Comparative Assessment of the Clinical Utility of Ovarian Stimulation With Menotropin Versus Menotropin Plus GnRH Antagonist (PROMENIA)
Comparative Assessment of the Clinical Utility of Ovarian Stimulation With Menotropin Versus Menotropin Plus GnRH Antagonist Following Two Protocols of Ovulation Induction for Intrauterine Insemination
To assess the effectiveness of protocols of ovarian hyperstimulation combining urinary gonadotrophins + GnRH antagonist vs urinary gonadotrophins, to achieve clinical pregnancy in females undergoing intrauterine insemination.
Study hypothesis: protocols combining urinary gonadotrophins + GnRH antagonist should be more effective than monotherapy.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
Ciudad Real, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
Gerona, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
La Rioja, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
Navarra, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
Valladolid, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
-
Tarragona
-
Reus, Tarragona, Spain
- Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women aged 18-36 years
- Body mass index (BMI) between 18 and 26
- Prolactin within the laboratory normal range
- Couples affected by sterility able to treat by IUI (intrauterine insemination)
- Patients undergoing Menopur® treatment
- Normal thyroid function
- Regular menses (21-35 days)
- Couples willing to participate in the study that have signed the informed consent form
- Seminal sample REM>3 million
Exclusion Criteria:
- Two previous ART (assisted reproductive technology) cycles without ongoing pregnancy
- Policystic ovarian syndrome
- Evidence of significant bacterial infection in the seminogram of the couple in the preceding 6 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
hMG-HP
Patients with a condition
|
|
|
hMG-HP + GnRH antagonist
Patients with a condition
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Clinical pregnancy rate
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Live birth rate
Time Frame: 40 weeks
|
40 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FER-MEN-2006-01
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.