The Clinical Role of Intravenous Glutamine in Trauma Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition (GLINT)

May 22, 2012 updated by: Ruqaiya Al-Balushi, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Effect of Intravenous GLutamine Supplementation IN Trauma Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition Study Protocol (GLINT Study): A Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

The purpose of this trial is to investigate if pharmacologically safe dose intravenous glutamine dipeptide supplementation to multiple trauma patients receiving enteral nutrition is associated with improved clinical outcomes in terms of decreased organ dysfunction, infectious complications, and other secondary outcomes

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Trauma Patients are characterized by alteration in the immune response, increased exposure to infectious complications, sepsis, and consequently organ failure and death. Glutamine supplementation to parenteral nutrition is one of the nutritional interventions that have been proven to be associated with improved survival rate, decreased infectious morbidity, costs, intensive care unit, and hospital length of stay. However, glutamine supplementation in patients receiving enteral nutrition and its best route are still controversial. A number of trials investigated the beneficial effects of intravenous alanyl-glutamine supplementation in critically ill patients receiving enteral nutrition. However, these trials were: pilot trials, investigated surrogate outcomes, or supplementation was for a short period of time. Therefore, a well designed trial is needed to investigate the effect of intravenous alanyl-glutamine supplementation in critically ill patients with multiple trauma receiving enteral nutrition on major clinical outcomes.

Our hypothesis is that trauma patients receiving standard enteral nutrition supplemented with intravenous alanyl-glutamine will demonstrate improved clinical outcomes compared to patients receiving standard enteral nutrition without supplementation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
88

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4029
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-58 years
  • Patients admitted with a diagnosis of multiple trauma requiring enteral feeding for > 48 hours
  • Expected length of stay in ICU > 48 hours
  • Has a functional access for enteral tube feeding and a central access for administration of test solution
  • Negative Beta HCG (pregnancy test) in females (18-60 years)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Significant hepatic failure (Patients with Childs C Cirrhosis)
  • Severe renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 50 ml/min)
  • Patients with severe metabolic acidosis (pH <7.35)
  • Not expected to be in the ICU > 48 hours (due to imminent death)
  • Unable to tolerate enteral nutrition within 72 hours
  • Enrolment in other ICU intervention study if contraindicated
  • Patients in whom parenteral nutrition is required from the outset
  • Absolute contraindication to enteral nutrition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: alanyl-glutamine
Intravenous alanyl-glutamine (0.5 g/kg body weight/day)
Dietary supplement: Dipeptiven
Intravenous alanyl-glutamine (0.5 g/kg body weight; i.e. 0.35 g L-glutamine / kg body weight; continuous infusion (20-24 hr/day) via central venous access for a maximum duration of 3 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Fresenius Kabi
Placebo Comparator: normal saline
Intravenous placebo (normal saline; 0.9 %)
Dietary supplement: normal saline
0.5 g/kg bod weight /day, continuous infusion (20-24 hr/day) via central venous access for a maximum duration of 3 weeks
Other Names:
  • NaCl

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in daily total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA)each day over 10 days.
Time Frame: daily until discharge from intensive care unit, death or maximum duration of 10 days.
The change in daily total SOFA score plotted each day over 10 days, where we will compare the regression slope between the two arms of the study.
daily until discharge from intensive care unit, death or maximum duration of 10 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in daily total Sequential Organ failure Assessment Score (SOFA) on the last day of treatment as a measure of severity of organ dysfunction.
Time Frame: Last day of treatment
Last day of treatment
Number of infections that are documented during intensive care unit stay.
Time Frame: During intensive care unit stay.
During intensive care unit stay.
Number of deaths occuring on or before day 60.
Time Frame: within 60 days.
within 60 days.
Length of stay in intensive care unit.
Time Frame: At discharge from intensive care unit.
At discharge from intensive care unit.
Length of stay in hospital.
Time Frame: At hospital discharge.
Length of stay in hospital (if delayed discharge due to placement problems, will record from the date the patient is regarded as fit for discharge by medical staff).
At hospital discharge.
Number of days on mechanical ventilation.
Time Frame: during intensive care unit stay.
during intensive care unit stay.
Number of days of antibiotic use during intensive care unit stay.
Time Frame: during intensive care unit stay.
during intensive care unit stay.
Fat free mass and fat percentage as a measure of body composition by Bioelectric Impedance analysis (BIA).
Time Frame: every 2 days until discharge from the intensive care unit.
every 2 days until discharge from the intensive care unit.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Lipman, MBBCh, MD, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hpsoital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 24, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 22, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HREC/10/QRBW/131

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings