Safety and Efficacy of ORM-12741 in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease (ALPO)
Safety and Efficacy of ORM-12741 on Cognitive and Behavioral Symptoms in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Turku, Finland, 20520
- Clinical Research Services Turku (CRST)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Informed consent obtained from the patient and legally acceptable representative, if required
- Informed consent obtained from the caregiver
- Males and and females between 55-90 years
- Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease, history of progressive cognitive deterioration
- Brain imaging consistent with Alzheimer's disease
- Mini-mental state examination score 12-21
- Treated with donepezil, rivastigmine or galantamine
- At least mild level of behavioral symptoms
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other types of dementias
- Modified Hachinski Ischemia Score > 4
- Use of memantine, antipsychotics, anticholinergic medication and benzodiazepines (at a max of 3 nights/week) within 2 months
- Changes in antidepressant dosing within 2 months
- Use of other psychotropic agents
- Myocardial infarction within the past 2 years
- Malignancy within the past 5 years
- Suicidal ideation, risk of suicide
- History of alcoholism or drug abuse within 5 years
- Clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological or psychiatric disorder or any other major concurrent illness
- Specific findings in brain imaging
- Abnormal findings in heart rate, blood pressure, ECG, laboratory tests, physical examination; orthostatic hypotension
- Blood donation or participation in a drug study within 60 days
- Previous AD immunotherapy treatment
- Patient cannot complete the computerised cognitive training
- Patients who reside in a skilled nursing facility
- Patients who are not able to swallow capsules
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
|
Placebo twice a day
|
|
Experimental: Low dose of ORM-12741
|
60mg twice a day
200mg twice a day
|
|
Experimental: High dose of ORM-12741
|
60mg twice a day
200mg twice a day
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Adverse events from start of ORM-12741 treatment until end of study visit.
|
3 months
|
|
Quality of Episodic Memory
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning.
Quality of Episodic Memory measures the capability of maintaining information in episodic memory and is assessed as the sum of sensitivity indices from 4 memory tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests.
Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
|
3 months
|
|
Quality of Working Memory
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning.
Quality of Working Memory measures the capability of maintaining information in working memory and is assessed as the sum of sensitivity indices from 2 memory tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests.
Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
|
3 months
|
|
Quality of Memory
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning.
Quality of Memory is a combination of outcome measures Quality of Working Memory & Quality of Episodic Memory.
Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
|
3 months
|
|
Speed of Memory
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning.
Speed of Memory is assessed as the sum of speed measures from 2 memory tasks and 2 recognition tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests.
Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
|
3 months
|
|
Power of Attention
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning.
Power of attention measures speed and attention and is assessed from 3 attentional tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests.
Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
|
3 months
|
|
Continuity of Attention
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised battery tests is designed to evaluate the effects of novel compounds on the quality of cognitive functioning.
Continuity of attention measures speed and accuracy and is calculated from 3 attentional tasks on the CDR computerised battery tests.
Values are calculated by a computer and higher scores mean better outcome.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
NPI Total Score
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The total score of Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) was assessed by a caregiver interview.
10 behavioral areas were included: Delusions, Hallucinations, Agitation/Aggression, Depression/Dysphoria, Anxiety, Elation/Euphoria, Apathy/Indifference, Disinhibition, Irritability/Lability, and Aberrant Motor Behaviour.
Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Minimum value 0, maximum value 120.
|
3 months
|
|
Caregiver Distress Score
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Caregiver distress score generated by adding together the scores of individual NPI distress questions of Neuropsychiatric Inventory NPI.
Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Minimum value 0, maximum value 120.
|
3 months
|
|
Pharmacokinetics of ORM-12741
Time Frame: 3 months
|
ORM-12741 plasma trough concentrations at week 12.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Juha Rinne, Prof, Clinical Research Services Turku (CRST)
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3098006
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.