Adiana Post-Approval Clinical Study (APACS) (APACS)

October 19, 2012 updated by: Hologic, Inc.

Adiana Post-Approval Clinical Study

The Adiana Post-Approval Clinical Study (APACS) has been designed to compile information on the efficacy and safety of the Adiana Permanent Contraception System in the post market setting. Specifically, data will be collected that is relevant to the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the Adiana System for women who desire permanent birth control by occlusion of the fallopian tubes. This study is an observational study that is not intended to test specific hypotheses.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Adiana Post-Approval Clinical Study is a prospective, single armed, multi-center, observational study that is designed to provide additional efficacy and safety data regarding the FDA-approved Adiana Permanent Contraception System. This study will be conducted at 8-10 clinical sites and enroll 1000 subjects. Enrolled subjects will have baseline data collected at the time of their Adiana procedure and will then be followed for a period of 2 years with visits occurring at 3 months following the Adiana procedure, 6 months following Adiana procedure (as applicable), 12 and 24 months post relying date.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
169

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Elk Grove, California, United States, 95758
        • Sutter Medical Group
    • Illinois
      • Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States, 60004
        • WomenCare, P.C.
    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65203
        • University of Missouri Health Care
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Valaoras & Lewis Obstetrics and Gynecology
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43231
        • Complete Healthcare For Women
    • Oregon
      • Redmond, Oregon, United States, 97756
        • The Women's Center of Central Oregon
      • Salem, Oregon, United States, 97302
        • Salem Women's Clinic
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15224
        • Western Pennsylvania Hospital
    • Virginia
      • Danville, Virginia, United States, 24541
        • Ob/Gyn Associates of Danville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women, 18 - 45 years old, at risk for pregnancy, that are seeking permanent contraception using the Adiana Permanent Contraception System.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are seeking permanent sterilization
  • Women 18-45 years old
  • Subjects who are at risk of becoming pregnant
  • Subjects willing to use alternative contraception for at least three (3) months following device placement and bilateral tubal occlusion is confirmed by HSG
  • Subjects who are able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who are uncertain about their desire to end fertility
  • Clinical evidence of an active pelvic infection or history of a recent pelvic infection
  • Has intra-uterine pathology which would prevent access to either tubal ostium or the intramural portion of either fallopian tube (i.e., large submucous fibroids, uterine adhesions, apparent uni or bilateral proximal tubal occlusion, suspected unicornuate uterus, etc.)
  • Is pregnant (as evidenced by pregnancy test result) or suspects pregnancy
  • Is currently less than three (3) months since her last pregnancy
  • Has previously undergone a tubal ligation
  • Is currently taking immunosuppressive medication (e.g., steroids)
  • Has a known allergy to contrast media
  • Has external pacemaker or internal cardioverter defibrillator
  • Subject is unable to follow the protocol and return for follow up visits
  • In the opinion of the investigator, the subject has a medical condition that precludes safe participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pregnancy Rate - for Women Informed They May Rely on the Adiana System for Contraception.
Time Frame: At one and two years
The primary efficacy endpoints are the one and two year pregnancy rates among women who have hysterosalpingogram (HSG)-proven bilateral occlusion and are informed that they may rely on the Adiana System for contraception.
At one and two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Endpoints
Time Frame: At one and two years
The Adiana System will be evaluated for safety on the basis of the occurrence of adverse events which are related to the study device, unanticipated or serious.
At one and two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hologic, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Edward Evantash, MD, Hologic, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 6, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 20, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • S0210001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings