Effectiveness Trial for Project SafeCare for Child Neglect
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Oklahoma
-
McAlester, Oklahoma, United States, 74501
- Eastern Oklahoma Youth Services
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73112
- NorthCare
-
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74120
- Family and Children's Services
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Parents in the child welfare system for neglect with or without physical abuse
Exclusion Criteria:
- Parents in the child welfare system for sexual abuse
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SafeCare with Coached Implementation
Home-based services with the SafeCare model, implemented with in vivo provider coaching as quality control
|
Behavioral home based family preservation.
Weekly visits X six months.
Live observation of practice with expert coaching, feedback and fidelity monitoring
|
|
Experimental: SafeCare without Coaching
Home-based services using the SafeCare model, implemented without in vivo coached implementation quality control
|
Behavioral home based family preservation.
Weekly visits X six months.
No in vivo coached quality control or fidelity monitoring
|
|
Experimental: Services As Usual with Coaching
Usual home based services, with in vivo coached implementation quality control
|
Live observation of practice with expert coaching, feedback and fidelity monitoring
Home based services not using the SafeCare model
|
|
Active Comparator: Services As Usual Without Coaching
Usual home based services without in vivo coached quality control
|
No in vivo coached quality control or fidelity monitoring
Home based services not using the SafeCare model
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Child welfare system recidivism
Time Frame: Up to 2766 days
|
Follow-up for recidivism reports to child welfare, captured from administrative data maintained by the state child welfare system
|
Up to 2766 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Child Abuse Potential Inventory
Time Frame: Approximately 180 days and 365 days
|
This is a questionnaire survey measuring parenting distress, parenting attitudes, and risk for committing child abuse
|
Approximately 180 days and 365 days
|
|
Family Resources Scale
Time Frame: Approximately 180 and 365 days
|
This is a questionnaire survey measuring sufficiency of basic concrete resources in a family, such as adequate food, shelter, utilities, clothing, access to health care, etc.
|
Approximately 180 and 365 days
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Approximately 180 and 365 days
|
This is a questionnaire measuring symptoms of depression
|
Approximately 180 and 365 days
|
|
Social Provisions Scale
Time Frame: Approximately 180 and 356 days
|
This is a questionnaire measuring the degree of social support and quality of social relationships
|
Approximately 180 and 356 days
|
|
Diagnostic Interview Schedule--Drug and Alcohol Disorders Module
Time Frame: Approximately 180 and 365 days
|
This is a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview, adapted to questionnaire format, measuring symptoms of alcohol disorders and drug disorders, with associated DSM based diagnostic algorithms.
|
Approximately 180 and 365 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mark Chaffin, PhD, University of Oklahoma
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aarons GA, Sommerfeld DH, Hecht DB, Silovsky JF, Chaffin MJ. The impact of evidence-based practice implementation and fidelity monitoring on staff turnover: evidence for a protective effect. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Apr;77(2):270-80. doi: 10.1037/a0013223.
- Chaffin M, Bard D. Changes in parental depression symptoms during family preservation services. Child Abuse Negl. 2011 Jun;35(6):448-58. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
- Chaffin M, Bard D, Hecht D, Silovsky J. Change trajectories during home-based services with chronic child welfare cases. Child Maltreat. 2011 May;16(2):114-25. doi: 10.1177/1077559511402048. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 5R01MH065667 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.