Impact of Four Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) on Patient Behaviour (PIL)
Impact of Four Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) on Patient Behaviour : a Randomised Controlled Trial in Primary Care.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antibes Juan Les Pins, France
- General practitioner office
-
Beaulieu Sur Mer, France
- General practitioner office
-
Chambery, France
- General practitioner office
-
Charolles, France
- General practitioner office
-
Chirens, France
- General practitioner office
-
Coublevie, France
- General practitioner office
-
Echirolles, France
- General practitioner office
-
Grenoble, France
- University Hospital Grenoble
-
Grenoble, France, 38000
- General practitioner office
-
La Buisse, France
- General practitioner office
-
La Murette, France
- General practitioner office
-
Lyon, France
- General practitioner office
-
Massy, France
- General practitioner office
-
Megeve, France
- General practitioner office
-
Plessis Robinson, France
- General practitioner office
-
Saint Etienne de Crossey, France
- General practitioner office
-
Saint Marcellin, France
- General practitioner office
-
Saint Martin D'heres, France
- General practitioner office
-
Saint Priest, France
- General practitioner office
-
Saint Sorlin, France
- General practitioner office
-
Ugine, France
- General practitioner office
-
Valence, France
- General practitioner office
-
Voiron, France
- General practitioner office
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patient.
- Minor child accompanied by a responsible adult.
- The patient or the caregiver must be reachable by telephone within ten to fifteen days following the consultation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Illiterate patient
- Patient refusing follow-up call.
- Patient with visual or hearing impairment.
- Patient non-Francophone.
- Private patient of liberty by judicial or administrative.
- Person being a measure of legal protection.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Patient Information Leaflets
Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) is given to the patient during consultation
|
Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) about adult gastroenteritis, children gastroenteritis, adult pharyngitis or either children pharyngitis in consultation room
|
|
Placebo Comparator: usual consultation without PIL
no particular intervention during consultation for the patient.
|
No particular intervention during consultation for the Patient.
No Information Leaflets (PIL) is given
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The primary outcome measure was the mean behaviour score
Time Frame: In ten to fifteen days after patient after the visit
|
All patients were called, ten to fifteen days after the visit, to answer a questionnaire on their behaviour related to the disease since they visited the GP.
It permitted to calculate a behaviour score.
Better was the score, better was the patient's behaviour related to his disease.
|
In ten to fifteen days after patient after the visit
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
the mean comprehension score
Time Frame: in ten to fifteen days after the visit
|
All patients (or their parent) were called, ten to fifteen days after the visit, to answer a questionnaire on their comprehension related to the disease since they visited the GP.
It permitted to calculate a comprehension score.
Better was this score, better was the patient's comprehension.
|
in ten to fifteen days after the visit
|
|
number of visit of patient's family for the same pathology
Time Frame: in ten to fifteen days after the visit
|
we get the information by a phone call to the patient, in ten to fifteen days after the visit
|
in ten to fifteen days after the visit
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Melanie Sustersic, GP, University Hospital, Grenoble
- Study Director: Jean-Luc Bosson, PHD, University Hospital, Grenoble
- Principal Investigator: LUCILE REIN, MD, University Hospital, Grenoble
- Principal Investigator: EVA JEANNET, MD, University Hospital, Grenoble
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Francis NA, Butler CC, Hood K, Simpson S, Wood F, Nuttall J. Effect of using an interactive booklet about childhood respiratory tract infections in primary care consultations on reconsulting and antibiotic prescribing: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009 Jul 29;339:b2885. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2885.
- Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, McWhinney IR, Oates J, Weston WW, Jordan J. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):796-804.
- Kitching JB. Patient information leaflets--the state of the art. J R Soc Med. 1990 May;83(5):298-300. doi: 10.1177/014107689008300506. No abstract available.
- Kenny T, Wilson RG, Purves IN, Clark J Sr, Newton LD, Newton DP, Moseley DV. A PIL for every ill? Patient information leaflets (PILs): a review of past, present and future use. Fam Pract. 1998 Oct;15(5):471-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.5.471.
- Little P, Griffin S, Kelly J, Dickson N, Sadler C. Effect of educational leaflets and questions on knowledge of contraception in women taking the combined contraceptive pill: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 1998 Jun 27;316(7149):1948-52. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1948.
- Little P, Dorward M, Warner G, Moore M, Stephens K, Senior J, Kendrick T. Randomised controlled trial of effect of leaflets to empower patients in consultations in primary care. BMJ. 2004 Feb 21;328(7437):441. doi: 10.1136/bmj.37999.716157.44. Epub 2004 Feb 13.
- Coudeyre E, Givron P, Vanbiervliet W, Benaim C, Herisson C, Pelissier J, Poiraudeau S. [The role of an information booklet or oral information about back pain in reducing disability and fear-avoidance beliefs among patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. A randomized controlled trial in a rehabilitation unit]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2006 Nov;49(8):600-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2006.05.003. Epub 2006 May 26. French.
- Coudeyre E, Poiraudeau S, Revel M, Kahan A, Drape JL, Ravaud P. Beneficial effects of information leaflets before spinal steroid injection. Joint Bone Spine. 2002 Dec;69(6):597-603. doi: 10.1016/s1297-319x(02)00457-8.
- McIntosh A, Shaw CF. Barriers to patient information provision in primary care: patients' and general practitioners' experiences and expectations of information for low back pain. Health Expect. 2003 Mar;6(1):19-29. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00197.x.
- Watkins CJ, Papacosta AO, Chinn S, Martin J. A randomized controlled trial of an information booklet for hypertensive patients in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987 Dec;37(305):548-50.
- Roberts L, Little P, Chapman J, Cantrell T, Pickering R, Langridge J. The back home trial: general practitioner-supported leaflets may change back pain behavior. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Sep 1;27(17):1821-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209010-00002.
- Johnson LK, Edelman A, Jensen J. Patient satisfaction and the impact of written material about postpartum contraceptive decisions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 May;188(5):1202-4. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.308.
- Mancini J, Nogues C, Adenis C, Berthet P, Bonadona V, Chompret A, Coupier I, Eisinger F, Fricker JP, Gauthier-Villars M, Lasset C, Lortholary A, N'Guyen TD, Vennin P, Sobol H, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Julian-Reynier C. Impact of an information booklet on satisfaction and decision-making about BRCA genetic testing. Eur J Cancer. 2006 May;42(7):871-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.10.029. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
- Al-Asfour A, Andersson L. The effect of a leaflet given to parents for first aid measures after tooth avulsion. Dent Traumatol. 2008 Oct;24(5):515-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00651.x.
- Carre PC, Roche N, Neukirch F, Radeau T, Perez T, Terrioux P, Ostinelli J, Pouchain D, Huchon G. The effect of an information leaflet upon knowledge and awareness of COPD in potential sufferers. A randomized controlled study. Respiration. 2008;76(1):53-60. doi: 10.1159/000115947. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
- Scala D, Cozzolino S, D'Amato G, Cocco G, Sena A, Martucci P, Ferraro E, Mancini AA. Sharing knowledge is the key to success in a patient-physician relationship: how to produce a patient information leaflet on COPD. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2008 Jun;69(2):50-4. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2008.395.
- Vetto JT, Dubois PM, Vetto IP. The impact of distribution of a patient-education pamphlet in a multidisciplinary breast clinic. J Cancer Educ. 1996 Fall;11(3):148-52. doi: 10.1080/08858199609528418.
- Leichtnam-Dugarin L, Carretier J, Delavigne V, Brusco S, Hoarau H, Philip T, Fervers B; Comite d'Organisation des Standards, Options et Recommentations SAVOIR; Federation Nationale des Centres de lutte contre le cancer; Ligue contre le Cancer; Federation Hospitaliere de France; Federation Nationale de Cancerologie des CHRU; Federation Francaise de Cancerologie. [The SOR SAVOIR Patient, a project of patient information and education]. Cancer Radiother. 2003 Jun;7(3):210-2. doi: 10.1016/s1278-3218(03)00037-4. No abstract available. French.
- Roland M, Dixon M. Randomized controlled trial of an educational booklet for patients presenting with back pain in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Jun;39(323):244-6.
- Macfarlane JT, Holmes WF, Macfarlane RM. Reducing reconsultations for acute lower respiratory tract illness with an information leaflet: a randomized controlled study of patients in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Nov;47(424):719-22.
- Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Gard P, Thornhill D, Macfarlane R, Hubbard R. Reducing antibiotic use for acute bronchitis in primary care: blinded, randomised controlled trial of patient information leaflet. BMJ. 2002 Jan 12;324(7329):91-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.91.
- Vuorma S, Rissanen P, Aalto AM, Hurskainen R, Kujansuu E, Teperi J. Impact of patient information booklet on treatment decision--a randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation. Health Expect. 2003 Dec;6(4):290-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-7625.2003.00225.x.
- Dedianne MC, Hauzanneau P, Labarere J, Moreau A. Relation médecin-malade en soins primaires: qu'attendent les patients? Investigation par la méthode qualitative des focus groups. La revue du praticien Médecine générale. 2003;17 (612):653-6.
- Paul F, Jones MC, Hendry C, Adair PM. The quality of written information for parents regarding the management of a febrile convulsion: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(12):2308-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02019.x.
- Sustersic M, Voorhoeve M, Menuret H, Baudrant M, Meneau A, Bosson JL. Fiches d'information pour les patients: quel intérêt? L'étude EDIMAP. La Revue de la médecine générale. 2010;276:332-9.
- Lerman C, Ross E, Boyce A, Gorchov PM, McLaughlin R, Rimer B, Engstrom P. The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms. Am J Public Health. 1992 May;82(5):729-30. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.5.729.
- Sustersic M, Meneau A, Dremont R, Paris A, Laborde L, Bosson JL. [Developing patient information sheets in general practice. Proposal for a methodology]. Rev Prat. 2008 Dec 15;58(19 Suppl):17-24. French.
- Sustersic M, Meneau A, Dremont R, Bosson JL. Fiches d'information patient: quelle méthodologie? La revue du praticien Médecine générale. 2007;790:1167-8.
- Sustersic M, Meneau A, Drémont R, Paris A, Laborde L, Bosson JL. Elaboration d'un outil d'aide à l'éducation du patient pas la réalisation de 125 fiches d'information et de conseil concernant des motifs de consultation les plus fréquents en médecin générale. Université Joseph Fourier, faculté de médecine de Grenoble. juillet 2007.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- n° IRB 5891
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.