Clinical Effectiveness and Impact on Health-related Quality of Life in Peruvian Patients With Psoriasis After 16 Weeks of Adalimumab Therapy

August 8, 2014 updated by: AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

Observational Study; Clinical Effectiveness and Impact on Health-related Quality of Life in Peruvian Patients With Psoriasis After 16 Weeks of Adalimumab Therapy

Adalimumab has recently been authorized for active psoriasis in Peru and local experience is very low. The aim of this study is to obtain Peruvian data of clinical effectiveness and impact on health-related quality of life with the use of adalimumab in participants with chronic plaque psoriasis complying with the dosing and monitoring recommendations of the local approved label.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Peru
      • Lima, Peru
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 35783
      • Lima, Peru
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 56700
      • Trujillo, Peru
        • Site Reference ID/Investigator# 43147

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with moderate to severe psoriasis who receive adalimumab therapy according to standard clinical practice at Peruvian hospitals/clinics.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis defined as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 10 and body surface area ≥ 10% with or without psoriatic arthritis, who have an adalimumab therapy indication because they are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy and other systemic therapies are medically less appropriate
  • Participant is capable of and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants should not be enrolled if they cannot be treated in accordance with the local product label
  • Participants enrolled into another study or clinical trial
  • History of hepatitis B infection
  • History of neurologic symptoms suggestive of central nervous system demyelinating disease
  • History of cancer or lymphoproliferative disease (other than successfully treated non-melanoma skin cancer or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix)
  • Active tuberculosis infection before initiating adalimumab treatment or latent tuberculosis infection not able to take complete prophylactic treatment
  • Pregnant or lactating female, demonstrated by a pregnancy test before entering the study and willing to use a contraceptive method
  • Use of another anti-tumoral necrosis factor previously
  • History of congestive heart failure
  • Any other condition that according to the criteria of the participating investigator represents an obstacle for study conduction and/or subjects participants to an unacceptable risk
  • Participants with active infection including chronic or localized infections until infections are controlled
  • History of sensitivity to latex
  • Participants who will receive concomitant phototherapy and systemic therapy during adalimumab therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Adalimumab Treatment in Participants with Psoriasis
Participants with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis defined as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 10 and body surface area ≥ 10% with or without psoriatic arthritis, who have an adalimumab therapy indication because they are candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy and other systemic therapies are medically less appropriate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Reaching a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI-75) Response
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). PASI-75 responders are the participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The mean PASI improvement was calculated using a linear regression model.
Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Reaching a Minimal Important Difference (MID) in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 16
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much (score of 3), a lot, a little, or not at all (score of 0). The DLQI score ranges from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. MID for the DLQI was defined as a score decrease from baseline of 2.3 to 5. The mean DLQI improvement was calculated using a linear regression model.
Baseline to Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Index Score at Baseline and Week 16
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 16
EQ-5D is a self-reported health outcome which measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain discomfort, anxiety, and depression. An overall score is derived that measures from -0.59 (worst) to +1 (best). Improvement was defined as a mean score increase of at least 0.2.
Baseline, Week 16
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From the time of informed consent until 70 days (5 half-lives) after the last dose of study drug (treatment was 16 weeks).
An adverse event was considered an SAE if it met any of the following criteria: death of the participant; life-threatening event; hospitalization; prolongation of hospitalization; congenital anomaly; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; an important medical event requiring medical or surgical intervention to prevent serious outcome; spontaneous or elective abortion. SAEs included the occurrence of tuberculosis, opportunistic infection, and malignancy.
From the time of informed consent until 70 days (5 half-lives) after the last dose of study drug (treatment was 16 weeks).
Adherence to Adalimumab Treatment
Time Frame: up to 16 weeks
Adherence was measured by how many times a participant had a discontinuation (i.e., missed a study dose) during the 16 weeks of treatment.
up to 16 weeks
Mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 16
PASI is a composite score based on the degree of effect on body surface area of psoriasis and the extension of erythema (reddening), induration (plaque thickness), desquamation (scaling) of the lesions and area affected as observed on the day of examination. The score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (very severe psoriasis). The mean PASI improvement was calculated using a linear regression model.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 16
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 16
DLQI score is a participant-reported outcome consisting of a set of 10 questions regarding the degree to which the participant's skin has affected certain behaviors and quality of life over the last week. Responses to each are: very much (score of 3), a lot, a little, or not at all (score of 0). The DLQI score ranges from 0 (best) to 30 (worst); the higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. The mean DLQI improvement was calculated using a linear regression model.
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Manuel Uribe, MD, AbbVie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 8, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P12-261

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings