Collection of Efficacy and Safety Data of Chinese Patients Who Have Received Faslodex 250mg Treatment

December 4, 2017 updated by: AstraZeneca

A Multicenter, Non-interventional, Prospective Study to Collect Efficacy and Safety Data in Chinese Patients Who Have Received Faslodex 250mg Treatment Under the Condition of Actual Usage in Clinical Practice

This study is a post-authorisation study, committed to Center for Drug Evaluation (CDE) and China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA), in order to provide more effectiveness and safety data about Faslodex in real world clinical practice in China. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Faslodex 250mg monthly to treat post-menopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, for disease relapse on or after adjuvant anti-oestrogen therapy or disease progression on therapy with an anti-oestrogen, in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), by collecting real world data according to Chinese physicians' clinical practice.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

A Multicenter, non-interventional, prospective study to collect effectiveness and safety data in Chinese patients who have received Faslodex treatment under the condition of actual usage in clinical practice

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
231

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Research Site
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China
        • Research Site
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Research Site
    • Guizhou
      • Guiyang, Guizhou, China
        • Research Site
    • Hebei
      • Tangshan, Hebei, China
        • Research Site
    • Heilongjiang
      • Ha'erbin, Heilongjiang, China
        • Research Site
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China
        • Research Site
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China
        • Research Site
    • Inner Mongolia
      • Huhehaote, Inner Mongolia, China
        • Research Site
    • Jiangsu
      • Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
        • Research Site
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
        • Research Site
      • Nantong, Jiangsu, China
        • Research Site
      • Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
        • Research Site
    • Jilin
      • Changchun, Jilin, China
        • Research Site
    • Shandong
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China
        • Research Site
      • Weifang, Shandong, China
        • Research Site
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Research Site
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • Research Site
    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China
        • Research Site
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, China
        • Research Site
    • Zhejiang
      • Hanghzou, Zhejiang, China
        • Research Site
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Research Site
      • Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Medical units

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chinese postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor positive, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer Failure to previous anti-estrogen therapy, already received Faslodex 250mg treatment as determined by treating physician.
  • The prescription of the Faslodex is clearly separated from the decision to include the subject in the NIS, and is part of normal medical practice. The recruitment of the patient to the study should be within 1 month of the first Faslodex injection.
  • Provision of subject informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If participating in any controlled clinical trial, the subject cannot take part in this study.
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance, or to any of the other excipients.
  • Pregnancy and lactation, or severe hepatic impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To evaluate the effectiveness of Faslodex 250mg monthly to treat post-menopausal women with ER+ locally advanced or MBC in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), by collecting real world data according to Chinese physicians' clinical practice.
Time Frame: Follow-up will be taken every 3 months after commencement of the protocol, through study completion, an average of 12 months.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Faslodex 250mg monthly to treat post-menopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, for disease relapse on or after adjuvant anti-oestrogen therapy or disease progression on therapy with an anti-oestrogen, in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), by collecting real world data according to Chinese physicians' clinical practice.
Follow-up will be taken every 3 months after commencement of the protocol, through study completion, an average of 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Follow-up will be taken every 3 months after commencement of the protocol, through the study completion, an average of 12 months.
ORR was defined as the percentage of patients who had a best objective tumour response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) among the evaluable patients with measurable disease at baseline. The best overall response was the best response recorded from the start of the treatment until disease progression. The RECIST1.1 criteria were used to assess objective tumour response. ORR was summarized and expressed as the percentage together with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Follow-up will be taken every 3 months after commencement of the protocol, through the study completion, an average of 12 months.
Frequency of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Follow-up will be taken every 3 months after commencement of the protocol, through study completion, an average of 12 months.
Adverse events (AEs) data were coded using Medical dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 14.0 and summarized by preferred term (PT) and system organ class (SOC).
Follow-up will be taken every 3 months after commencement of the protocol, through study completion, an average of 12 months.
Severity of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Follow-up will be taken every 3 months after commencement of the protocol, through study completion, an average of 12 months.
SAEs causally related to study drug, AEs leading to discontinuation, AEs leading to death, respectively. Separate listings were provided for AEs causally related to study drug, AEs leading to death, respectively. The severity of all adverse events was analyzed according to CTCAE grading.
Follow-up will be taken every 3 months after commencement of the protocol, through study completion, an average of 12 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AstraZeneca

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 30, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 19, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NIS-OCN-FAS-2011/1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings