Stress Testing Compared to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

April 1, 2015 updated by: Dr Ganesan Karthikeyan, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Stress-rest Single Photon-Emission Computed Tomography(SPECT)Compared to Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in the Initial Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

The use of coronary computed tomographic angiography(CTA)is rapidly increasing, but there is lack of data which supports their use in the initial evaluation of patients who are asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. The hypothesis underlying this proposal is that the use of stress-rest myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) as an initial test for the evaluation of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients who are at intermediate risk of coronary events will result in less further non-invasive and invasive testing and result in reduced costs, without adversely affecting clinical outcomes in the short term.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Recently coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has become increasingly popular as a means of investigating asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients, instead of stress-rest myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), despite the absence of long-term prognostic data. With its high negative predictive value, CTA has become useful for exclusion of CAD in patients with chest pain syndromes. However, the clinical management of a patient with an abnormal CTA is not well defined. Further, several caveats remain regarding the use of coronary CTA. Despite the anatomic data provided by CTA, it does not yield information regarding the functional consequences of the obstruction. Moreover, this technique may miss small vessel disease because of limited resolution and may not be useful in the presence of significant vessel calcium or coronary stents. Most importantly, there is no long-term data regarding the prognostic ability of coronary CTA in the initial evaluation of patients at intermediate risk of coronary events. An abnormal CTA result often leads to additional functional testing or invasive coronary angiography. The major drawback of performing two or more tests in tandem is that it greatly adds to cost that can be prohibitive in lower and middle income countries. Therefore, there is a need to determine if either stress MPI or CTA performed initially, results in meaningful differences in costs without adversely affecting clinical outcomes.

The primary objective of this pilot study is to compare the efficacy (in terms of reduced additional non-invasive or invasive testing) and costs of a strategy of initial stress-rest MPI, to a strategy of initial coronary CTA in the management of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients who are at intermediate risk of coronary events (death or nonfatal MI) by the Framingham criteria.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
303

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • India
    • Delhi
      • New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110029
        • Department of cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consenting patients above 21 years who are mildly symptomatic (those in class II NYHA), who have an intermediate likelihood of CAD, or asymptomatic patients who are determined to be at intermediate or high risk of coronary events by the Framingham (ATP III) criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with prior documented CAD (by angiography), MI, coronary stenting or bypass surgery
  • Patients in class III or IV NYHA
  • Patients with chronic renal impairment to the extent of precluding contrast injection
  • Severe medical disease with limited expectancy of life
  • Contra-indication or allergy to pharmacologic stress agents or contrast agents
  • Patients with unstable cardiac rhythms (including persistent atrial fibrillation) which preclude good ECG gating
  • Weight limitations due to scanner design
  • Pregnant/ lactating women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Coronary CTA
Coronary CTA using standard protocols
Other: Coronary CTA
Coronary CTA using standard protocols
Other: Stress MPI SPECT
Stress MPI using standard protocols
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Stress MPI SPECT
Stress-rest MPI SPECT using standard protocols
Other: Coronary CTA
Coronary CTA using standard protocols
Other: Stress MPI SPECT
Stress MPI using standard protocols

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who have additional non-invasive testing with another modality, or invasive coronary angiography within 6 months of the first test.
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary objective is to compare the efficacy (in terms of reduced additional non-invasive or invasive testing) and costs (at 6 months) of a strategy of initial stress-rest MPI, to a strategy of initial coronary CTA in the management of asymptomatic patients at intermediate or high risk of coronary events by the Framingham criteria, or mildly symptomatic patients who are at intermediate likelihood of having CAD.
6 months
Costs of investigation and treatment in both groups
Time Frame: 6 months
To compare costs between a strategy of initial stress-rest MPI with a strategy of initial coronary CTA in the management of asymptomatic patients at intermediate or high risk of coronary events by the Framingham criteria, or mildly symptomatic patients who are at intermediate likelihood of having CAD.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients who have planned, elective invasive angiography, elective coronary revascularization, or MACE at 6 month and at 1-year follow up
Time Frame: 6 months and 1 year
To compare these two strategies in terms of the incidence of planned coronary angiography, revascularization and adverse clinical outcomes at 1 year (death, nonfatal MI, recurrent ischemia or unplanned coronary revascularization)
6 months and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
International Atomic Energy Agency
University Hospital Ostrava
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Ankara University
Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
Università degli Studi di Brescia
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bab El Oued
Hospital Italiano Garibaldi,Rosario ARGENTINA
Instituto de Cardiologia,Bogota D.C. COLOMBIA
Instituto de Cardiologia y Cirugia Cardiovascular,LA Habana CUBA
Indian Institute of Public Health, India

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ganesan Karthikeyan, MD,DM,MSc, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
  • Principal Investigator: Salah E Bouyoucef, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bab El-Qued
  • Principal Investigator: Jorge Cachero, Hospital Italiano Garibaldi
  • Principal Investigator: Rodrigo J Fernández, Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Principal Investigator: Zuo X He, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Principal Investigator: Claudia Teresa G Villamil, Instituto de Cardiologia
  • Principal Investigator: Amalia T Peix González, Instituto de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular
  • Principal Investigator: Otakar Kraft, University Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Niveditha Devasenapathy, Indian Institute of Public Health
  • Principal Investigator: Davide Farina, Università di Brescia
  • Principal Investigator: Aloha Meave, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
  • Principal Investigator: Barbara G Salobir, University Medical Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Borut Jug, University Medical Centre
  • Principal Investigator: Elgin Ozkan, Ankara University
  • Principal Investigator: Maurizio DONDI, International Atomic Energy Agency
  • Principal Investigator: Ravi KASHYAP, International Atomic Energy Agency
  • Principal Investigator: Diana PAEZ, International Atomic Energy Agency

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 6, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 7, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 2, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Protocol version 1.1
  • CTRI/2010/091/001384 (REGISTRY: Clinical Trial Registry of India)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings