Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of BOL-303259-X to Latanoprost in Subjects With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension (Voyager)

June 27, 2018 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

A Randomized, Multicenter, Single-Masked, Parallel-Group Dose Finding Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of BOL-303259-X to Latanoprost in Subjects With Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

The objective of this clinical investigation is to determine the most effective drug concentration(s) of BOL-303259-X in the reduction of IOP in order to support further clinical development of an appropriate dose with regard to efficacy, and ocular and systemic safety.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
413

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14609
        • Bausch & Lomb, Inc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of open angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OH) in one or both eyes.
  • IOP requirements at Visit 3, A mean/median IOP ≥ 26 mmHg at a minimum of 1 time point, ≥ 24 mmHg at a minimum of 1 time point, and ≥ 22 mmHg at 1 time point in the same eye, and Mean/median IOP ≤ 32 mmHg in both eyes at all 3 measurement time points.
  • Subjects with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), using Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol, of +0.7 logMAR units (Snellen equivalent ~20/100) or better in either eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with a known hypersensitivity or contraindications to latanoprost or any of the ingredients in the study drugs.
  • Subjects with known contraindications to nitric oxide (NO) treatment.
  • Subjects whose central corneal thickness was greater than 600um in either eye.
  • Subjects with any condition that prevented reliable applanation tonometry in either eye.
  • Subjects with advanced glaucoma and subjects with a cup/disc ratio greater than 0.8 or a history of split fixation, or a field loss threatening fixation in either eye.
  • Subjects with previous or active corneal disease.
  • Subjects with a history of severe dry eye.
  • Subjects with monophthalmia.
  • Subjects with optic disc hemorrhage.
  • Subjects with a history of central retinal vein and artery occlusion.
  • Subjects with a history of macular edema.
  • Subjects with any intraocular infection, inflammation, or laser surgery within the previous 6 months from Visit 1 (Screening).
  • Subjects who had incisional ocular surgery or severe trauma within the previous 6 months from Visit 1 (Screening).
  • Subjects with very narrow angles (3 quadrants with less than Grade 2 according to Shaffer's anterior chamber angle grading system) and subjects with angle closure, congenital and secondary glaucoma, and subjects with history of angle closure in either eye.
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of a clinically significant or progressive retinal disease in either eye.
  • Subjects who were expected to require treatment with ocular or systemic corticosteroids.
  • Subjects who were in need of any other topical or systemic treatment of OAG or OHT.
  • Subjects with an anticipated need to initiate or modify medication (systemic or topical) that was known to affect IOP during the study period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: BOL-303259-X
ophthalmic solution
Drug: BOL-303259-X
ophthalmic solution, various concentrations, once daily (QD) 28 days
Other Names:
  • latanoprostene bunod
Active Comparator: Latanoprost
ophthalmic solution
Drug: Latanoprost
0.005% ophthalmic solution, QD 28 days
Other Names:
  • Xalatan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean Diurnal IOP at Visit 6 (Day 28)
Time Frame: Baseline and Visit 6 (Day 28)
Determine the most effective drug concentration(s) of BOL-303259-X in the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and compared to latanoprost
Baseline and Visit 6 (Day 28)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Mean Diurnal IOP at Visits 4,5, and 7
Time Frame: Baseline and Visit 4 (Day 7), Visit 5 (day 14), and Visit 7 (Day 29)
Determine the most effective drug concentration(s) of BOL-303259-X in the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) and compared to latanoprost
Baseline and Visit 4 (Day 7), Visit 5 (day 14), and Visit 7 (Day 29)
IOP </=18mm Hg
Time Frame: Visit 4 (Day 7), Visit 5 (day 14), Visit 6 (Day 28) and Visit 7 (Day 29)
Determine the number of subjects with mean diurnal IOP </=18 mm Hg with BOL-303259-X versus latanoprost ophthalmic solution
Visit 4 (Day 7), Visit 5 (day 14), Visit 6 (Day 28) and Visit 7 (Day 29)
Change in IOP at Specified Time Points (8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM) at Visit 6 (Day 28)
Time Frame: baseline and Visit 6 (Day 28)
The change in the observed mean study eye IOP from baseline (Visit 3, Day 1) at specified time points (8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM) at Visit 6 (Day 28)
baseline and Visit 6 (Day 28)
Change in IOP at Specified Time Points (8 AM, 12 PM, 4 PM) at Visits 4, 5, and 7 (Days 7, 14, and 29)
Time Frame: baseline and Visits 4, 5 and 7 (Days 7, 14, and 29)
The change in the observed mean study eye IOP from baseline (Visit 3, Day 1) at specified time points (points 8 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM) at Visits 4, 5, and 7 (Days 7, 14, and 29)
baseline and Visits 4, 5 and 7 (Days 7, 14, and 29)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Rabia Ozden, MD, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 13, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 20, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 22, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 11, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 27, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 659

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings