Early Detection of Cancers in Low Resource Countries
Efficacy of a Combined Program for Early Detection of Breast and Gynecological Cancers in Low Resource Countries
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Breast Cancer: women age 35-64
- Cervical Cancer: women age 30-59
- Ovarian Cancer: symptomatic post menopausal women age 50-64
- Endometrial Cancer: symptomatic post menopausal women age 50-64
Exclusion Criteria:
- women under the age of 30
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
Screening of asymptomatic women for Breast and Cervical cancer in the age group of 35-64 years.
Diagnostic assessment of symptomatic women for Ovarian and Endometrial cancer in the age group of 50-64 years.
|
Clinical Breast Examination and Sonography followed by Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of screen positive cases.
Other Names:
Visual Inspection with Acetic acid, PAP smear or Human Papilloma Virus DNA testing followed by Cryotherapy of screen positive cases.
Other Names:
Transvaginal sonogram and clinical evaluation in post menopausal women with symptoms suggestive of ovarian cancer.
Other Names:
Transvaginal sonographic assessment of the endometrial stripe in post menopausal women with abnormal bleeding.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Effectiveness of an Innovative, Low-Cost Screening and Diagnostic Methodology
Time Frame: Three (3) year interval
|
This study will examine the effectiveness of an innovative, low-cost screening and diagnostic methodology used for combined early detection of breast and gynecological cancers in low resource regions where early cancer detection strategies are not in place and cancers currently are diagnosed at advanced stages with resultant high mortality.
|
Three (3) year interval
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Effectiveness of CBE and Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection
Time Frame: Three (3) year interval
|
This study will examine the effectiveness of Clinical Breast Examination combined with Ultrasonography for breast cancer screening and detection in low resource settings where X-ray mammography proves not feasible in terms of cost, technology, and staff.
|
Three (3) year interval
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Weiwei Yang, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas
- Principal Investigator: Diljeet K Singh, MD, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
- Principal Investigator: Adhemar Longatto Filho, MD, University of Sao Paolo
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):165-75. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2251011667.
- Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology. 2001 Dec;221(3):641-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2213010364.
- Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M, Pisano ED, Jong RA, Evans WP, Morton MJ, Mahoney MC, Larsen LH, Barr RG, Farria DM, Marques HS, Boparai K; ACRIN 6666 Investigators. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2151-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2151. Erratum In: JAMA. 2010 Apr 21;303(15):1482.
- Sankaranarayanan R, Nene BM, Shastri SS, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh AM, Hingmire S, Malvi SG, Thorat R, Kothari A, Chinoy R, Kelkar R, Kane S, Desai S, Keskar VR, Rajeshwarkar R, Panse N, Dinshaw KA. HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1385-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808516.
- Goff BA, Mandel LS, Melancon CH, Muntz HG. Frequency of symptoms of ovarian cancer in women presenting to primary care clinics. JAMA. 2004 Jun 9;291(22):2705-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.22.2705.
- Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1245-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1245.
- Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA, Subak L, Scheidler J, Segal M, Brand R, Grady D. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA. 1998 Nov 4;280(17):1510-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.17.1510.
- Kuhl CK. The "coming of age" of nonmammographic screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2008 May 14;299(18):2203-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.18.2203. No abstract available.
- Tohno E, Ueno E, Watanabe H. Ultrasound screening of breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2009;16(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0082-8. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
- Schiffman M, Wacholder S. From India to the world--a better way to prevent cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1453-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0901167. No abstract available.
- Goldie SJ, Kuhn L, Denny L, Pollack A, Wright TC. Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness. JAMA. 2001 Jun 27;285(24):3107-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.24.3107. Erratum In: JAMA 2001 Sep 5;286(9):1026.
- Goff BA, Mandel LS, Drescher CW, Urban N, Gough S, Schurman KM, Patras J, Mahony BS, Andersen MR. Development of an ovarian cancer symptom index: possibilities for earlier detection. Cancer. 2007 Jan 15;109(2):221-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22371.
- Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Hallett R, Ryan A, Burnell M, Sharma A, Lewis S, Davies S, Philpott S, Lopes A, Godfrey K, Oram D, Herod J, Williamson K, Seif MW, Scott I, Mould T, Woolas R, Murdoch J, Dobbs S, Amso NN, Leeson S, Cruickshank D, McGuire A, Campbell S, Fallowfield L, Singh N, Dawnay A, Skates SJ, Parmar M, Jacobs I. Sensitivity and specificity of multimodal and ultrasound screening for ovarian cancer, and stage distribution of detected cancers: results of the prevalence screen of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Lancet Oncol. 2009 Apr;10(4):327-40. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70026-9. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
- van Nagell JR Jr, DePriest PD, Ueland FR, DeSimone CP, Cooper AL, McDonald JM, Pavlik EJ, Kryscio RJ. Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: findings of 25,000 women screened. Cancer. 2007 May 1;109(9):1887-96. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22594.
- Van den Bosch T, Van Schoubroeck D, Domali E, Vergote I, Moerman P, Amant F, Timmerman D. A thin and regular endometrium on ultrasound is very unlikely in patients with endometrial malignancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;29(6):674-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.4031.
- Tabor A, Watt HC, Wald NJ. Endometrial thickness as a test for endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;99(4):663-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01771-9.
- Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Van Limbergen E, Vergote I. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005 Aug 6-12;366(9484):491-505. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67063-8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Skin Diseases
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Uterine Neoplasms
- Genital Neoplasms, Female
- Uterine Cervical Diseases
- Uterine Diseases
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Ovarian Diseases
- Adnexal Diseases
- Gonadal Disorders
- Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
- Breast Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Breast Neoplasms
- Ovarian Neoplasms
- Endometrial Neoplasms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- WCF-2011-BRA-IND-CAM
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.