Prevenar (PCV-7) Post-Licensure Safety Study In Russia

July 26, 2012 updated by: Pfizer

Prevenar Post-Licensure Safety Study in Russia: Frequency Of Fever Post Vaccination

This study is planned to monitor the local and/or systemic reactions and compatibility of PCV-7 with routine vaccines in the Russian National immunization schedule. Consistent with the observational nature of this protocol, Prevenar will be administered as standard of care.

The aim of this study is to estimate the incidence of febrile reactions more than 38.0 degrees Celsius, specifically (≥38 to < 39 degrees C; > 39 to < 40 degrees C and > 40 degrees C, and the frequency of other local or systemic reactions following vaccination with Prevenar (PCV-7) co-administered with other routine childhood vaccines under the conditions of routine daily use in the Russian Federation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119049
        • Russian State Medical University
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119296
        • Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197022
        • Research Institute of Childhood Infections
      • Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation, 620085
        • City Children's Clinical Hospital #8

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 1 year (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Infants and Children from 3 months to 23 months at enrollment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infants eligible for Prevenar vaccination according to the Regulatory approved terms of the marketing authorization in the Russian Federation:
  • Infants from 3 months up to 23 months of age who may benefit from active immunization against disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes 4, 6B, 9V, 14, 18C, 19F and 23F (including sepsis, meningitis, pneumonia, bacteraemia and acute otitis media).
  • Parents or legal guardians willing and able to complete the diary cards.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients;
  • Hypersensitivity to diphtheria toxoid;
  • Age less than 3 months or greater than or equal to 2 years at enrollment;
  • Contraindications as listed in the Package Insert / Russian SmPC for either Prevenar or for any concomitantly used other vaccines;
  • Previously vaccinated with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine;
  • Prophylactic use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications and/or acetaminophen (e.g., paracetamol). However, acetaminophen/paracetamol may be administered for treatment of fever, pain, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
healthy children after vaccination
Other: Non-interventional observational study
Non-interventional observational study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Febrile Reactions Post-dose 1
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 1
Febrile reactions were defined as reactions which causes a rise in body temperature following vaccination in children. Fever was defined as a temperature of greater than or equal to (>=) 38 degrees Celsius (C). Percentage of participants with febrile reaction of >=38 degrees C to less than or equal to (<=) 39 degrees C, >39 degrees C to <=40 degrees C and >40 degrees C were observed.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 1
Percentage of Participants With Febrile Reactions Post-dose 2
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 2
Febrile reactions were defined as reactions which causes a rise in body temperature following vaccination in children. Fever was defined as a temperature of >=38 degrees C. Percentage of participants with febrile reaction of >=38 degrees C to <=39 degrees C was observed.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 2
Percentage of Participants With Febrile Reactions Post-dose 3
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 3
Febrile reactions were defined as reactions which causes a rise in body temperature following vaccination in children. Fever was defined as a temperature of >=38 degrees C. Percentage of participants with febrile reaction of >=38 degrees C to <=39 degrees C was observed.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 3
Percentage of Participants With Febrile Reactions Post-dose 4
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 4
Febrile reactions were defined as reactions which causes a rise in body temperature following vaccination in children. Fever was defined as a temperature of >=38 degrees C. Percentage of participants with febrile reaction of >=38 degrees C was observed.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Pre-Specified Local Reactions Post-dose 1
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 1
Local reactions were reported using an electronic diary. Tenderness was scaled as Any (tenderness present); Significant (present and interfered with limb movement). Induration and redness were scaled as Any (induration or redness present); Mild (<2.5 centimeters [cm]); Moderate (>=2.5 cm to <5.0 cm); Severe (>=5.0 cm). Participants may be represented in more than 1 category. Solicited local reactions included redness, swelling and tenderness while unsolicited local reactions included injection site hematoma, injection site hemorrhage, injection site induration and injection site warmth.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 1
Percentage of Participants With Pre-Specified Local Reactions Post-dose 2
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 2
Local reactions were reported using an electronic diary. Tenderness was scaled as Any (tenderness present); Significant (present and interfered with limb movement). Induration and redness were scaled as Any (induration or redness present); Mild (<2.5 cm); Moderate (>=2.5 cm to <5.0 cm); Severe (>=5.0 cm). Participants may be represented in more than 1 category. Solicited local reactions included redness, swelling and tenderness while unsolicited local reactions included injection site hematoma, injection site hemorrhage, injection site induration and injection site warmth.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 2
Percentage of Participants With Pre-Specified Local Reactions Post-dose 3
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 3
Local reactions were reported using an electronic diary. Tenderness was scaled as Any (tenderness present); Significant (present and interfered with limb movement). Induration and redness were scaled as Any (induration or redness present); Mild (<2.5 cm); Moderate (>=2.5 cm to <5.0 cm); Severe (>=5.0 cm). Participants may be represented in more than 1 category. Solicited local reactions included redness, swelling and tenderness while unsolicited local reactions included injection site hematoma, injection site hemorrhage, injection site induration and injection site warmth.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 3
Percentage of Participants With Pre-Specified Local Reactions Post-dose 4
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 4
Local reactions were reported using an electronic diary. Tenderness was scaled as Any (tenderness present); Significant (present and interfered with limb movement). Induration and redness were scaled as Any (induration or redness present); Mild (<2.5 cm); Moderate (>=2.5 cm to <5.0 cm); Severe (>=5.0 cm). Participants may be represented in more than 1 category. Solicited local reactions included redness, swelling and tenderness while unsolicited local reactions included injection site hematoma, injection site hemorrhage, injection site induration and injection site warmth.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 4
Percentage of Participants With Pre-Specified Systemic Events Post-dose 1
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 1
Systemic events (any fever >=38 degrees C, decreased appetite, diarrhea, restless sleep, unusual crying, unusual fussiness, unusual irritability, and vomiting) were reported using an electronic diary. Participants may be represented in more than 1 category.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 1
Percentage of Participants With Pre-Specified Systemic Events Post-dose 2
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 2
Systemic events (any fever >=38 degrees C, decreased appetite, diarrhea, restless sleep, unusual crying, unusual fussiness, unusual irritability, and vomiting) were reported using an electronic diary. Participants may be represented in more than 1 category.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 2
Percentage of Participants With Pre-Specified Systemic Events Post-dose 3
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 3
Systemic events (any fever >=38 degrees C, decreased appetite, diarrhea, restless sleep, unusual crying, unusual fussiness, unusual irritability, and vomiting) were reported using an electronic diary. Participants may be represented in more than 1 category.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 3
Percentage of Participants With Pre-Specified Systemic Events Post-dose 4
Time Frame: Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 4
Systemic events (any fever >=38 degrees C, decreased appetite, diarrhea, restless sleep, unusual crying, unusual fussiness, unusual irritability, and vomiting) were reported using an electronic diary. Participants may be represented in more than 1 category.
Day 1 to Day 3 post-dose 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Pfizer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 31, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 26, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 0887X1-4596
  • B1841011

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings