Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) in Participants With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post Essential Thrombocythemia-myelofibrosis and Post Polycythemia Vera-myelofibrosis (PPV-MF)

January 17, 2020 updated by: Incyte Corporation

An Open-Label Assessment of Safety and Efficacy of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) in Subjects With Primary Myelofibrosis, Post- Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, and Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis Who Have Platelet Counts of 50 × 10^9/L to 100 × 10^9/L

To evaluate the effects of treatment with ruxolitinib (INCB018424) on spleen volume, symptoms and potential side effects in participants with PMF, PPV-MF and PET-MF who have platelet counts of 50 x 10^9/L to 100 x 10^9/L. It is anticipated that individualized dose optimization from the starting ruxolitinib level of 5 mg bid will be associated with reductions in splenomegaly, MF-associated symptoms and inflammatory cytokine levels.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
66

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Expanded Access

Expanded Access

A way for patients with serious diseases or conditions who cannot participate in a clinical trial to gain access to a medical product that has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Also called compassionate use. There are different expanded access types.
Approved

Approved

  • Available: Expanded access is currently available for this investigational treatment, and patients who are not participants in the clinical study may be able to gain access to the drug, biologic, or medical device being studied.
  • No longer available: Expanded access was available for this intervention previously but is not currently available and will not be available in the future.
  • Temporarily not available: Expanded access is not currently available for this intervention but is expected to be available in the future.
  • Approved for marketing: The intervention has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use by the public.
 for sale to the public. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States
      • Burbank, California, United States
      • La Jolla, California, United States
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
      • Pomona, California, United States
      • San Diego, California, United States
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States
      • Orange City, Florida, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
    • Iowa
      • Iowa City, Iowa, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
      • Southfield, Michigan, United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
      • Morristown, New Jersey, United States
      • Somerville, New Jersey, United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States
      • Hickory, North Carolina, United States
    • Ohio
      • Canton, Ohio, United States
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
    • Vermont
      • Burlington, Vermont, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with PMF, PPV-MF or PET-MF as confirmed by bone marrow biopsy
  • Discontinuation of all drugs used to treat underlying MF disease at least 14 days prior to baseline visit
  • INR <= 1.5 or PTT value < 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) at study entry
  • Hemoglobin level at least 6.5 g/dL at Screening visit
  • Willingness to be transfused to treat low hemoglobin levels

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females who are pregnant, unable to comply with birth control use to avoid becoming pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Males who cannot comply with birth control use to avoid fathering a child
  • Platelet count < 50 x10^9/L or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1 x10^9/L at the Screening visit
  • Inadequate liver or renal function; Intracranial bleeds or invasive malignancy over the previous 2 years - international normalized ratio (INR) laboratory values cannot be > 1.5 x upper limit of normal at study entry.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Ruxolitinib 5 mg
Participants began administration with 5 mg ruxolitinib twice daily (BID) orally. Beginning at the Week 4 visit, doses of ruxolitinib could be increased in 5 mg once a day (QD) increments every 4 weeks every 4 weeks not to exceed a dose of 25 mg BID.
Drug: Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib (INCB018424), 5 mg bid
Other Names:
  • INCB018424

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Spleen Volume at Week 24 by Final Titrated Dose
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the upper and lower abdomen and pelvis was performed to assess spleen volumes. Computed tomography (CT) scan was performed if participant was not a candidate for MRI or if MRI was not readily available. MRI was performed with a body coil. Spleen volume was obtained by outlining the circumference of the organ and determining the volume using the validated technique of least squares. The MRI (or CT scan in applicable participants) was performed on the first or second day of the baseline period (ie, Day -7 or Day -6), and the site radiologist sent the scan to the central imaging laboratory that same day. The CT scans were processed by the same central laboratory used for MRIs.
Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Symptom Score (TSS) as Measured by the Modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) V2.0 Diary at Week 24 by Final Titrated Dose
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using a modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Version 2.0 diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left, feeling of fullness (early satiety), and muscle/bone pain. The total symptom score ranged from 0-60 and was calculated as the sum of the 6 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Time Frame: Up to Week 156

TEAE was defined as adverse events that began or worsened from baseline after the first administration of the study drug.

Participants were analyzed based on the number of subjects who received a dose within the dose group. The percentages for each column are calculated using this N. Participants who had more than 1 event in an AE category (eg, treatment-related TEAE) are counted once at each dose level the event occurred.
Up to Week 156
Percentage of Participants With New Onset Grade 4 Thrombocytopenia Events as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03 (CTCAE V4.03)
Time Frame: Up to Week 156

Participants with platelet count between 50 and 100 × 10^9/L at the screening and/or baseline visit were enrolled in the study. Thrombocytopenia is defined as a condition with low blood platelet count. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was platelet count < 25 × 10^9/L.

Participants were analyzed based on the number of subjects who received a dose within the dose group. The percentages for each column are calculated using this N. Participants who had more than 1 event in an AE category (eg, treatment-related TEAE) are counted once at each dose level the event occurred.
Up to Week 156
Percentage of Participants With New Onset Grade 2 or Higher Hemorrhage as Assessed by CTCAE V4.03
Time Frame: Up to Week 156

Hemorrhages were defined as any lower level terms by MedDRA included in the Standardized MedDRA Query (SMQ) for hemorrhage terms.

Participants were analyzed based on the number of subjects who received a dose within the dose group. The percentages for each column are calculated using this N. Participants who had more than 1 event in an AE category (eg, treatment-related TEAE) are counted once at each dose level the event occurred.
Up to Week 156

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change in Spleen Volume at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
MRI of the upper and lower abdomen and pelvis was performed, to assess spleen volumes. CT scan was performed if participant was not a candidate for MRI, or if MRI was not readily available. MRI was performed with a body coil. Spleen volume was obtained by outlining the circumference of the organ and determining the volume using the validated technique of least squares. The MRI (or CT scan in applicable participants) was performed on the first or second day of the baseline period (ie, Day -7 or Day -6), and the site radiologist sent the scan to the central imaging laboratory that same day. The CT scans were processed by the same central laboratory used for MRIs.
Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change in Total Symptom Score as Measured by the Modified MFSAF V2.0 Diary at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using a modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Version 2.0 diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left, feeling of fullness (early satiety), and muscle/bone pain. The total symptom score ranged from 0-60 and was calculated as the sum of the 6 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms..
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 35% Reduction in Spleen Volume at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
MRI of the upper and lower abdomen and pelvis was performed, to assess spleen volumes. CT scan was performed if participant is not a candidate for MRI, or if MRI is not readily available. MRI was performed with a body coil. Spleen volume was obtained by outlining the circumference of the organ and determining the volume using the validated technique of least squares. The MRI (or CT scan in applicable participants) was performed on the first or second day of the baseline period (ie, Day -7 or Day -6), and the site radiologist sent the scan to the central imaging laboratory that same day. The CT scans were processed by the same central laboratory used for MRIs.
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ≥10% Reduction in Spleen Volume at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
MRI of the upper and lower abdomen and pelvis was performed, to assess spleen volumes. CT scan was performed if participant is not a candidate for MRI, or if MRI is not readily available. MRI was performed with a body coil. Spleen volume was obtained by outlining the circumference of the organ and determining the volume using the validated technique of least squares. The MRI (or CT scan in applicable participants) was performed on the first or second day of the baseline period (ie, Day -7 or Day -6), and the site radiologist sent the scan to the central imaging laboratory that same day. The CT scans were processed by the same central laboratory used for MRIs.
Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Improvement in Total Symptom Score as Measured by the Modified MFSAF V2.0 Diary at Week 24 Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24
Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using a modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) Version 2.0 diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): night sweats, itching, abdominal discomfort, pain under ribs on left, feeling of fullness (early satiety), and muscle/bone pain. The total symptom score ranged from 0-60 and was calculated as the sum of the 6 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Baseline and Week 24
Change in Spleen Length Measured by Palpation
Time Frame: Up to Week 156
Measurement of spleen length below the left costal margin was measured by palpation at each study visit. Investigators were provided with a soft centimeter ruler so that palpable spleen length was measured in centimeters and not in finger breadths. The edge of the spleen was determined by palpation, and measured in centimeters, using a soft ruler, from the costal margin to the point of greatest splenic protrusion.
Up to Week 156
Percent Change From Baseline in Spleen Length Measured by Palpation
Time Frame: Up to Week 156
Measurement of spleen length below the left costal margin was measured by palpation at each study visit. Investigators were provided with a soft centimeter ruler so that palpable spleen length was measured in centimeters and not in finger breadths. The edge of the spleen was determined by palpation, and measured in centimeters, using a soft ruler, from the costal margin to the point of greatest splenic protrusion.
Up to Week 156
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Each Visit
Time Frame: Up to Week 156
Symptoms of myelofibrosis were assessed using the PGIC questionnaire. Using the questionnaire, patients rated the overall sense of treatment effect on their symptoms on a scale of 1 (very much improved)- 7(very much worse). The specific wording was: Since the start of the treatment you've received in this study, your myelofibrosis symptoms are: 1) Very much improved, 2) Much improved, 3) Minimally improved, 4) No change, 5) Minimally worse, 6) Much worse, 7) Very much worse. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Up to Week 156

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Incyte Corporation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 15, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 19, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 19, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 17, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • INCB18424-258

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on MPN (Myeloproliferative Neoplasms)

Clinical Trials on Ruxolitinib

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings