Early Lung Cancer Diagnosis in HIV Infected Population With an Important Smoking History With Low Dose CT: a Pilot Study (EP48 HIV CHEST)

April 21, 2026 updated by: ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases
Early Lung Cancer diagnosis in a HIV-infected population with an important smoking history with low-dose CT: a pilot study: the HIV-CHEST study Objectives The main objective of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of lung cancers detected by low-dose computed tomography (CT) in a HIV-infected population with an important smoking history. Other objectives are (1) the evaluation of the types of lung cancers in this population, as well as (2) the staging of non small cell lung cancers, (3) the description of risk factors for all lung cancers, if they are numerous enough, and (4) the number of complications of diagnosis procedures during the study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Background Epidemiological studies in France and in the western world have shown that lung cancers are the first cause of mortality amongst the non-AIDS classifying cancers in HIV-infected individuals, despite the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapies. Compared to the general population, there is an increased risk of lung cancer in HIV-infected individuals, even after adjustment on smoking and age, estimated to be around 2.6 compared to the general population. Outcomes are dismal, as diagnoses in HIV-infected individuals are usually made at very advanced stages (usually stage III or IV) without screening. Two non-randomized studies of CT-screening in a non HIV-infected population exposed to smoking have shown an important rate of early lung cancer detection and a high level of survival at 5 or 10 years. Despite a probable high prevalence of lung cancer in the HIV-infected population, no lung cancer screening or early diagnosis studies have been realised, and the prevalence is yet to be determined. We deduced from different studies of non HIV-infected populations a 3% prevalence in the HIV-infected population.

Methods Prospective multicentric and national study evaluating the prevalence of lung cancers through low-dose CT of 450 individuals with a known HIV-infection, with a nadir level of TCD4 cells < 350/µl, ≥ 40 years old and with a smoking history ≥ 20 packs a year (either active or with <3 years of weaning). CT interpretations and lung biopsies are guided by a suggested workup algorithm, which is not imposed in each HIV-caring centre.

Inclusion and follow up period Inclusion period will be 9 months, followed, in case of the discovery of a small nodule, by a CT follow up scheme of up to two years from first diagnosis. The study closes after 26 months of follow up.

Awaited results For the first time, this prospective study of lung cancers will estimate the prevalence of these cancers screened in the HIV-infected population. Risks associated with the incidence of this cancer will be investigated, including potential immune factors. An increased number of stage I non small cell lung cancers are expected.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
450

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Montpellier, France, 34
        • Makinson

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 40 years
  • able to give written consent
  • HIV positive serology
  • Covered by French Social Security
  • Nadir L TCD4 < 350/µl
  • Rate of LTCD4 > 100/µl at inclusion
  • Addiction to smoking > 20 packages years, active person or deprived since < 3 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who suffered from comorbidity
  • unaffiliated to the social healthy security french system
  • Presence of an evolutionary cancer
  • any evolutionary pathology classifying AIDS
  • Pregnancy
  • Recent lung infection (< 2 months)
  • Be under protection (saving) of justice

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: CT screening
CT interpretations and lung biopsies are guided by a suggested workup algorithm, which is not imposed in each HIV-caring centre
Radiation: Low dose computed tomography (CT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the prevalence of lung cancers detected by lowdose computed tomography
Time Frame: Month 0
Month 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
the types of lung cancers in this population,
Time Frame: Month 1 Month 3 Month 12 Month 24 Month 26
Month 1 Month 3 Month 12 Month 24 Month 26
the staging of non small cell lung cancers,
Time Frame: Month 1 Month 3 Month 12 Month 24 Month 26
Month 1 Month 3 Month 12 Month 24 Month 26
description of risk factors for all lung cancers,
Time Frame: Month 1 Month 3 Month 12 Month 24 Month 26
Month 1 Month 3 Month 12 Month 24 Month 26
number of complications of diagnosis procedures during study
Time Frame: Month 1 Month 3 Month 12 Month 24 Month 26
Month 1 Month 3 Month 12 Month 24 Month 26

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alain Makinson, University Hospital, Montpellier
  • Principal Investigator: Antoine Cheret, CHU Tourcoing
  • Principal Investigator: Sophie Abgrall, Hospital AVICENNE
  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Delamonicca, CHU Nice
  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Tattevin, Pontchaillou
  • Principal Investigator: Isabelle Poizot Martin, St Marguerite Marseille
  • Principal Investigator: Francois Raffi, Hotel Dieu Nantes
  • Principal Investigator: Claudine Duvivier, Necker Paris
  • Principal Investigator: David Zucman, Foch Suresnes
  • Principal Investigator: Jean Louis Couderc, Foch Suresnes
  • Principal Investigator: Tristan Ferry, La Croix Rousse Lyon
  • Principal Investigator: Jean Marc Mauboussin, Nîmes, CH Caremeau

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 16, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 21, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AO 781-38

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings