Decreasing Postoperative Complications by Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy During Esophageal Resection

November 28, 2023 updated by: Lena Nilsson, University Hospital, Linkoeping

Perioperative Goal Directed Fluid Therapy During Esophageal Resection A Prospective Randomized Controlled Open Multi-centre Trial to Study the Effect on Postoperative Complications

Surgery for cancer of the esophagus is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications. It has been shown that the risk of postoperative complications can be decreased by optimising the amount and type of infusion fluids given during surgery, steered by measurement of cardiac stroke volume, mostly done with a device called esophageal Doppler. This device can however not be used during this type of surgery. This study wants to test the hypothesis that postoperative complications in patients operated for esophageal cancer can be partially prevented by using a goal directed strategy for the administration of fluids and drugs influencing the heart and vessels, based on measurement of stroke volume by pulse wave analysis (FloTrac).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Linköping, Sweden, 58246
        • University Hospital Linkoeping

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for transthoracic esophageal resection because of malignancy, without colonic interposition who leave informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA 4 or 5
  • Atrial Fibrillation
  • Significant Aortic or Mitral Valve Insufficiency
  • Preoperative planned extensive monitoring beyond CVP, arterial blood pressure, diuresis, ECG and other standard monitors

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: standard treatment
Fluid and inotropic drugs are given based on conventional parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate as judged by the individual anesthesiologists judgement.
Active Comparator: goal-directed fluid treatment
Stroke Volume and Cardiac Index are measured with the Flotrac/Vigileo system and circulation is optimised

Stroke Volume and Cardiac Index are measured with the Flotrac/Vigileo system and circulation is optimised

  1. Crystalloid infusion (2,5 ml/kg/t) throughout surgery
  2. 3 ml/kg Volulyte (synthetic colloid) is infused during 5 minutes and SV is measured directly before and 5 minutes after. If SV increases more than 10% the dose is repeated until no increase > 10% is observed. A new dose is given if SV decreases more than 10% from the last value.
  3. If despite optimal filling Cardiac Index (CI) is below 2,5 l/min/m2 infusion with dobutamin is started to attain CI > 2,5.
  4. If despite CI > 2,5 Mean Arterial Pressure <65 mmHg vasopressor (phenylephrine / norepinephrine) is started until MAP equals or is over 65.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of complications 5 and 30 days postoperatively
Time Frame: 5 and 30 days postoperatively
5 and 30 days postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
length of stay ICU and total hospital
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
return of bowel function
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Lena Nilsson, MD PhD, University Hospital, Linkoeping

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2011

First Posted (Estimated)

August 12, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • USANOP001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on fluid optimisation

Search Similar Trials