitis C

The main objective is to evaluate the hepatic safety of raltegravir when compared to efavirenz, both in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine as first-line HIV treatment in patients with HIV and hepatitis C coinfection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The trial will recruit 80 treatment-naive HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C coinfection from two HIV treatment centers in Vietnam. Patients will be randomized to receive either raltegravir or efavirenz, both in combination of tenofovir and emtricitabine, as first-line HIV therapy over a period of 72 weeks. The primary endpoint is the rate of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation during the 72 week study period. Secondary endpoints include rates of virological suppression, CD4 count change, numbers of AIDS events and death, rates of fasting glucose and cholesterol measures, neurocognitive function and levels of immune activation. Patients will be followed monthly for the first 3 months and every 3 months thereafter. At the end of the trial period, patients will be transferred to the National HIV treatment program for continuation of HIV therapy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Vietnam
      • Hai Phong, Vietnam
        • Viet Tiep General Hospital
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
        • Hospital for Tropical Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV infected patients, age >18 years, meet Vietnam guideline to begin ART (CD4 count < 350 cells/mm3 and/or WHO stage III or IV disease)
  • Hepatitis C infection as documented by positive HCV antibodies and a detectable serum HCV RNA level
  • AST and ALT ≤ 2 x ULN (≤ 80 U/L)
  • Estimated creatinine clearance ≥ 60 mL/min

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior ART
  • Positive Hepatitis B surface antigen
  • Clinical evidence of de-compensated cirrhosis (ascites, encephalopathy, esophageal bleeding)
  • Requirement for acute therapy for other AIDS-defining illness within 14 days prior to study entry
  • Currently on rifampicin therapy
  • In the first trimester of pregnancy, intent to become pregnant, or breast feeding during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Raltegravir based therapy
Emtricitabine/tenofovir DF* 200 mg/300 mg po daily + Raltegravir 400 mg twice daily
Drug: Raltegravir
Emtricitabine/tenofovir DF* 200 mg/300 mg po daily + Raltegravir 400 mg twice daily
Other Names:
  • Isentress
Active Comparator: Efavirenz based therapy
Emtricitabine/tenofovir DF* 200 mg/300 mg po daily + Efavirenz 600 mg po daily
Drug: Efavirenz
Emtricitabine/tenofovir DF* 200 mg/300 mg po daily + Efavirenz 600 mg po daily
Other Names:
  • Sustiva

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of Grade 2 and Higher Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Elevations
Time Frame: over week 72
To estimate the rates of grade 2*and higher ALT elevations in the two regimens.
over week 72

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Hawaii

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Vietnam
Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Viet Tiep General Hospital, Hai Phong, Vietnam

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Van Vinh Chau Nguyen, MD, PhD, Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • Principal Investigator: Cecilia M Shikuma, M.D., University of Hawaii - Hawaii Center for AIDS (HICFA)
  • Study Director: Thuy Le, M.D., University of Hawaii, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 16, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 16, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 22, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 21, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VHARP 001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be shared with other researchers upon request following the publication of the data. Researchers will contact the PI.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings