Lactobacillus Reuteri DSM 17938 in Functional Constipation (LRFC)

March 26, 2014 updated by: Francesco Russo, Azienda Ospedaliera Specializzata in Gastroenterologia Saverio de Bellis

Effect of Lactobacillus Reuteri DSM 17938 on Gut Motility in Patients With Functional Constipation

The diffusion of gastrointestinal (GI) chronic diseases is significantly increased during the last century in western countries. In the USA and Northern Europe, constipation is twofold the prevalence found in the East and Southern Europe. In Italy, constipation affects up to 15-17% of the whole adult population. Of them, more than half (about 10%) treats this disorder by assuming laxatives, while the remaining does not even assume drugs. A close relationship between intestinal environment and bacterial flora has been found. As a matter of fact changes in the intestinal physiology can modify the composition of bacterial flora as well as modifications in the intestinal microbiota can modify the physiology of the gut. The probiotic effects on the GI motility can be due to substances released by bacteria and/or products of their fermentation. Also, probiotic may indirectly act by the release of neuroendocrine factors and/or substances released by the immune system. Clinically, it has already been demonstrated that probiotics exert a positive effect on symptoms and intestinal habit in constipated IBS patients. In this framework, the idea to perform a long lasting intervention study in patients with functional constipation treated with probiotics sounds convincing. The present study is a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, monocentric study, concerning the evaluation of efficacy of 3 months administration of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 in patients with functional constipation, as defined by the Rome criteria. Clinical, physiological, hematological and immunologic variables will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Bari
      • Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy, 70013
        • National Institute for Digestive Diseases IRCCS "S. de Bellis"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Fulfilment of the Rome Criteria III for functional constipation
  • Availability of at least one GI imaging study during the last five years (colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, abdominal ultrasound, barium enema)
  • Commitment to availability for the whole study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major abdominal surgery
  • Presence of any concomitant diseases such as organic GI diseases and/or lactose and gluten intolerance; medical or psychiatric illness
  • Alarming symptoms (rectal bleeding, weight loss, etc)
  • Family history of peptic ulcer, colorectal cancer, or IBD
  • Abnormal laboratory data or thyroid function.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Other: Placebo Group
Placebo tabs identical in form, taste and consistency to active tabs
Experimental: L. reuteri DSM 17938
Dietary supplement: L. reuteri DSM 17938
L. reuteri will be administered at 1x10^8 CFU dosage in form of tabs. In order to ensure colonization (run in), 4 tabs will be administered per os daily (4x10^8CFU/die) for 15 days. Then administration will continue with 2 tabs daily (2x10^8 CFU/die) for 90 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms after 3 months of probiotic administration
Time Frame: Before the start of the study (Time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (Time 90)
Validated and structured questionnaires to evaluate gastrointestinal symptoms, to confirm functional constipation diagnosis and to exclude IBS variant constipation. Score of gastrointestinal symptoms with Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Score (GSRS); Constipation Symptom Score (CSS); Constipation QoL, Constipation Rome criteria, Diary for the symptoms and for intestinal behavior. These questionnaires will be administered at baseline, after 45 days of treatment, and at the end of treatment.
Before the start of the study (Time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (Time 90)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in metabolic parameters after 3 months of probiotic administration
Time Frame: Before the start of the study (time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (Time 90)
Lipidic and glucidic profile; evaluation of circulating immunological parameters, short chain fatty acid (SCFA)faecal concentrations. The evaluations will be performed at baseline, after 45 days of treatment and at the end of treatment.
Before the start of the study (time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (Time 90)
Changes in physiological parameters after 3 months of probiotic administration
Time Frame: Before the start of the study (Time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (Time 90)
Physiological parameters: Quali/Quantitative evaluation of the colonic transit time (TTC) with radiopaque markers (qualitative study : RX after 3 days from the 20 markers assumption. Quantitative study: RX after 3 days from the assumption of 10 markers a day for 6 days in patients with TTC delayed), non invasive evaluation of gastric electrical activity and gastric emptying time (cutaneous electrography (EGG) and 13C octanoic acid breath test). The evaluations will be performed at baseline, after 45 days of treatment and at the end of treatment
Before the start of the study (Time 0) and after 90 days of treatment (Time 90)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Azienda Ospedaliera Specializzata in Gastroenterologia Saverio de Bellis

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Giuseppe Riezzo, M.D., Azienda Ospedaliera Specializzata in Gastroenterologia IRCCS "Saverio de Bellis"

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 17, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 19, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 22, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 27, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 26, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1026D

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings