Feasibility and Safety Study Using Preoperative High-Dose Single-Fraction Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy at High-Risk for Extraprostatic Cancer

March 4, 2015 updated by: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Phase I Feasibility and Safety Study Using Preoperative High-Dose Single-Fraction Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy at High-Risk for Extraprostatic Cancer

This study is being done to test the safety of a single high-dose of radiation therapy before radical prostatectomy (removal of the prostate). The investigators want to find out what effects, good and/or bad, the radiation will have on men undergoing prostatectomy. The investigators are especially interested in men who are at risk for having cancer cells that have spread outside the prostate.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Biopsy-proven prostate cancer verified at MSKCC. The biopsy will include a minimum of 10 cores
  • Radical Prostatectomy (RP) chosen as the therapeutic method
  • The size of the prostate will be < 70 cc by transrectal ultrasound or endorectal MRI imaging
  • No radiographic evidence of lymph node metastases, bone metastases or soft tissue disease
  • Risk of extraprostatic cancer of > 40% based on the MSKCC surgical nomogram
  • Age > or = to 18 years
  • KPS > or = to 80
  • Able to tolerate immobilization cradle positioning

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic reaction to intravenous CT contrast (if premedicated, pt will not be excluded)
  • Prior radiation to the planned target region
  • Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy
  • Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy Luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone(LHRH)agonist and/or antiandrogen)
  • Prior transurethral resection of the prostate
  • Normal tissue directly overlying target precluding ability to limit the bowel, bladder, rectum or other tissue to less than or equal to 15-16 Gy dose constraints
  • Dominant prostatic lesion within 3 mm from the anterior rectal wall by imaging studies
  • Creatinine clearance <60 ml/min/1.73m2

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: High-Dose Single-Fraction Image-Guided Radiotherapy
This will assess the feasibility and safety of this approach in men at high-risk for extraprostatic prostate cancer undergoing RP. This initial trial has been designed in a manner intended to emphasize patient comfort and safety.
Radiation: High-Dose Single-Fraction Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
A baseline DCE-MRI will be obtained prior to the day of radiotherapy treatment. Immediately following the delivery of radiotherapy another DCE-MRI will be performed to assess for perfusion changes in the prostate resulting from irradiation. RP will be completed within 6 weeks (+ 2 weeks) of radiation and the RP specimen will be assessed for radiation treatment effect and other pathologic parameters (including surgical margin status) by a dedicated genitourinary pathologist. Following RP, participants will follow-up with their surgeon every 3 months for one year, with visits alternating between the urologist and the radiation oncologist. After the first year follow-up will occur at 6 month intervals until the patient is 3 years out from surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To assess the feasibility and safety of single-fraction image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT).
Time Frame: 1 year
Given prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) in men at high risk for extraprostatic cancer.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To analyze the changes in prostate perfusion induced by single-fraction IG-IMRT.
Time Frame: 1 before radiation simulation, 1 after radiation treatment
via dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI)
1 before radiation simulation, 1 after radiation treatment
To assess the long-term toxicity of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT)
Time Frame: weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after RP
Given prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) with respect to urinary function, erectile function, and bowel function.
weeks 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after RP
To assess the effect of IG-IMRT on the anticipated positive margin rate at the time of RP.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 14, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 14, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 6, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 09-013

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings