Comparison of Epicardial Versus Conventional Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (REVERT)
Randomized Study of Endovascular Versus Epicardial Lead Placement for Resynchronization Therapy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10025
- St.Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic NYHA class III or IV heart failure from idiopathic or ischemic heart failure
- QRS interval greater than or equal to 130 msec
- Left ventricular end diastolic diameter greater than or equal to 55 mm
- left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 35
- Willingness to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute renal failure; active GI bleeding; unexplained fever which may be due to an infection
- untreated active infection
- acute stroke
- severe uncontrolled systemic hypertension
- severe systemic electrolyte imbalance
- severe concomitant illness that drastically shortens life expectancy
- severe coagulopathy
- history of severe COPD and inability to tolerate single lung ventilation
- History of prior left sided thoracotomy
- history of recent intravenous drug use
- concomitant psychiatric diagnosis that impairs patient's ability to comply with study protocol
- participation in another investigational protocol
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Robotic placement of CS lead
CS leads placed epicardially in the area of increased dyssynchrony as demonstrated by low dose dobutamine stress testing.
|
Epicardial leads will be placed on the left ventricle in the area of the most dyssynchrony .
the leads will be attached to a Medtronic Cardiac resynchronization/ AICD/ device
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Transvenous placement of CS lead
CS lead will be placed transvenously
|
Conventional placement of left ventricular leads performed in the electrophysiology department.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
CHF Hospitalizations & mortality
Time Frame: one year post implant.
|
Heart failure and mortality will be assesd along with six minute hall walk tests
|
one year post implant.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 04-052
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.