Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Vaccination With 2009 H1N1 Vaccines During Influenza Season 2010-11

September 24, 2014 updated by: Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
A cohort of 3000 adults is followed to evaluate the effectiveness of the monovalent 2009 H1N1 vaccines used 2009-2010 and seasonal influenza vaccines used 2010-2011 in preventing the first laboratory-confirmed 2009 H1N1 influenza during the influenza season 2010-11.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In the beginning of the study, changes in the background information collected in the original study (conducted 2009-2010) are asked with a questionnaire. Information on influenza vaccinations is collected with vaccination cards and monthly short message service (SMS), and verified in registers, if needed. If an epidemic caused by the 2009 H1N1 virus starts in Finland, the participants are asked to actively report symptoms of influenza like illnesses (ILI). The symptoms are also monitored by weekly SMS. In case of ILI, nasal and oral swabs are collected to verify the 2009 H1N1 influenza cases. Paired serum samples are collected at the acute on convalescence phase of the disease. The occurrence of laboratory-confirmed 2009 H1N1 influenza cases is compared between vaccinated and not (yet) vaccinated persons.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2351

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Finland
      • Tampere, Finland, 33520
        • National Institute for Health and Welfare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participation in the study will be offered to all participants of the cohort study "Evaluation of a vaccination campaign with A(H1N1)v pandemic vaccines: a prospective cohort study" AH1N1-483-09THL, who still live in the study area (city of Tampere) and who have complied to the SMS or phone follow-up. The eligibility criteria of the original study AH1N1-483-09THL were: full legal competence; community-dwelling; age 18 to 75 years, written informed consent obtained; able to communicate fluently in Finnish or Swedish and able to adhere to all protocol required study procedures without any special burden or risk. Originally, 3500 persons participated in the study

Description

Inclusion criteria for the interview follow-up:

  • Participating in the study "Evaluation of a vaccination campaign with A(H1N1)v pandemic vaccines: a prospective cohort study" (AH1N1-483-09THL)
  • Assigned to use the services of Tampere health care centre;
  • Written consent for the interview follow-up phase obtained by mail;
  • Able to adhere to all protocol-required study procedures without any special burden or risk, as judged by the participant himself/herself

Inclusion criteria for the confirmation of 2009 H1N1 influenza cases:

  • Participating in the study interview follow-up of the current study 'Evaluation the effectiveness of vaccination with 2009 H1N1 vaccines during influenza season 2010-11 (H1N1-495-10THL)
  • Assigned to use the services of Tampere health care centre
  • Written informed consent for the confirmation phase obtained at the first study visit
  • Able to adhere to all protocol required study procedures without any special burden or risk, as judged by the investigator or designate

Exclusion criteria:

  • No specific exclusion criteria will be applied

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Vaccinated persons
The participants have taken one or more doses of 2009 H1N1 vaccine, either as a monovalent vaccine or as a part of a trivalent seasonal 2010-2011 influenza vaccine
Other: Follow-up
Questionnaires, interviews, nasal/oral and serum samples, register data
Not (yet) vaccinated persons
The participants do not want to take any 2009 H1N1 vaccine or have not received any yet
Other: Follow-up
Questionnaires, interviews, nasal/oral and serum samples, register data

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine the effectiveness of 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccination in preventing the first episode of laboratory-confirmed influenza caused by the 2009 H1N1 virus during the season 2010-11 among vaccinated adults as compared to unvaccinated adults
Time Frame: September 2010 to April 2011
September 2010 to April 2011

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To explore the ability of different vaccination regimens to prevent 2009 H1N1 influenza
Time Frame: September 2010 to April 2011
September 2010 to April 2011
To explore the effectiveness of the 2009 H1N1 vaccines in subgroups stratified by age
Time Frame: September 2010 to April 2011
September 2010 to April 2011
To evaluate the incidence, severity and possible complications of laboratory-confirmed infection with the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus
Time Frame: September 2010 to April 2011
September 2010 to April 2011

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Terhi M Kilpi, MD, PhD, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 20, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 20, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 21, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 25, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 24, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H1N1-495-10THL
  • 2010-021033-30 (EudraCT Number)
  • R10075M (Other Identifier: The ethics committee of the Pirkanmaa Hospital District (PSHP))
  • 81/2010 (Other Identifier: Finnish Medicines Agency)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings