5-azacytidine Treatment Versus 5-azacytidine Followed by Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

October 26, 2023 updated by: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Comparison Between 5-azacytidine Treatment and 5-azacytidine Followed by Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients With Advanced MDS According to Donor Availability

5-azacytidine treatment prolongs survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but does not cure the disease. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative treatment option but is associated with a high risk treatment-related morbidity and mortality. In the current trial allogeneic stem cell transplantation will be compared to 5-azacytidine only treatment according to donor availability in elderly patients with MDS (55-70 years).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

5-azacytidine treatment prolongs survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), but does not cure the disease. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative treatment option but is associated with a high risk treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Dose-reduced conditioning prior transplantation allows also treatment of elderly patients with MDS. In the current trial allogeneic stem cell transplantation will be compared to 5-azacytidine only treatment according to donor availability in elderly patients with MDS (55-70 years).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
191

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Charite Campus Benjamin Franklin
      • Bonn, Germany
        • Uniklinikum Bonn
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Universitätsklinikum Dresden
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
      • Essen, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Essen
      • Essen, Germany, 45122
        • Universitätsklinikum Essen
      • Frankfurt am Main, Germany
        • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
      • Göttingen, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Göttingen
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
      • Köln, Germany
        • Universität zu Köln
      • Mannheim, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
      • München, Germany
        • Klinikum rechts der Isar
      • Münster, Germany
        • Universitatsklinikum Munster
      • Nürnberg, Germany
        • Klinikum Nürnberg
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Medizinische Universitätsklinik II
      • Ulm, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Ulm

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with proven de novo or therapy-related MDS / CMML (WBC <13 GPT/l)according to FAB and risk profile according to IPSS: intermediate II- risk or high-risk or intermediate I with high-risk cytogenetic (according to IPSS, taking into account that IPSS, however, was not validated for t- MDS), patients with secondary AML (according to WHO) and blasts ≤ 30 % (= RAEB-t according to FAB)
  • Previously untreated or maximal 1 cycle of 5-azacytidine (Vidaza®)
  • Male or Female; Age 55 - 70 years
  • Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
  • ECOG performance status of ≤ 2 at study entry
  • Adequate renal and liver function: creatinine and bilirubin < 3 x the upper limit of normal
  • Sufficient cardiac function (ejection fraction > 30 %)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Blasts > 30 % in bone marrow at time of diagnosis
  • Central nervous involvement
  • Severe irreversible renal, hepatic, pulmonary or cardiac disease, such as
  • Total bilirubin, SGPT or SGOT ≥ 3 times upper the normal level
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction < 30 %
  • Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min
  • DLCO < 35 % and/or receiving supplementary continuous oxygen
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding female subject
  • Patients with a life-expectancy of less than six months because of another debilitating disease
  • Serious psychiatric or psychological disorders
  • Uncontrolled invasive fungal infection at time of registration
  • Known positive for HIV or acute infectious hepatitis, type A, B or C
  • Participation in another study with ongoing use of unlicensed investigational product from 28 days before study enrollment until the end of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 5-azacytidine treatment until progress
5-azacytidine until progress
Procedure: 5-azacytidine until progress
if no donor available 5-azacytidine until progress or toxicities
Experimental: allogeneic stem cell transplantation
after 4 cycles 5-azacytidine and if donor available: allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning
Procedure: allogeneic stem cell transplantation
donor available, after 4 cycles 5-azacytidine allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced conditioning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: three years
compare to overall survival of patients who receive after 4 cycles of 5-azacytidine either allogeneic stem cell transplantation or continuous 5-azacytidine if no compatible donor is available overall 230 patients
three years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
response
Time Frame: three years

Comparison of response according to International Working Group Response Criteria between both arms:

- Examinations of bone marrow (count of blasts) and peripheral blood (hematological improvement)after schedule of study assessments (after cycle 4 in both arms, after cycle 8 and after months 12-24-36 in the 5-azacytidine treatment and on day 100, day 180, months 12-24-36 after allogeneic stem cell transplantation
three years
event-free survival
Time Frame: three years

comparison of event free survival in both arms (230 pat.):

- evaluation of survival status (relapse, date of relapse, alive or death) in the whole study period
three years
overall survival
Time Frame: three years

Comparison of overall survival between both arms (230 pat.).

- evaluation of survival status (alive or death/date of death) in the whole study period
three years
impact of Comorbidity-index on outcome
Time Frame: three years

impact of comorbidity-index on outcome after study entry and prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (according definitions and weighted scores of comorbidities by Sorror et al):

  • physical examination
  • laboratory values(creatinine,Alt, AST, bilirubin, etc.)
  • apparative diagnostics (echo,lufu,ECG)
three years
Treatment-related mortality
Time Frame: three years

compare treatment related mortality in both arms (230 pat.):

- death according to treatment in both arms
three years
Evaluation of toxicity
Time Frame: three years

the evaluation of toxicity will be performed according to the reporting guidelines as per NCI CTCAE in the whole study period:

  • adverse events grade 3 and 4
  • cytopenia grade 3 and 4 only be reported as AE which are judged by the investigator as clinically relevant
three years
quality of life
Time Frame: three years
Comparison of quality of life between both arms with the quality of life core questionnaire QLQ-C30 and the treatment specific high-dose chemotherapy module QLQ HD-C29 to assess the quality of life of cancer patient. The questionnaire has to be answered after the fourth cycle, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years after both treatment arms
three years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nicolaus Kroeger, Prof., University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Stem-Cell-Transplantation

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 30, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 27, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 28, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 26, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VidazaAlloStudy

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Clinical Trials on 5-azacytidine until progress

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings