Study to Explore the Relationships Among Immunity and Stress and the Symptoms of Fatigue, Pain, and Mood Following Guided Imagery in Women With Fibromyalgia

October 13, 2011 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University

Self-Efficacy, Stress, Immunity and Symptoms of Fibromyalgia

This project will be the first known to explore the relationships among immunity and stress and the symptoms of fatigue, pain, and mood following guided imagery in women with fibromyalgia. Finding ways to reduce these unpleasant symptoms may lead to improved function and well-being in this chronic disorder.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic widespread pain and fatigue syndrome that affects 3 to 6 million adults in the United States. Consequences of FM include physical and psychological distress, loss of work productivity, reduced quality of life, and increased use of health resources. Although the mechanisms underlying the symptomatology of FM are not clear; one theory suggests potential alterations in cytokine balance. Because the symptoms of FM may be worsened by stress and negative psychological processes, mind-body modalities may positively influence the neuroendocrine and immunological mediators of symptoms in FM. Given that immune modulation by both psychosocial stressors and interventions has been linked to health changes, self-efficacy (i.e., the belief that one can cope), may be one mechanism affecting FM outcomes. The specific aims of this project are: (1) to test the effects of a 10-week guided imagery intervention in comparison to an attention control group among women diagnosed with fibromyalgia on (a) the primary outcomes of self-efficacy for managing symptoms and perceived stress and (b) the secondary outcomes of symptoms of fatigue, pain, distressed mood, and depressive symptoms and markers of immune function; and (2) to examine the relationships among self-efficacy for managing symptoms, perceived stress, symptoms of fatigue, pain, distressed mood, and depressive symptoms and markers of immune function. The biobehavioral framework to guide this project is adapted from psychoneuroimmunology. Using a randomized controlled two-group design with repeated measures, 72 individuals will be recruited and randomized into one of two groups: Usual Care plus guided imagery (GI) intervention (Group 1) or Usual Care alone (i.e., attention control group) (Group 2). The intervention consists of three 30-minute guided imagery audio recordings to be used in a proscribed manner over a 10-week period. An ANCOVA model will be used to test for group differences between the intervention and standard care groups at week 10. This project will be the first known to explore the relationships among cytokines and perceived stress and the symptoms of fatigue, pain and mood following the administration of a biobehavioral intervention in women with FM.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Common Wealth University Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ages 18 and older
  • female
  • diagnosis of FM based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria and documented by the patient's primary physician
  • no known major psychiatric or neurological conditions that would interfere with project participation
  • able to speak and read standard English
  • a minimum of a 6th grade education level
  • an ability to understand and sign the consent form and understand and complete the pencil and paper assignments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of other systemic rheumatologic conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and/or Sjogren's Disease
  • history of epilepsy
  • any present psychiatric disorder involving a history of psychosis (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder; schizophreniform disorder, delusional disorder, etc.)
  • being immunocompromised
  • receiving corticosteroid treatments
  • being pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Guided Imagery
The intervention consists of three audio-recorded guided imagery scripts formatted as three separate tracks on one CD. Each track is 30 minutes in length and is to be used in a recommended order for the first 6 weeks of the intervention and then used in any order for the follow-up weeks, 7 through 10. Project participants will be instructed to use each CD track, as prescribed, a minimum of once daily. CD Track 1 is a basic relaxation entrainment script; CD track 2 is a pleasant scene imagery script; CD track 3 is a well body imagery script.
Other: Guided Imagery
The intervention consists of three audio-recorded guided imagery scripts formatted as three separate tracks on one CD. Each track is 30 minutes in length and is to be used in a recommended order for the first 6 weeks of the intervention and then used in any order for the follow-up weeks, 7 through 10. Project participants will be instructed to use each CD track, as prescribed, a minimum of once daily. CD Track 1 is a basic relaxation entrainment script; CD track 2 is a pleasant scene imagery script; CD track 3 is a well body imagery script.
No Intervention: control
Participants in the control group will be instructed to maintain their FM treatment regimens as reported at baseline.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue
Time Frame: baseline
Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form(MFSI-SF), PROMIS Fatigue Short-Form, and Brief Fatigue Invebtory (BFI) and 17 cytokines
baseline
Fatigue
Time Frame: 6th weeks
Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form(MFSI-SF), PROMIS Fatigue Short-Form, and Brief Fatigue Invebtory (BFI) and 17 cytokines
6th weeks
Fatigue
Time Frame: 10th week
Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form(MFSI-SF), PROMIS Fatigue Short-Form, and Brief Fatigue Invebtory (BFI) and 17 cytokines
10th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Virginia Commonwealth University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Victoria Menzies, PhD, APRN-BC, Virginia Commonwealth University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 12, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 18, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 13, 2011

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 12211 (Company Internal)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings