An Efficacy Trial of Electroacupuncture at Points of Bilateral BL33 for Mild and Moderate Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

May 18, 2013 updated by: Liu Zhishun, Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
To evaluate efficacy of BL33 for mild and moderate benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).There are trials showing that electroacupuncture on BL33 for mild and moderate BPH is more effective than terazosin. It could reduce the International Prostate Syndrome Score (IPSS) by 6.68±2.84(39.79%),lower urinary symptoms bother of score(BS) and bladder residual urine, and increase maximum urinary flow rate.But the efficacy of BL33 has not been studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate efficacy of BL32 for mild and moderate BPH by comparison with non-acupoint group.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

efficacy here means specific effect(or active ingredient) of the point BL33.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100053
        • Guang'an Men Hospotal Affiliated to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 50-70 years old
  • Mild to moderate BPH evaluated by I-PSS
  • Patients having urinary dysfunction more than 3 months
  • Patients with stable life signs
  • no use of α1 receptor blocker, 5α-reductase inhibitor or traditional Chinese medicine for over 1 week
  • Volunteer to join this research and sign the written informed consent prior to receiving treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urinary dysfunction caused by gonorrhea or urinary tract infection
  • Oliguria and anuria caused by urinary calculi, prostate cancer, bladder tumor and acute/chronic renal failure
  • Urinary dysfunction caused by neurogenic bladder, bladder neck fibrotic and urethral stricture
  • Failure of invasive therapy for prostatic obstruction
  • Injured local organs, muscle and nerve caused by pelvic operation or historical trauma
  • Upper urinary obstruction and hydrocele combined with damaged renal function due to BPH diagnosed by B-ultrasound
  • Patients who can't stick to treatment because of economic reason, far distance between home and the hospital or difficult walking etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: acupoint
Needle at bilateral BL33 60-80 mm with a 45°angle.A feeling of soreness and distension will be felt when needling into the 3rd posterior sacral foramina(S3).Needle with a 100-125 mm long needle without lifting, thrusting or rotating.G6805-2 electric stimulator (produced by Shanghai Huayi Medical Instrument Co.Ltd)is put on with Sparse-dense wave,20Hz. Stop turning up the current intensity when patients could not stand. There are 5 sessions in the first two weeks and 3 sessions in the last two weeks, 30 min/session.
Device: needle
For the acupoint group,needle on bilateral BL33 60-80mm with a 45°angle. A feeling of soreness and distension will be felt when needling into the 3rd posterior sacral foramina(S3).Needle with a 100-125 mm long needle without lifting, thrusting or rotating.An electric stimulator is put on.G6805-2 electric stimulator (produced by Shanghai Huayi Medical Instrument Co.Ltd), Sparse-dense wave,20Hz. Stop turning up the current intensity when patients could not stand. 5 times for the first two weeks and 3 times for the last two weeks, 30 min/time.The non-point group take the place 2 cun far from BL33 on the outside horizontally as the non-point and the manipulation methods are the same with those of the point group.
Other Names:
  • acupuncture
  • electroacupuncture
SHAM_COMPARATOR: non-acupoint
Take the place 2 cun far from BL33 on the outside horizontally as the non-point. Needle on the non-point for 60-80mm with a 45°angle. A feeling of soreness and distension will be felt .Needle with a 100-125mm long needle without lifting, thrusting or rotating.Sparse-dense wave,20Hz. Stop turning up the current intensity when patients could not stand. 5 times for the first two weeks and 3 times for the last two weeks, 30 min/time.
Device: needle
For the acupoint group,needle on bilateral BL33 60-80mm with a 45°angle. A feeling of soreness and distension will be felt when needling into the 3rd posterior sacral foramina(S3).Needle with a 100-125 mm long needle without lifting, thrusting or rotating.An electric stimulator is put on.G6805-2 electric stimulator (produced by Shanghai Huayi Medical Instrument Co.Ltd), Sparse-dense wave,20Hz. Stop turning up the current intensity when patients could not stand. 5 times for the first two weeks and 3 times for the last two weeks, 30 min/time.The non-point group take the place 2 cun far from BL33 on the outside horizontally as the non-point and the manipulation methods are the same with those of the point group.
Other Names:
  • acupuncture
  • electroacupuncture

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of IPSS at the 6th Week Compared With Baseline(Intention to Treat)
Time Frame: baseline and the 6th week
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Range:0-35(0 is best，35 is worst, ordinal),6 week mean minus baseline mean.And analysis for this outcome measure is based on ITT population.
baseline and the 6th week
Change of International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS) at the 6th Week Compared With Baseline(Per-protocol).
Time Frame: baseline and the 6th week
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Range:0-35(0 is best，35 is worst, ordinal),6 week mean minus baseline mean. And analysis for this outcome measure is based on per-protocol population.
baseline and the 6th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Bladder Residual Urine at the 6th Week
Time Frame: baseline and the 6th week
Bladder residual urine was used to assess the bladder function, 6 week mean minus baseline mean
baseline and the 6th week
Change of Maximum Urinary Flow Rate(Qmax)at the 6th Week
Time Frame: baseline and the 6th week
Maximum urinary flow rate was used to assess the bladder function, 6 week mean minus baseline mean
baseline and the 6th week
Change of International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at the 18th Week
Time Frame: baseline and the 18th week
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) Range:0-35(0 is best，35 is worst, ordinal),18 week mean minus baseline mean.
baseline and the 18th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Guang'anmen Hospital of China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 8, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 27, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 18, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2009S208

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings