Cancer Stem Cell Markers and Prognostic Markers in Circulating Tumor Cells

August 16, 2018 updated by: Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Prevalence of Stem Cell and Prognostic Markers in Circulating Tumor Cells of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy

The study will enroll patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy. A total of approximately 22 cc of blood will be drawn during various chemotherapy infusions. Additional proposed laboratory studies may unravel important biological insights into the relationship of circulating tumor cell genomic and genetic profiles as they compare to the primary tumors. Additionally the investigators hope to gain an understanding of potential subgroups of patients that have very high numbers of circulating tumor cells or those with early relapse of circulating tumor cells after early reduction of circulating tumor cell numbers.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a five year survival of <10% and is the cause of death of nearly 50,000 individuals in the United States each year. Current first and second line therapies for mCRC include FOLFOX, XELOX, or FOLFIRI in combination with Bevacizumab or Cetuximab or Panitumumab, as well as Xeloda, camptosar or infusional 5-FU within various less intensive regimens for patients who cannot tolerate full-dose chemotherapy. Current practice involves evaluation of response by imaging at 2-3 months after initiation of therapy. Recent studies have demonstrated that the number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the blood of patients with mCRC has independent prognostic value in terms of reflecting disease burden as well as indicating response to therapy. The use of CTC counts offers the possibility of predicting response in treated patients at an earlier time than through standard means by using CT scans. The investigators hypothesize that subsets of CTCs with cancer stem cell (CSC) markers or other known prognostic markers may improve the prognostic value of CTC evaluation in the course of therapy of patients with mCRC. The protocol will use Veridex CellSearch technology and will when possible compare this to other emerging technologies including microfluidic devices that can isolate CTCs or GFP-expressing adenoviruses that replicate in telomerase-expressing epithelial tumor cells ex-vivo. The protocol will enroll 200 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving therapy. Additional proposed laboratory studies may unravel important biological insights into the relationship of CTC genomic and genetic profiles as they compare to the primary tumors. Additionally the investigators hope to gain an understanding of potential subgroups of patients that have very high numbers of CTCs or those with early relapse of CTC after early reduction of CTC numbers. The impact of this research may be in better prediction of response to mCRC therapy so that patients can be treated with second line or other experimental therapy if they are unlikely to respond to their current therapy as predicted by CTC evaluation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer, either newly diagnosed or recurrent, with measurable disease that has not been irradiated within the last 5 weeks.
  • Age > 18 years old
  • ECOG performance status 0-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received prior therapy in the last 5 weeks
  • Ongoing therapy with a particular regimen that was initiated prior to enrollment and lack of availability of baseline CTC evaluation
  • Patient with concurrent diagnosis of other active solid malignancies will be exclude
  • Patient life expectancy of less than six weeks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Blood draws
Laboratory studies will be performed at baseline; Cycle 1, Day 1; Cycle 1, Day 7; Cycle 2, Day 1; Cycle 3, Day 1; Cycle 4, Day 1; Cycle 6, Day 1; Cycle 12, Day 1.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary endpoint: correlation of stem cell markers on CTCs with response to therapy
Time Frame: 3 years
Correlate the presence of stem cell markers and prognostic markers on circulating tumor cells with response to therapy for advanced colorectal cancer, as well as overall survival
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Outcome: Correlation of stem cell markers in primary tumors with stem cell markers in CTCs
Time Frame: 3 years
Evaluate the primary tumor if available for stem cell markers and prognostic markers. Perform genomic analysis of CTC DNA. Compare genomic analysis of primary tumor and CTC DNA. Evaluate CTC gene expression profiles and compare with primary tumor profiles. Evaluate emerging microfluidic devices in pilot studies that use drops of blood for CTC analysis.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wafik S El-Deiry, MD, PhD, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 28, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 28, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 31, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 16, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PSHCI 10-066
  • PSHMC IRB No. 34902EP (Other Identifier: Penn State Hershey Medical Center IRB No. 34902EP)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

To evaluate if data is valuable

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings